Skip to content
thepete.com - » Reviews thepete.com

TheAdvertising:
:gnisitrevdAehT

PARASITE DOLLS (2003) (anime)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2009-05-08
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Check it out on Amazon.

Would you recommend this? No. This is the worst spin-off of Bubblegum Crisis I’ve seen.

Technically any good? The acting was fine–I really liked the Boomer detective’s voice actor. The animation was pretty awesome, looking–liked the character designs quite a bit. It’s a shame no one ages over the 6-ish-year length of time the anime takes place over. It’s also a shame that the series doesn’t involve the Knight Sabers or even the main characters from AD Police. The lack of anything familiar but the word “Boomer” makes me wonder why they didn’t just replace the word “Boomer” with the word “robot” and let this anime to stand on its own, entirely apart from BGC.

Imagine how bad a Star Wars spin-off would be if only the stormtroopers were in it and the story was a fairly uninteresting series of robots-n-cops stories (that felt stupidly rushed), almost entirely featuring women being corrupt, sex-pots, or sex-pot-robots. Only one woman doesn’t fit this cliche and she was horribly underdeveloped, character-wise.

How did it leave me feeling? Yuck. Glad I’m done with the Bubblegum Crisis universe. :(

Would you sit through it again? No.

I’ve now decided that when I go back through the BGC saga again, I’ll be sticking to anime featuring the Knight Sabers only. Though, to be fair, the AD Police remake series was not bad–not great, but not bad. I already watched that remake series, within the last couple years and I’m 90% sure I Pocket Reviewed it, but can’t find the review. I’ll add a link to it to this post when I get a chance.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

AD POLICE (1990) (anime)


by ThePete 12:26 pm 2009-05-01
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Buy it!

Would you recommend this? Meh–not to anyone who loves Bubblegum Crisis. Much of what is strong about BGC is missing here.

Technically any good? The animation is great for the time period and I really like the character designs. The acting is fine, too. But the story hates women (lots of imagery featuring woman-shaped objects/people being harmed, destroyed, or acting crazy) and the universe is MUCH darker than the one in the original Bubblegum Crisis. There is almost no character dynamic here and what does exist is pretty damn cliche. Tough, gritty cops, sweating and killing in the line duty does not really end up feeling like a world soon-to-be inhabited by heroic, mad-robot-fighting women in super-robot-suits.

How did it leave me feeling? Meh. It was fine, but it really highlighted why the AD Police characters are supporting characters in the main BGC storyline–they’re the cliches that the Knight Sabers replace. It also shows off why the Knight Sabers are needed. But why wait for them to show up? Just watch the original Bubblegum Crisis!

Would you sit through it again? Not really. Maybe. Meh, I don’t know.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

BUBBLEGUM CRISIS TOKYO 2040 (1998) (anime)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2009-04-24
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Buy the entire series!

Would you recommend this? Definitely! For anyone who enjoys cyberpunk and/or bad-ass women in robot-suits, this is a very worthwhile show.

Technically any good? The story is solid and there is a really nice, strong arc that you can follow for the entire series. It’s not perfect, and the show falls prey to the classic “what the hell?” kind of ending that a lot of anime suffers from. Still, the characters are well developed, the character and mecha designs are great, and while the animation isn’t perfect, it’s perfectly reasonable. The music is also awesome (and is probably my favorite of all of the music in the BGC universe). The acting is spot on and it’s great that they cast a woman for Priss who sounds like the previous voice actors who have portrayed her.

How did it leave me feeling? Definitely satisfied, though as with all anime that ends with the “WTH?” ending, I do wish there was a bit more of a recap. Sadly, there’s still no talk of a sequel series, despite the enduring cult following the BGC universe has around the world. Ah well.

Would you sit through it again? I’m SURE I will sit through this series again–this is actually the second time I’ve seen it and I still love it. It’s so great to see female characters being heroic, daring and still feminine. Who said women were the weaker sex, never messed with the Knight Sabers.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

BUBBLEGUM CRASH (1991) (anime)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2009-04-17
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Buy it!

Would you recommend this? Because this is part of the original Bubblegum Crisis universe, I say yes, I would recommend it. However, it didn’t really blow me away, like the original series did and without the tie-in, I can’t see myself recommending it to anyone but fans of the franchise.

Technically any good? The animation is noticeably worse and the designs, while very similar, are different from the original designs used in Crisis. However, all of the same charm of the characters are intact, visually, in the story and in the acting. The stories themselves, I found to be a little lackluster and not terribly memorable. There were some nice moments that made this OVA worth watching for original BGC fans, however.

The music is good, as always, as is the voice-over acting (duh, it’s anime).

How did it leave me feeling? Sadly, in the end, I didn’t feel that strongly for Bubblegum Crash. I love cyberpunk, though, so I didn’t mind sitting through it–especially since the original series was what sucked me into anime in the first place.

Would you sit through it again? Not by itself, but I assume I’ll eventually sit through every episode in the Bubblegum Crisis universe again one day and I’ll be happy with watching these three eps when I do.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

FLOW (2008)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2009-04-16
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Buy it!

Would you recommend it? Definitely. In fact, I think most of us in the Western World are so in the dark about water, I think this documentary should be required watching.

Technically any good? While it does come across as very heavy-handed and preachy and doesn’t try too hard to present any opposing view points (though it does try), the facts it presents are undeniable and incredibly disturbing. It’s downright scary how much power big business has over the water in the ground. And just think about how important water is to commerce–as a result, water ends up being the number 3 commodity behind oil and electricity. Yeah. I didn’t know that either. Another fact it presents is that humans account for just 10% of the water use in the world. The rest is split unevenly between agriculture and business–the majority of which goes to business.

How did it leave me feeling? Angry, for two reasons. First, because no one seems to be aware of or have a problem with these giant companies using and controlling so much water. Second because the film pretends that a few isolated victories against these corporations means that we can stop them. Protests have stopped some companies from essentially stealing water, but Coca-Cola, for instance, is a huge company. They didn’t lose that battle in India, they just put their resources someplace else instead of wasting time with a bunch of protesters. So, I could have done without the corny, “speak truth to power” BS and stuck with the fear-mongering since that’s what is needed.

Would you sit through it again? YES! I want to go over the facts presented again and try to pick up on things I missed the first time through. This docu is jammed with interesting stuff and interesting people.

Seriously, watch this movie!!

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

HARVEY (1950)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2009-04-14
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Buy it!

Would you recommend this? Definitely, if you’re looking for a sweet movie that’s maybe just a bit darker than you’d expect. It’s not dark, but wasn’t as warm and light as I thought it would be.

Technically any good? There’s only a bit toward the end where the script starts to let us down–it’s just a slow patch where I found myself confused as to what the heck the movie was doing. However, everything around that slow patch is pretty solid. The movie is based on a Pulitzer Prize-winning play and it shows in the witty dialogue and ironic situations. The acting is as spot-on as you’d expect. However, I found Jimmy Stewart’s pantomime to be a bit less convincing than I would have liked, though I’m sure it was fine for the day and certainly didn’t knock me out of the movie.

How did it leave me feeling? Warm and fuzzy inside. I usually don’t like to feel that way, so I give the movie even more credit for making me not mind. Three-cheers for being a bit darker, too. I’m sure if someone ever (god forbid) remade this movie it would be a good deal lighter.

Would you sit through it again? I would sit through it again, but it’s one of those movies that does a great job–so good that I don’t think I’d want to sit through it again for a while.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Princess and the Warrior (2000)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2009-03-18
Categories | $ | Comments (2) »
listen via talkr

Buy it!

Positive Experience/Entertaining? Geh… kind of. I guess. But annoying as hell, too.

Technically any good? ARG! NO! It meanders all over the place and is frustrating at every turn. The characters in the movie do everything against logic yet somehow (duh, because the writer wants it) they are able to get away with their rock-stupid choices.

Seriously, at almost every point of this movie, there is a character that is doing something ill-advised, illogical, or downright STUPID and yet, fate (the writer) allows things to generally work out for the characters in the end.

I think the film was trying to be some sort of fable, but ends up being very uneven and contrived.

The acting was perfectly reasonable, but no amount of good acting could undo the rest of the flaws of this film.

How did it leave me feeling? FRUSTRATED. I had to have one of my venting sessions afterwards because it was just a mess. I really like Tom Tykwer as a director–I loved Run Lola Run and enjoyed Winter Sleepers quite a lot. However, The Princess and the Warrior was just annoying as hell to sit through.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

WELCOME TO THE DOLLHOUSE (1995)


by ThePete 12:06 pm 2009-03-17
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Buy it!

Watch it online!

Positive Experience/Entertaining? Well, I enjoyed it, but you might not. To say this movie is dry is an understatement (but I like dry).

Technically any good? I think it manages to do exactly what it tries to do. It’s a little meandering, but not in any way that really harms the film. Don’t expect a clear plot, though–it doesn’t have one. It’s more like a series of events in this young girl’s life mashed into the span of a few days. If you’ve heard of the absurdist genre, then you’ve found one of the few films in existence that can be called absurdist. Think parody without being funny and you kind of know what absurdism is.

The acting is spot-on from the cast–though I can’t say being boring, whiny, suburban types is that difficult to play. Heather Matarazzo is pretty amazing as the lead.

How did it leave me feeling? Entertained, but dryly so. You might say that if William Shakespeare had grown up in the modern suburbs and was Woody Allen, this would be one of his tragedies. Nothing epic, mind-blowing or tremendous, but a bitingly accurate commentary of modern suburban life where everyone suffers and there’s no happy ending.

Final Rating? SIYL – See If You Like. It’s VERY dry.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

TERMINATOR SALVATION (2009) (Preemptive Strike)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2009-03-16
Categories | $ | Comments (1) »
listen via talkr

Watch the trailer.

Positive Experience/Entertaining? I guess watching the trailer was a positive experience. Honestly, Terminator 3 was such crap I really am not expecting much from Terminator 4. So, with that in mind, it sure looked better than the last one.

Technically any good? The FX look amazing. The FX are at the level I’ve always wanted them to be at for a Terminator film that takes place in the dark future the first (and best) movie in the series originally predicted. Everything looks great–the robots, the ships, the nuclear leftovers that were once America’s cities–it all looks pretty awesome.

It’s very sad that Stan Winston isn’t around to see his Terminator design used so effectively. :(

Story-wise, I had some problems, however. Based on the trailer, the movie shows in detail what the first film only talks about–the moments that lead up to the first Terminator being sent back in time. With that in mind, don’t we know how this movie will end already? And then there’s a moment in the trailer that strongly reminded me Battlestar Galactica. So much so that I’m wondering if this couldn’t be a prequel to that show.

How did it leave me feeling? Definitely curious and definitely interested, is how it left me feeling. However, in today’s world of $12.50 ticket prices and a lousy economy, I’m probably not going to be rushing out to see this film. I’ll definitely catch it once it hits Netflix, however.

Final Rating? NFI – NetFlix It for sure–it looks like it’ll be a fun romp. However, I’d rather spend my $12.50 on six subway rides and a bag of Fritos.

That’s another sad thing–when Terminator 2 came out, I remember thinking how unimpressive the premise was. I remember wishing they had just made a prequel instead of a sequel. Now that they have I guess I’m sad that they couldn’t do more to convince me in the trailer that this would be worth my money. It’s the only other Terminator film I’ve wanted them to make.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

BUBBLEGUM CRISIS (1987) (anime)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2009-03-13
Categories | $ | Comments (2) »
listen via talkr

Buy it!

Positive Experience/Entertaining? DEFINITELY. This is among the most classic of classic anime. Bubblegum Crisis, I feel, can be credited with one-third of the inspiration behind the cyberpunk/technoir movement (the other two-thirds are Blade Runner and Terminator).

Technically any good? Some people complain about the abrupt ending of the original BGC series. I don’t know what they’re talking about. The final episode is just the final episode. Granted there is no grand resolution that so many anime series have these days, but it doesn’t really effect the quality or enjoyment of the anime.

All the high-standards are represented, quality-wise. Great acting, great animation (downright stunning for the time period), incredible mecha designs from Kenichi Sonoda and very tight stories. There were only a few times when I had to shrug off a contrived moment or two. The violence level is high, but the themes in Bubblegum Crisis are pretty mature, so kids won’t get much braintertainment out of the series, anyway.

However, the pretty ladies in the robot suits might look attractive to them, so if you’re a parent, don’t let them have access to this series. There is nudity (not excessive) and violence (fairly excessive).

How did it leave me feeling? Very happy. Bubblegum Crisis is the reason I fell in love with anime in the first place. Something about the no-holds-barred atmosphere of it makes it really stick to your ribs. It was great to watch it again for the first time in about fifteen years (only saw it the one time in college).

Final Rating? GSN – Go See Now! If you like robot anime or hot women in robot suits anime, see this series. Hell, even if you just like anime, you should see this historic series.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

QUEEN, THE (2006)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2009-03-11
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Buy it!

Positive Experience/Entertaining? Definitely! It put a human face on these people we know only from the news.

Technically any good? Everything was very solid. The acting was incredible. The script was tight and the story was believable. The only “however” I have here is that the title suggests the movie is actually about the Queen of England. It really isn’t. It’s only about a part of her life. As such, I found it disappointing.

Maybe it was because I was alive and paying attention during the time period the movie takes place and as a result I didn’t need the review of events the film puts its viewers through. That’s not to say it wasn’t a nicely done review, I just wanted to know more about her life. I mean, of all of the incredible things Queen Elizabeth II has lived through, they picked how she dealt with (former) Princess Diana’s death. It was an interesting period, but surely, World War II, or the Falklands, or even the build-up to the Iraq War would have made for better cinema.

How did it leave me feeling? Definitely happy that I saw such wonderful performances from Helen Mirren and Michael Sheen, but ultimately disappointed that we didn’t get more of a history lesson. I won’t even go into how it was definitely a pro-British-Royalty propaganda movie. (Talk about white-entitlement issues! SHEESH!)

Final Rating? NFI – NetFlix It. Worth seeing for the good acting, but ultimately, I don’t think it’s really that worth seeing.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

SWORD OF DOOM (1966)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2009-03-10
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Buy it!

Positive Experience/Entertaining? Wow–this movie is pretty incredible. Sadly, it’s also got some major flaws that aren’t entirely the director’s fault.

Technically any good? This is one of those rare occasions where I will include what I’d consider a mild spoiler. So here, I offer a SPOILER WARNING. That’s not to say that I’m about to divulge a plot point or anything that might ruin the movie for you. However, this might change the way you view the film or it might even influence you to not bother seeing the movie. So, please keep that in mind as you read the next paragraph. YOU HAVE BEEN SPOILER(ish) WARNED!

SPOILER(ish): This film was to be the first of a series of films based on a huge novel. Sadly, the sequels were never made. As a result, there are quite a few plot lines that are never actually resolved. One MAJOR plot line is included in that, sadly. END SPOILER(ish).

This is very frustrating as this film is really amazing. The acting is superb from almost everyone in the cast and Nakadai, in particular, is INCREDIBLE. Sadly, the ending is simply not satisfying, but keep in mind that just about every other damn thing in the movie is.

FX, for the period, are spot-on. Most of the time, I found myself visually convinced the lead was really slicing into his enemies and sometimes really grinding that blade in there, too. Yikes! OH and the fights were all REALISTIC. None of this BS wire-work that is way to common place now. No gravity leaps or super-powered limbs. Just good, old fashioned (literally) sword fighting.

How did it leave me feeling? Disappointed (see spoiler) but definitely entertained. If films as good as this were still made today, I’d love to see a remake done and perhaps a sequel or two. :)

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

WATCHMEN (2009)


by ThePete 4:29 am 2009-03-06
Categories | $ | Comments (1) »
listen via talkr

Positive Experience/Entertaining? Definitely. This movie could have been MUCH worse. A movie for grown-ups about super-heroes. Go figure.

Technically any good? There were a few glaring exceptions, but generally the FX were spot-on. The story, for anyone who knows the graphic novel, is solid and thankfully, the film sticks with it for the most part. The script is tight and includes enough of the original dialog to make the purist in me happy (the cinematography did, also, thankfully). The acting was generally spot-on, as well. I think there were a couple of weak spots acting-wise and I couldn’t quite tell what country one character was from because of their shifting accent, but, generally, no one was so bad as to knock me out of the movie.

Two flaws that jump out at me: some of the makeup and the music. I liked the use of pre-existing songs, but the score, while reasonable music on it’s own, didn’t really fit anywhere it was used. The makeup was a little too caricaturish and not accurate enough for a generally realistic looking film.

How did it leave me feeling? Definitely satisfied. I may be biased, however, as I’m quite used to seeing Hollywood screw the pooch on super-hero movies for decades. However, as far as I can tell, this movie was… actually good. I know–it feels weird for me to even say it.

Final Rating? GSN – Go See Now. It’s got a lot of interesting things to say about humanity. It holds together pretty well and is a pretty faithful adaptation if the source material (which happens to be one of my favorite books of all time). BEWARE: this IS a super-hero movie, but it’s NOT FOR KIDS. It’s actually more violent than the comic it is based on and there’s nudity (of both genders, so everyone can enjoy it! YAY!)

PLEASE NOTE: as I write this, I just got home from seeing it. It’s 4:21am as I type this. I just might feel differently about this movie with more distance between it and me. But for now, I really did enjoy it quite a bit!

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

SILVER CITY (2004)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2009-03-04
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Buy it!

Positive Experience/Entertaining? It was entertaining, but it was pretty damn preachy.

Technically any good? The story holds together and is entertaining (as I mentioned) but ultimately it comes off like a screed against the Republicans. Not that the film’s criticism aren’t fair, it’s just that pounding on Republicans for the entire length of a film does not a good movie make (at least, not usually). The good news is that the plot and acting were interesting enough to keep me paying attention.

The story and script are both as tight as you’d expect from a John Sayles film, and the acting is as solid, too. Most notably for me, Danny Huston who, I believe, is now among my favorite actors thanks to his performance in this movie. I already liked him quite a bit after his turn in The Proposition but seeing him play the flawed-but-trying-to-do-the-right-thing detective in this film allowed me to really see his range. The guy is pretty damn good.

How did it leave me feeling? Satisfied and unsatisfied at the same time. While it was obviously a diatribe against the Bush Administration, I found myself wishing it wasn’t so ham-fisted about it. Not that I feel sympathy for the Republicans, but because I feel like Democrats aren’t entirely innocent, either. In this film the liberals are portrayed as just generally loserish and not corrupt. I wish!

Final Rating? NFI – NetFlix It – That’s what I did. By far one of Sayles’ worst movies (but Sayles is brilliant, so keep that in mind). I have yet to see Sunshine State, but give me something infinitely more subtle like Lonestar or even Passion Fish over this.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

MUTANT CHRONICLES (2009) (Preemptive Strike)


by ThePete 4:33 pm 2009-03-03
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Watch the trailer

Positive Experience/Entertaining? As I sat down to watch the trailer, I expected it to look like a loud, obnoxious and stupid movie. As I watched the trailer, I was actually pleasantly surprised. I am curious to see this movie now.

Technically any good? This is definitely an FX-driven movie and the FX look pretty standard for the action movies of today. One of the things I really like about how the film looks is the cross of time periods. Something anime has been doing for years is mixing design elements from different time periods creating a look that you can’t quite put a calendar date on. I really dig this kind of thing and it’s used in Mutant Chronicles. Of course, the poster gives the time period away and manages to not show off any of this cool production design, so don’t let the Photoshop-special above, bias you necessarily. Then again story-wise, the trailer makes the film look like your standard xenophobic action movie where the heroic white men must fight against the freaky outsiders. However, the above-mentioned mix of time periods intrigues me and there’s a reason “fear of the other” movies do so well–they’re often a lot of fun.

How did it leave me feeling? Definitely interested to see the movie. However, in today’s economic climate, I can’t say that it made me want to drop $12.50 on a theatrical movie ticket. Buuut, once it hits Netflix, I’ll definitely be checking it out on my flatscreen :)

Final Rating? SIYL – See If You Like big action movies and can afford the movie theater ticket. Don’t expect the next Raiders of the Lost Ark (if it even comes close, I’d be surprised) but it looks as good as a Hellboy, to me anyway.

Check out the trailer for yourself by going here: http://www.apple.com/trailers/magnolia/mutantchronicles/ Read more of my Pocket Reviews at http://pocketreviews.net

Posted via email from thepete’s posterous

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

PARANOIA AGENT (2004)


by ThePete 11:56 am 2009-02-27
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Buy it!

Positive Experience/Entertaining? Wow, was this anime series a lot of fun! No mecha, no sexy teen girls in school uniforms, nothing that is typical to anime “aimed at adults” makes an appearance in Paranoia Agent. But it’s really for adults–though I think kids would enjoy it just fine. It’s a show about a psycho-sociological phenomenon (like a fad that effects how people think) that sweeps the city (but it’s a lot more fun than it sounds).

Technically any good? I usually don’t care for stories that blur the line between reality and fantasy but creator Satoshi Kon manages to blur and blend that line so skillfully, I didn’t care. The characters are so well defined, the story is so intriguing and the acting so solid that I just kept watching even when I couldn’t quite reconcile what I was looking at with reality.

The reality-bending stuff is explained in the end, but only if you look for it. That’s, of course, what I like about a lot Japanese media–they don’t spoon-feed everything to you.

So, on a technical level, this series is about as solid as solid can be. Even the animation (save for one episode) was impressive for a series (usually series get smaller budgets than movies).

How did it leave me feeling? Definitely satisfied. The show makes a very interesting and critical statement about culture and how humans can give into fear and paranoia and, in a way, enjoy it.

Final Rating? GSN – Go See Now. This is an anime that is safe for most ages. There are isolated acts of violence, but they are quick. The only catch with kids watching this is that it is a very mind-bending show at points. Of course, that’s one of the reasons I loved it so much.

Sadly, it appears to be out of print in the US. I do think it’s worth seeing if you can find a copy, though. I found mine on Netflix.

PLEASE NOTE: I do recommend AGAINST watching the English dubbed version. This is not just because of my general bias against western voice over actors generally not being as good. It’s because the translation sucks. In Japanese the nemesis is referred to as “Shonen Bat” which apparently translates to “bat boy”. In the English dub, they refer to him as “Lil’ Slugger.” Bleh. I prefer the simpleness of the more utilitarian Japanese to the snarky English version–and who knows what else the translation changes?

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

ZEITGEIST (2007)


by ThePete 12:16 pm 2009-02-26
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

It’s Documentary Thursday at reviews.thepete.com, when I post a pocket review of a documentary on a given topic that interests me. One thing to bear in mind is that not all documentaries deserve the name “documentary.” However, not all documentaries have to include a British-accented voice-over and a big-money distributor to be worth watching.


Watch or buy it!

Positive Experience/Entertaining? Definitely a positive experience, but I think the filmmaker was a little overzealous with some of the shock treatment-style cinematic devices he uses in this film. This is another in an ever-longer line of “opiniontaries” that generally try to come across as a documentary but ultimately are just trying to put forward their own agenda. Not that this is that different from what other “more acceptable” documentaries do.

Technically any good? This film is incredibly effective. Moving at a quick pace, this film picks you up, carries you along, smacks the crap out of you (and your belief systems) and then drops you off at the side of the road like a cheap prostitute. I’ve heard from friends and strangers that this film changed their lives. I can’t say it changed mine, but it did have an effect.

Over the years I’ve watched a LOT of so-called “conspiracy documentaries.” They all claim to have the answers and the truth and the warnings about the coming “New World Order” blah-blah-blah. I watch them because they are hilarious and, creepily enough, sometimes accurate. Zeitgeist takes the best, most believable of these conspiracy theories and rolls them into one film.

For that reason, I think this is the most effective film to watch if you’re growing dissatisfied with the way the world is run. Zeitgeist does a good job of explaining where our culture comes from and where it is likely going (though I didn’t find myself agreeing with it all the time).

Sadly, it gets mired in 911-related shock tactics that made me wonder if the filmmaker realized how hypocritical he was actually being. Like most opiniontaries, this one gets a few things wrong and the film’s use of what Naomi Klein calls “The Shock Doctrine” as a cinematic technique has the power to undo the rest of the good the film does.

How did it leave me feeling? Definitely educated. After growing up a news-junky and then spending the last seven years exploring the world of conspiracies (for a novel series I’ve written), I do have to say that I have no idea what to believe about our past, present or future. And this film doesn’t help make things clearer.

It does point out a lot of evidence that suggests our civilization is largely built on lies told by power-hungry people who want to control everything through the control of money.

Gotta admit, the film has a point.

Final Rating? GSN – Go See Now – BUT WITH A WARNING: While Zeitgeist is a genuinely powerful and effective movie, it does rely on many of the same tactics it criticizes the “ruling elite” of using to control the masses. It’s important to watch ANY documentary with a clear and critical mind. And most importantly, when you’re done watching it, do some research. Read up on some of the things you’ve been told about.

If nothing else, by presenting such a radically negative view of Western Society, documentaries like this remind us to think for ourselves. Even if you don’t agree, it’s important to consider what other people say. Zeitgeist, I think, nails a lot of things on the head, but it’s not for the faint of heart.

Click the poster image above to go to the official site where you can watch the movie and its sequel (I’ll be reviewing it next week), or buy copies of both on DVD.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

DEATHTRAP (1982)


by ThePete 12:23 pm 2009-02-25
Categories | $ | Comments (2) »
listen via talkr

Buy it!

Positive Experience/Entertaining? YES. It’s been a long time since I’ve seen a movie for adults that actually respected my intelligence and entertained me in a fun way at the same time.

Technically any good? Based on a play of the same name, this movie is pretty tight script and story-wise. There is almost nothing I would have done differently and there was no point in which I was bored. The movie tells its story, develops its characters and slides you to the edge of your seat with subtle skill. The acting from Michael Caine, Dyan Cannon and Christopher Reeve is is solid and very convincing.

The only flaw, I felt, was the music–while there was nothing wrong with it, in theory, I felt it was jarring in a movie that simply didn’t need any music. The performances and the editing are enough to pull you along and keep you enveloped. The perfectly reasonable, but fairly period, music knocked me clean out of the film.

How did it leave me feeling? Definitely entertained and definitely satisfied. It made me want to read the play and maybe even want to be in it. :)

Final Rating? SIYL – See If You Like intense but not terrifying moments. There are some definitely adult themes here, but for intelligent adults looking for a fun movie that won’t make you feel like you’re being spoken down to, this is a perfect pick.

If you haven’t seen this movie, don’t talk about the plot with anyone. Conversations about this film with even those who haven’t seen it are tantamount to spoiler mine fields that are very likely to destroy your first experience watching this film.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

TIME BARBARIANS (1990)


by ThePete 12:16 pm 2009-02-24
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Buy it!

Positive Experience/Entertaining? Well, I’ve got to say no, not really. I know it seems silly to even review a film like this, but hey, I watched it, might as well write about it. But no, this was not a positive experience.

Technically any good? This is your standard, bad b-movie, designed to entice dumb teenage boys to watch in the hopes of finding some nudity and there is a bit of it, so that’s nice for those of us who enjoy seeing topless women. Of course, one of them gets raped, so you might want to bear that in mind.

Aside from the rape scene, the film is generally what you would have expected to see on MST3K since it’s pretty much on the level of Hobgoblins (and even shares a cast member). The acting is as flat as you’d expect, though I never blame the actors. The story is damn near non-existent, though I have to say it’s more coherent than what we’ve got going on Battlestar Galactica, so there is that.

How did it leave me feeling? Achy neck from shaking my head so much. Even as a dumb b-movie, this isn’t one I’d recommend. I also found it kind of weird that while we see a topless woman get raped, during the healthy, nice sex scene between consenting adults we see later on, there is no nudity. Kinda sad if you ask me. I always prefer to see boobs in a positive situation.

Final Rating? DNS – Do Not See. There are loads of better (read: more fun) bad b-movies out there (even with nudity) if you’re interested in doing your own MST3K-style DIY quipathon.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS (2009) (Preemptive Strike)


by ThePete 5:04 pm 2009-02-23
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Positive Experience/Entertaining? based on the trailer? I’d say this movie is bad for all of humanity. You know? There was a time when I would have wanted to see a movie like this–it was the 1980s–a time of shallow, petty, self-centered thinking, when it was still easy to think of a world in terms of “us” versus “them.”

The trailer makes me wonder if the director has grown-up at all since then.

Technically any good? I have to admit that I am seriously biased against Tarantino’s films. The only one I’ve ever liked (and I do love this movie) was True Romance and he only wrote the script. I thought all the others he’s made have been over-rated and ultimately kinda stupid. This movie, again based on the trailer, looks no different.

Sure, the FX will look great–it’s QT, his movies are always slick looking. They’re just lacking in any interesting story or characters. Speaking of story, the story of this movie looks amazingly simple and uninteresting. Not to mention amoral and encouraging the audience to feel good about being violent again.

We can’t feel good about our war on terror, so we’ll feel good about killing Germans.

Yeah, that’s just what we need.

Acting-wise? Who cares? It’s a QT movie. Good acting doesn’t really matter. It’s all about TheSlick.

How did it leave me feeling? It left my skin crawling. How Brad Pitt agreed to do this movie after reading the script is beyond me. The trailer illustrates one of the few things that was wrong with World War II on both sides–the absurd hatred of the other side.

Now Tarantino is going to glorify that hatred.

Yeah, there was a time when I would have loved a movie like this. But then I grew up.

Final Rating? DNS – Do Not See. Let’s not encourage this kind of storytelling. Let’s ignore QT for a while in the hopes that he’ll go back to telling actual stories with actual characters, like he did in True Romance. Wouldn’t that be nice?

But don’t trust my opinion–click on the poster image above and watch the trailer for yourself and see how good it makes you feel.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

TheBlurb: Why can't everyone support Iranians and their quest for liberty?
updated on 06/30/09 22:57:59 Change it! Archives