Tag Archives: tWAT
Yet another supposed "terrorist plot" has been "foiled."
One thing I’ve noticed about the various terrorist plots foiled by the USG is that they’ve all involved undercover USG-types posing as Al Qaeda or someone else. When those dudes in Florida wanted to blow up the Sears Tower, they were to get everything from weapons to boots (BOOTS!) from their Al Qaeda guy. Their Al Qaeda guy was actually FBI. Turns out they had zero means to do what they wanted to do.
Likewise, that kid who wanted to leave a bomb at a Christmas tree lighting ceremony in Oregon (I think) a year or two ago–he was a kid who was dealing with, who he thought was an Al Qaeda guy, but was actually an FBI guy. This was a kid who had no means to commit his act of terror.
And again, recently with this supposed Iranian plot. Check out what Reuters reported:
U.S. court documents accuse Arbabsiar, a naturalized U.S. citizen with an Iranian passport, of paying $100,000 to an informant, who had posed as an associate of a Mexican drug cartel but in fact worked for the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency and alerted the authorities to the plot.
Now, there aren’t enough specifics here to say it’s essentially a case of entrapment (like we can say about the previous two examples), but if the USG is sticking to form, we can certainly consider it a strong possibility until we know for sure. But seriously, we really shouldn’t be surprised if suddenly this story drops out of the media entirely in a few days like those previous stories I mentioned.
It’s just another example of this trumped up (non-)war on terror.
– Download Yet another supposed “terrorist plot” has been “foiled.” as PDF –
Frank Miller: Great Writer and Great Fear Monger? Yeah, probably.
Frank Miller, the man who wrote some of my favorite comic stories ever, has a new graphic novel called “Holy Terror“. If you’re familiar with his previous work “300” and his politics, you’ll not be too surprised that this new book is about super-heroes going up against jihadists. Spencer Ackerman has reviewed it negatively (understandably) for Wired. Toward the end of the review, Ackerman explains:
And following 9/11, Miller himself had a sophisticated, complex reaction, intolerant of anyone’s easy pieties. As David Brothers at Comic Alliance reminds, Miller contributed to a volume called 9-11 Artists Respond by offering a scathing, stark series of captions — “I’m sick of flags. I’m sick of God. I’ve seen the power of faith.” — over a haunting illustration of the World Trade Center wreckage.
But it wasn’t God who knocked down the Towers. It was fanatics who believed themselves to have deciphered His true message. Miller doesn’t realize that by portraying them as true disciples of Islam, he’s giving the murderers what they want most. That’s the real terror of Holy Terror, the real lie, and the real naïveté.
Absolutely right. However, Ackerman glosses over the real truth behind what brought those towers down. Here’s the comment I left on the review:
I never read “300″ but I saw the movie and found it to be racist, xenophobic and very much a reflection of Bush-era foreign policy. So, Ackerman’s take on “Holy Terror” doesn’t surprise me at all. But I think it’s an important thing to note, that, while a Believer would defend God and say “God didn’t knock down those towers, it was fanatics,” an atheist would point out that it’s the belief in that god, itself, that did it. Of course, then you put every major religious belief system on the hook (which is why you never see it taken that far). We can’t challenge all religions everywhere, now, can we?
But I don’t think planet-wide atheism would solve things, either. Fear-mongering isn’t always about religion. Sure, it was for the Crusades, the Inquisition, the colonization of North and South America (“Convert or die” was the option given to many natives), but often it’s about whatever the fear-mongers can get their hands on. The Soviets were, according to President Reagan, literally, “The Evil Empire” when 30 seconds of thought would have reminded us that they have spouses and children and homes and hopes and dreams *just like us*. And we all know that the human tendency toward the fear of “The Other” goes back much further than the Soviets and so does said fear’s exploitation by humanity’s “great” leaders.
That’s really what brought the Towers down ten years ago–fear. Those extremists were terrified of what would happen to their culture, their beliefs, their loved ones if America wasn’t stopped. Likewise, Frank Miller is terrified what will happen to his culture if Islam isn’t stopped. What’s worse is that it seems like he wants us all to feel that way, too. And that is really really sad and kind of scary.
Sorry for the long comment.
I’m just glad Frank Miller has an outlet for his fears! After watching Thomas P.M. Barnett’s “The Pentagon’s New Map” seminar on C-SPAN a couple times, I think I truly understand why terrorism happens. In that seminar Barnett concludes that the majority of the violence in the world comes from regions of low connectivity. In other words, the people committing the violence don’t feel connected to the world around them. They feel powerless and out of control. Connected people feel that their voice is heard. Frank Miller’s voice is heard by a lot of people. I wonder what he would do if suddenly his audience and book deals vanished. As a writer, myself, I know firsthand that it takes an impossible amount of passion and belief in/for a story to see it through to the end. Now imagine all that passion and belief with no where to go.
As much as I wish Miller would stop writing, I’d definitely prefer literary terrorism to the literal kind. Then again, he could just get a blog like the rest of us.
That seminar from Barnett is really quite excellent. I highly recommend you watch it either at the Google Video link above or here on C-SPAN.
UPDATE 16:45:
Someone commented on the above-mentioned Wired article and basically put forth the idea that some of Miller’s fears are true, saying in part:
Certainly many Muslims and Arabs are very much the peace loving types that Bush espoused, and that you seem to think all non-Al Qaeda-card-carrying Muslims are — but it’s telling that a few cartoons will get Muslims protesting in the streets about offending Islam, while the bombings carried out in the name of their prophet around the world seem to mostly go unmentioned. The “Not in our name” protests are far and few between.
Ugh… I hate this kind of disguised racism, so I had to say something:
I don’t think anyone is saying Islam is a perfect religion with believers who are flawed, just like the rest of us. I think the point is that painting them *all* (or even most of them) as violent people willing to kill for their beliefs is unfair and a mistake. The “connections” you describe are pretty tenuous. I have a good friend who is Muslim and I dated a Muslim, as well. I’m an atheist. They both knew this and they never tried to kill me. Not once! I even had my friend play Jesus in a web video I shot. Does it sound like they have connections to terrorism? Are they acting like extremist Muslims? I don’t think so.
As for moderate Muslims not speaking out against extremist Islam, I agree, but then again, how many moderate Christians do we hear speaking out against the extremist Christianity that denies global warming, hates gay soldiers and is somehow simultaneously both pro-life and pro-war at the same time? Hell, while we’re at it, I’d love to hear from moderate Jews who are against the occupation of Palestine. However, I also understand why it doesn’t happen. How would you like it if I asked you to prove you’re not an ethnocentric, paranoid racist? Wouldn’t you mind me demanding that you prove your innocence to me?
That’s the key, by the way, to know whether you’re being unfair to someone else. Point your judgment or accusations back on yourself. Do they fit? Or not? And why?
In this commenter’s case, he was demanding Muslims prove they aren’t supporters of terrorists and aren’t terrorists themselves. But when a similar question is put to him, how would he like it? He’d probably make excuses about how no group he is affiliated with is responsible for the death of thousands. To which I would say: “Oh, you’re not American then? Because they killed A LOT of people–half-a-million in Iraq, alone! Probably billions if you go back to the Native Americans during the time of western expansion! So, go ahead, prove you’re not a genocidal maniac like so many other Americans throughout history. Or maybe you don’t like someone demanding you prove you’re not like other people of your kind since you’re pretty sure you’re not.”
– Download Frank Miller: Great Writer and Great Fear Monger? Yeah, probably. as PDF –
Earliest form of 911 Exploitation by the Media Came Just Days After
I won’t go on about this too much, but I remember right after 911 seeing the “911″ issue of People Magazine. I know it’s a rag, but I was really surprised and shocked at what I saw inside of it. I scanned in the parts that offended me the most and set up a web page detailing everything, including a pissed off email I sent to the editor at the time. Check out this page here: thepete.com/disgustingpeople/
Please forgive the crappy design and layout–it was a time long before Flickr, blogging or even Web 2.0.
It Has to Be Said: Why 9/11/11 is bugging the shit out of me
Wow… I’m having to unfollow some folks who insist on posting 911-related photos. I wasn’t a NYC resident on 9/11/1 but I don’t know why people need to relive this event annually and usually do so without recognizing the horrible overreaction it inspired from its victims. I saw Newsweek’s latest magazine cover which seems blissfully unaware of the positive spin it provides on death, war, torture and violence. Then I saw, in a sad, self-congratulatory Photoshop montage of tweets, sycophantic followers taking joy in praising said cover (man, that made me angry). I am too scared to look to the TV media because I can easily imagine the absurd depths they’ll descend to in order to “properly” exploit the 10th anniversary of 911.
Even my absolute favorite podcast, Stuff You Should Know, got in on the 911-act and talked about “How the World Trade Center Memorial Works.” Usually they talk about things we should know, instead, they talked about stuff we’re going to already know because everyone and their uncle is covering that memorial. I would say that they handled it well, but not handling it at all would be the better path as, really, do you need to bother with this since so many other folks already are?
So, the day after tomorrow, we are going to remember the 3000ish people who died ten years ago on that day in New York, Pennsylvania and in Virginia at the Pentagon… but who will remember the hundreds of thousands who died in Afghanistan and Iraq thanks to the way we reacted? And what about the tortured, the disappeared and our place in history? All of these things will be ignored while we desperately try to convince ourselves that 911 justified everything we’ve done.
A Japanese person I know recently told me that the atom bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki taught Japan that the only way to respond to violence is with peace. Responding with violence just means more violence.
What is so hard to grasp about this concept?
– Download It Has to Be Said: Why 9/11/11 is bugging the shit out of me as PDF –
666cast episode 54: It's the all Osama bin Laden episode! He's dead, but he's not gone!
It’s the all Osama bin Laden episode! He’s dead, but he’s not gone! Why was killing him wrong? Why shouldn’t we celebrate his death? How does this change squat? Answers to all of these questions AND more in this week’s 666cast!
Oh and here’s the FBI’s Most Wanted page for ObL as of this posting:
It doesn’t mention 911. Go figure.
Episode 54 of the 666cast is hosted at Archive.org.
Please subscribe to the feed.
Don’t forget to visit webstore666!
Killing the killer, who's the savage now?
From motherjones:
Everything you want to know about bin Laden’s death, explained. And updated.
“which speaks to “the nature of the individual.”
Not to mention the nature of the individual pulling the trigger.
I’ve read and heard some disturbing things since Obama’s announcement that bin Laden had been killed, last night. My wife read something from a Facebook status that went something like this: “3000 souls are smiling tonight.”
Ugh.
Really?
Smiling?
I would have been fine with “3000 souls can finally rest in peace” but they’re smiling?
It seems like people have forgotten just how much time, effort and blood, it’s taken to get to this point.
More Americans have died in Afghanistan and Iraq than died in the WTC and Pentagon attacks on 9/11/1. An untold number of non-American civilians have died in both countries, as well. Weddings were bombed, innocent civilians tortured by our soldiers, as well. We invaded two countries and spent over a trillion to fight the terror war that we like to say Osama bin Laden started with us on 9/11/1.
The catch is, he declared that war years earlier, we just didn’t notice. See, we’ve been viewed as an enemy by a lot of the Middle East since long before 9/11. So long that, when one looks at the history of American policy objectively, one can’t help but wonder how long our enemies will take it lying down. In fact, Chalmers Johnson, in his 2000 book “Blowback,” suggested that, if the USG continues it’s current foreign policy as is, it might see attacks on US soil.
Seeing as 9/11 was not the beginning of the war on terror, it’s a mistake to think that this is somehow the end of it. We have done much to inspire our enemies and to think that just because bin Laden is gone, there won’t be another head for this hydra is to not understand history.
Not only does this not change anything (as one friend of mine posted on Facebook last night) but it doesn’t somehow erase the atrocities the American government has committed over it’s 250 year lifespan.
Since last night, I’ve been kind of haunted by this moment imagined in my head of people cheering and shouting in celebration of bin Laden’s death when one yells, without recognizing the irony, “who’s the savage now?!?!”
The answer to that, of course, has always been: us.
– Download Killing the killer, who’s the savage now? as PDF –
EFFYOU.ORG: EFFYOU to alleged terrorism fighters who don't go after ACTUAL terrorists.
EFFYOU.ORG: EFFYOU to alleged terrorism fighters who don’t go after ACTUAL terrorists.
All of the folks out there that are going after Al Qaeda or other extremist-types with the actual means to cause physical harm, GOOD ON YOU! Keep up the good work!! All the other folks out there who go after pissed off kids and other losers who have precisely zero means to commit the acts they say they want to commit: EFF YOU.
Among the principles the United States was founded on, none of them encourages or condones the arrest of people who would LIKE to harm others but can’t actually do it. In fact, one of the most basic concepts behind our country is the idea that every human is entitled to freedom of thought.
What happens when you find a 21 year-old guy or a 19 year-old kid who are pissed off at the government and dream of killing people?
Nothing.
Well…
Read the rest at effyou.org
The USG trumps up threat then tells us how they're protecting us from it.
This is something I’ve noticed the USG and the FBI doing for a while. See if you can notice what’s wrong with the following cutting from a November 28, 2010 article at LATimes.com reporting on a 19 year-old naturalized American (originally from Somalia) who wanted to blow up a bunch of Americans (I’ll add italics to make it obvious):
“The threat was very real,” said Arthur Balizan, special agent in charge of the FBI in Oregon. “Our investigation shows that Mohamud was absolutely committed to carrying out an attack on a very grand scale.”
According to the FBI, they arrested Mohamud after he dialed a cellphone that he thought would detonate a huge bomb — six 55-gallon drums, diesel fuel and a large box of screws — in a large white van parked near the tree lighting.
But the bomb was a fake built by the FBI, and the packed crowds who enjoyed a youth choir and a symphony orchestra at Friday’s holiday celebration at Pioneer Courthouse Square were never in danger, authorities said.
Let me break this down for you:
The FBI finds this teenager who’s pissed at the USG, builds a pretend bomb for him, hands him the detonator and then arrests him when he activates it.
Where’s the crime there, exactly?
I mean, sure, he’s “wrongthinking” like in the Orwell novel, 1984, but wrongthinking isn’t illegal (yet).
On top of that, this guy had no obvious means to make a bomb to kill anyone on his own. He’s a kid. I remember how moody and obnoxious I was when I was 19! (If you think I’m bad now!)
Why is it that we only hear about these toothless tigers and not actual threats being foiled by the FBI? Hell, the Times Square Bomber from earlier this year failed in his attempt to blow up a bomb only because he was a complete and utter fucktard. The FBI didn’t catch him beforehand and nearly lost him as he tried to flee the country.
Seems the FBI can only catch a terrorist if they arm him and supply him first. It’s like a literal version of the “Straw Man Argument” where you, effectively, make a false statement and then prove it wrong to show how cool you are. This time, they prop up this kid as a terrorist and then brag about it when they take him down.
There’s something deeply wrong about this.
– Download The USG trumps up threat then tells us how they’re protecting us from it. as PDF –
Islam and the West: (not) keeping things in perspective
From blogdrop.posterous.com:
Just to put this into perspective, Ariana Huffington transported, for free, around 10,000 New Yorkers to Washington DC for the Rally for Sanity and/or Fear on October 30, 2010. That’s a third of the Taliban and more than Al Qaeda.
Here’s another graphic I nicked from blogdrop.posterous.com:
If you are pro-life you should be horrified by this. Of course, if you are pro-only-your-own-life, you’ve already rationalized this away. Sad, either way.
thepete.com


![[Attribution-Share Alike 3.0] [Attribution-Share Alike 3.0]](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/3.0/88x31.png)
All of the folks out there that are going after Al Qaeda or other extremist-types with the actual means to cause physical harm, GOOD ON YOU! Keep up the good work!! All the other folks out there who go after pissed off kids and other losers who have precisely zero means to commit the acts they say they want to commit: EFF YOU.
