Skip to content
thepete.com - » movies thepete.com

TheAdvertising:
:gnisitrevdAehT

Hi no tori 2772: Ai no kosumozon (1980)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2009-09-25
Categories | $ | Comments (4) »
listen via talkr

FYI: This movie’s Japanese title is shown above. It was released on VHS in the US back in the 1990s with the title Phoenix 2772.


Try to find this movie.

Positive Experience/Entertaining? Yeesh… I haaate to say this about an Osamu Tezuka film but, for me, it was not a positive experience. I LOVE Tezuka’s stuff, normally.

Technically any good? The animation is definitely stunning by 1980-standards. Obviously, it’s looks dated by today’s standards. But that’s not even what bothers me about this movie. The plot is incredibly thin and the goals are achieved with amazing ease. What’s worse is that there are big, long sequences of “humor” where “cartoon” characters dance around and act silly doing nothing to move the plot forward. These scenes seemed inserted to please international audiences since, at the time, most folks outside of Japan would have trouble wrapping their heads around an adult storyline told in animation, so we see what I can only describe as a Jar-Jar Binks prototype and some of his friends who are equally annoying.

How did it leave me feeling? Disappointed and longing for Tetsuwan Atomu (aka Astroboy) or Black Jack, two of Tezuka’s other creations.

Read a longer review of Hi no tori 2772: ai no kosumozon that I wrote for Otaku-Complex.com here.

Sadly, for fans of this movie, it’s hard to find anywhere and hasn’t been released on DVD in the US. If you find a US distributor, please let me know. It’s Tezuka, so I want people to have access to it.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

MAGIC (1978)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2009-09-23
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Buy it!

Positive Experience/Entertaining? Written by William Goldman and based on his book? You bet it was a positive experience!

Technically any good? While the story is a little basic, it doesn’t overextend itself by complicating the plot too much. As a result it manages to do what it sets out to do really well. And of course the acting is perfect, but what do you expect from this cast? Anthony Hopkins, Burgess Meredith and Ann flippin’ Margret!!

OH yeah and it’s directed by Richard Attenborough.

Yep. THAT Richard Attenborough.

I have to admit being a little disappointed at not being completely blown away by this film, what with the cast, director and writer being known for their relative brilliance. However, this is film embodies the way movies should be made. It’s a good solid work that doesn’t rely on gimmicks or CG or even a lot of violence to creep you the hell out.

How did it leave me feeling? Definitely entertained. Hey, Ann Margret even gives us guys (and any lesbians out there) a little peak! I thought she’d never done nudity. ANYway, it left me very entertained and interested in reading the book it was based on.

Final Rating? SIYL – See If You Like–it’s a psychological thriller so if that’s not your cuppa, skip this. But if you are a person who likes solidly made films and don’t mind a little intense suspense and a bit of blood, Magic is your movie.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

STICKY FINGERS OF TIME (1997)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2009-09-22
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Click above to buy it

Positive Experience/Entertaining? Mixed experience for sure. This movie comes from a great place, premise and intent, but the execution of it just goes south.

Technically any good? Like I said, the premise was really interesting. However, the execution felt sadly student-filmish. The acting through the first third of the film was awkward (and wasn’t so much better through the rest of it) and the editing didn’t help it. Though to be fair to the actors, almost all of them are good in places, so I tend to shrug more at the director than them.

The film felt slow and that didn’t help that the story was really thin. There were plot elements that might have been interesting in a better movie, but this movie has a bad case of trying to run before it could walk.

How did it leave me feeling? frustrated. I don’t know how this movie got in my Netflix queue, but I wish it hadn’t. However, if the filmmaker ever considers remaking this movie, I’d love to help. I truly do think it has some great ideas (and even, on occasion, some great dialog).

Final Rating? DNS – Do Not See.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Paranormal Activity (2007) (preemptive strike)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2009-09-21
Categories | $ | Comments (2) »
listen via talkr

Watch the trailer for
yourself!

Positive Experience/Entertaining? Geh, not really. The movie might be really good, but the trailer just wanted to convince me that some folks were really, really scared by it.

Technically any good? The trailer intercuts clips of the movie with shots of the audience in a crowded theater watching the movie. Showing me how other people react to the movie didn’t make me wonder how I’d react. It made me think: “Well, I tend not to react the way most folks do, so I don’t know if I’ll like this.”

As far as the movie goes, it looks like Blair Witch Project set in an average suburban house. If that sounds appealing to you, then maybe you should see it. However, because of the nature of the cinematography (looking like home video) I’d imagine it would be much scarier watching it at home than in the theater since it would feel like a more natural environment.

The only thing I really got from the trailer was that the FX are pretty realistic. Probably CG, but minimally–WHICH IS GOOD.

How did it leave me feeling? This trailer didn’t give me enough to go on, so I can’t tell if I will go out of my way to see this or not. Probably not since most of what I remember from the trailer (which I just watched moments ago) was just the gimmick of seeing the audience in night-vision video.

Final Rating? NFI – NetFlix It: Really, how can they expect any of us in today’s economy to spend $10+ to see a movie shot like a home video?

This movie originally premiered at Screamfest back in 2007 but then was screened at Slamdance in 2008 and is slated for limited release in the US on September 25, 2009.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

THE UP SERIES (7 Up, 7 Plus Seven, 21 Up, 28 Up, 35 Up, 42 Up 49 Up)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2009-09-17
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Buy it!

Positive Experience/Entertaining? This is easily the most entertaining, enlightening and educational documentary I’ve ever seen. It’s truly incredible!

Technically any good? Throughout the seven-movie series, there are some technical issues that make each “episode” seem less than perfect on a strictly technical level. However, what the films manage to achieve over the span of 40+ years is so amazing as to make almost any technical mistake eternally forgivable.

This series manages to give us a thumbnail sketch of the lives of 14 Brits–from the age of 7 to 49 (and I hope onward). It’s just impossible to describe what this series delivers beyond that because it undoubtedly will deliver something different to each person who watches it.

All I can say with reasonable certainty is that it will, at the very least, change how you look at your own life, regardless of class, ethnicity or nationality. For me, it did so much more. It helped me understand class, chaos, and my own choices better than I ever had.

How did it leave me feeling? Smarter. Seriously–for me watching this series was like living other people’s lifetimes. I was able to see their lives through their own eyes, learn from their mistakes, and really better understand my own life and the lives of those of my friends and family.

What the people in The UP Series have done in being in these movies is provide an amazing tool for learning that will help people all around the world and well into the future learn and understand more about humanity. Many of the participants complain about the “wound” that is opened every seven years of their lives, but for anyone watching it’s an astounding gift that that we open whenever we sit down to watch.

I am SO very thankful that this series was made and I hope very much that it continues.

Thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you to Michael Apted, the other producers and crew that have helped over the years, and most of all, a HUGE THANK YOU to John, Charles, Andrew, Suzy, Jackie, Lynn, Sue, Tony, Paul, Symon, Nick, Peter, Neil, and Bruce for being involved in one of the few documentaries that will always contribute to betterment of humanity.

Final Rating? GSN – Go See Now. Netflix it, rent it, buy it, just SEE IT. It’s truly amazing and each person involved should be knighted by Queen Elizabeth. I’m not even kidding. As far as smart things go, this is up there with the wheel and the telescope.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

UP (2009)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2009-09-16
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Maybe you liked it? Click above to buy it!

Positive Experience/Entertaining? Entertaining? Sure. Good? No. I know a lot of folks disagree with me, but I just kept shaking my head almost from the very beginning.

Technically any good? The CG was incredible, as you’d expect from a Pixar movie. The acting was great, too. The basic premise was solid, as well.

Sadly, those are the only good things I can say about this movie.

Everything else, and I mean EVERYthing else, was contrived and stupid. From the talking dogs to the insane ease at which the lead characters achieve their goals to the weak reasons for conflict that stop the movie from being about 20 minutes long.

I don’t have a problem with a house being carried off by balloons. I can accept anything in a movie if the universe is constructed in a way that makes me believe these things are possible. All Up does is make me believe that anything to save the characters and further the plot is possible, including rock-stupid choices made by uninteresting, predictable characters and acts of god so common, the Deus Ex Machina Corporation would be made a Fortune 500 company from the royalties it would collect from this movie.

How did it leave me feeling? Angry because this movie had the ingredients to live up to or even surpass the Pixar level of greatness set by films like Toy Story or Wall-E. However, this movie fails on every level Pixar films usually succeed on. It’s not clever, it doesn’t resonate, and all it does manage to do is make you glad you’re not staring at a blank wall.

Final Rating? NFI – NetFlix It if you’ve got really little kids and want to show them something stupid.

Put simply: there’s no reason a kids movie needs to be this dumb.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

SURROGATES (2009) (preemptive strike)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2009-09-14
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Watch the trailer

Positive Experience/Entertaining? Wow, this could be a sequel to the unfortunately bad iRobot. So, it looks like it’ll be a big fun romp, but ultimately shrugworthy.

Technically any good? FX sure look nice (if not a little simplistic), but the idea of Bruce Willis’ idealized robot body looking like Bruce Willis with a bad wig doesn’t seem like science fiction to me, but complete and utter fantasy. Writing-wise, this story seems to happen in an interesting enough universe, but the premise seems pretty weak to me. That doesn’t mean the movie won’t be good, but it doesn’t mean it will be good, either. In fact, I’m pretty sure it won’t be any good because of the director and the star.

I like Bruce Willis, but he made that last Die Hard movie. The last movie I saw from Jonathan Mostow, the director of Surrogates, was U-571 which was about as contrived as a movie can get. No wait–my mistake, Terminator 3 was the last movie he made and I saw that, too. It was terrible, too.

Amusingly, the trailer bold proclaims: “BASED ON THE GRAPHIC NOVEL.”

Funny, I’ve never heard of the graphic novel. I’m a comic fan, but that doesn’t mean I’m going to assume the movie will be good because it was based on the comic. In fact, odds are it’ll likely be crap since Hollywood fails most of the time when it comes to adapting great comic stories.

How did it leave me feeling? there was a time when I’d be happy to rush out and see a big dumb actioner like this one. But in today’s economy, I don’t really want to spend $10-$15 (depending on where I see it) on a movie that looks as dumb as this looks. I’d be more likely to Netflix AI, Minority Report, i, Robot, or even 6th Day than spend money on Surrogates.

OK, maybe I wouldn’t Netflix 6th Day.

Final Rating? NFI – NetFlix It: that’s what I am likely to do, assuming I remember this movie even exists when it finally reaches Netflix.

Surrogates hits US theaters on September 25, 2009.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

FLOW (2008)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2009-04-16
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Buy it!

Would you recommend it? Definitely. In fact, I think most of us in the Western World are so in the dark about water, I think this documentary should be required watching.

Technically any good? While it does come across as very heavy-handed and preachy and doesn’t try too hard to present any opposing view points (though it does try), the facts it presents are undeniable and incredibly disturbing. It’s downright scary how much power big business has over the water in the ground. And just think about how important water is to commerce–as a result, water ends up being the number 3 commodity behind oil and electricity. Yeah. I didn’t know that either. Another fact it presents is that humans account for just 10% of the water use in the world. The rest is split unevenly between agriculture and business–the majority of which goes to business.

How did it leave me feeling? Angry, for two reasons. First, because no one seems to be aware of or have a problem with these giant companies using and controlling so much water. Second because the film pretends that a few isolated victories against these corporations means that we can stop them. Protests have stopped some companies from essentially stealing water, but Coca-Cola, for instance, is a huge company. They didn’t lose that battle in India, they just put their resources someplace else instead of wasting time with a bunch of protesters. So, I could have done without the corny, “speak truth to power” BS and stuck with the fear-mongering since that’s what is needed.

Would you sit through it again? YES! I want to go over the facts presented again and try to pick up on things I missed the first time through. This docu is jammed with interesting stuff and interesting people.

Seriously, watch this movie!!

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

HARVEY (1950)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2009-04-14
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Buy it!

Would you recommend this? Definitely, if you’re looking for a sweet movie that’s maybe just a bit darker than you’d expect. It’s not dark, but wasn’t as warm and light as I thought it would be.

Technically any good? There’s only a bit toward the end where the script starts to let us down–it’s just a slow patch where I found myself confused as to what the heck the movie was doing. However, everything around that slow patch is pretty solid. The movie is based on a Pulitzer Prize-winning play and it shows in the witty dialogue and ironic situations. The acting is as spot-on as you’d expect. However, I found Jimmy Stewart’s pantomime to be a bit less convincing than I would have liked, though I’m sure it was fine for the day and certainly didn’t knock me out of the movie.

How did it leave me feeling? Warm and fuzzy inside. I usually don’t like to feel that way, so I give the movie even more credit for making me not mind. Three-cheers for being a bit darker, too. I’m sure if someone ever (god forbid) remade this movie it would be a good deal lighter.

Would you sit through it again? I would sit through it again, but it’s one of those movies that does a great job–so good that I don’t think I’d want to sit through it again for a while.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

SLEEP DEALER (2009) (Preemptive Strike)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2009-03-24
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

watch the trailer

FIRST OFF: THIS TRAILER CONTAINS SPOILERS! BE WARNED. I watched it and was annoyed seeing, or rather hearing, what sound like major plot points given away in the cheesy voice over.

OK, now on with the pocket review:

Positive Experience/Entertaining? Well, if you’ve seen enough trailers you can spot the ones made on a budget. This trailer felt like one of those and sadly, I think once you see past all the cheesy overproduction of the trailer you can see something that might be a good movie. (Sadly because most people won’t bother to see past the cheese to the very meaty concept.)

Technically any good? First off, I think this is what we, in the US, would call a b-movie. As in, low budget. It’s from Mexico and based on the fact the trailer allowed not a single line of dialog to be heard, I’m guessing it’s in Spanish. That’s what bugged me the most about this trailer–we have no idea if the film is even in English.

NOTE TO MARKETING PEOPLE: If people are going to be turned off by a non-English-language movie, they won’t likely stick around for the whole film once they realize it’s not in their mother tongue. SO TELL US NOW.

FX-wise, this movie looks pretty reasonable. Acting wise, it’s hard to tell since so much of the trailer is just FX shots. From what the trailer does show us, I’m pretty damn intrigued by it. Generally speaking, it looks like this might be evidence that talented people are finally getting some of that cheaper filmmaking technology.

How did it leave me feeling? Frustrated with the state of trailer-making. If I were a marketer I’d do this film much better justice. Of course, while I’m enthralled with the concept–I can’t tell if the movie is any good since the trailer was cornball and ruined bits of the movie. But it looks interesting if nothing else.

Final Rating? NFI – NetFlix It. Definitely looks like a fun scifi flick even if it doesn’t quite live up to it’s Phillip-K.-Dickishness qualities.

Sleep Dealer opens here in the US on April 17, 2009. Click the poster image above to see the trailer.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Princess and the Warrior (2000)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2009-03-18
Categories | $ | Comments (2) »
listen via talkr

Buy it!

Positive Experience/Entertaining? Geh… kind of. I guess. But annoying as hell, too.

Technically any good? ARG! NO! It meanders all over the place and is frustrating at every turn. The characters in the movie do everything against logic yet somehow (duh, because the writer wants it) they are able to get away with their rock-stupid choices.

Seriously, at almost every point of this movie, there is a character that is doing something ill-advised, illogical, or downright STUPID and yet, fate (the writer) allows things to generally work out for the characters in the end.

I think the film was trying to be some sort of fable, but ends up being very uneven and contrived.

The acting was perfectly reasonable, but no amount of good acting could undo the rest of the flaws of this film.

How did it leave me feeling? FRUSTRATED. I had to have one of my venting sessions afterwards because it was just a mess. I really like Tom Tykwer as a director–I loved Run Lola Run and enjoyed Winter Sleepers quite a lot. However, The Princess and the Warrior was just annoying as hell to sit through.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

WELCOME TO THE DOLLHOUSE (1995)


by ThePete 12:06 pm 2009-03-17
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Buy it!

Watch it online!

Positive Experience/Entertaining? Well, I enjoyed it, but you might not. To say this movie is dry is an understatement (but I like dry).

Technically any good? I think it manages to do exactly what it tries to do. It’s a little meandering, but not in any way that really harms the film. Don’t expect a clear plot, though–it doesn’t have one. It’s more like a series of events in this young girl’s life mashed into the span of a few days. If you’ve heard of the absurdist genre, then you’ve found one of the few films in existence that can be called absurdist. Think parody without being funny and you kind of know what absurdism is.

The acting is spot-on from the cast–though I can’t say being boring, whiny, suburban types is that difficult to play. Heather Matarazzo is pretty amazing as the lead.

How did it leave me feeling? Entertained, but dryly so. You might say that if William Shakespeare had grown up in the modern suburbs and was Woody Allen, this would be one of his tragedies. Nothing epic, mind-blowing or tremendous, but a bitingly accurate commentary of modern suburban life where everyone suffers and there’s no happy ending.

Final Rating? SIYL – See If You Like. It’s VERY dry.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

TERMINATOR SALVATION (2009) (Preemptive Strike)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2009-03-16
Categories | $ | Comments (1) »
listen via talkr

Watch the trailer.

Positive Experience/Entertaining? I guess watching the trailer was a positive experience. Honestly, Terminator 3 was such crap I really am not expecting much from Terminator 4. So, with that in mind, it sure looked better than the last one.

Technically any good? The FX look amazing. The FX are at the level I’ve always wanted them to be at for a Terminator film that takes place in the dark future the first (and best) movie in the series originally predicted. Everything looks great–the robots, the ships, the nuclear leftovers that were once America’s cities–it all looks pretty awesome.

It’s very sad that Stan Winston isn’t around to see his Terminator design used so effectively. :(

Story-wise, I had some problems, however. Based on the trailer, the movie shows in detail what the first film only talks about–the moments that lead up to the first Terminator being sent back in time. With that in mind, don’t we know how this movie will end already? And then there’s a moment in the trailer that strongly reminded me Battlestar Galactica. So much so that I’m wondering if this couldn’t be a prequel to that show.

How did it leave me feeling? Definitely curious and definitely interested, is how it left me feeling. However, in today’s world of $12.50 ticket prices and a lousy economy, I’m probably not going to be rushing out to see this film. I’ll definitely catch it once it hits Netflix, however.

Final Rating? NFI – NetFlix It for sure–it looks like it’ll be a fun romp. However, I’d rather spend my $12.50 on six subway rides and a bag of Fritos.

That’s another sad thing–when Terminator 2 came out, I remember thinking how unimpressive the premise was. I remember wishing they had just made a prequel instead of a sequel. Now that they have I guess I’m sad that they couldn’t do more to convince me in the trailer that this would be worth my money. It’s the only other Terminator film I’ve wanted them to make.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

QUEEN, THE (2006)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2009-03-11
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Buy it!

Positive Experience/Entertaining? Definitely! It put a human face on these people we know only from the news.

Technically any good? Everything was very solid. The acting was incredible. The script was tight and the story was believable. The only “however” I have here is that the title suggests the movie is actually about the Queen of England. It really isn’t. It’s only about a part of her life. As such, I found it disappointing.

Maybe it was because I was alive and paying attention during the time period the movie takes place and as a result I didn’t need the review of events the film puts its viewers through. That’s not to say it wasn’t a nicely done review, I just wanted to know more about her life. I mean, of all of the incredible things Queen Elizabeth II has lived through, they picked how she dealt with (former) Princess Diana’s death. It was an interesting period, but surely, World War II, or the Falklands, or even the build-up to the Iraq War would have made for better cinema.

How did it leave me feeling? Definitely happy that I saw such wonderful performances from Helen Mirren and Michael Sheen, but ultimately disappointed that we didn’t get more of a history lesson. I won’t even go into how it was definitely a pro-British-Royalty propaganda movie. (Talk about white-entitlement issues! SHEESH!)

Final Rating? NFI – NetFlix It. Worth seeing for the good acting, but ultimately, I don’t think it’s really that worth seeing.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

SWORD OF DOOM (1966)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2009-03-10
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Buy it!

Positive Experience/Entertaining? Wow–this movie is pretty incredible. Sadly, it’s also got some major flaws that aren’t entirely the director’s fault.

Technically any good? This is one of those rare occasions where I will include what I’d consider a mild spoiler. So here, I offer a SPOILER WARNING. That’s not to say that I’m about to divulge a plot point or anything that might ruin the movie for you. However, this might change the way you view the film or it might even influence you to not bother seeing the movie. So, please keep that in mind as you read the next paragraph. YOU HAVE BEEN SPOILER(ish) WARNED!

SPOILER(ish): This film was to be the first of a series of films based on a huge novel. Sadly, the sequels were never made. As a result, there are quite a few plot lines that are never actually resolved. One MAJOR plot line is included in that, sadly. END SPOILER(ish).

This is very frustrating as this film is really amazing. The acting is superb from almost everyone in the cast and Nakadai, in particular, is INCREDIBLE. Sadly, the ending is simply not satisfying, but keep in mind that just about every other damn thing in the movie is.

FX, for the period, are spot-on. Most of the time, I found myself visually convinced the lead was really slicing into his enemies and sometimes really grinding that blade in there, too. Yikes! OH and the fights were all REALISTIC. None of this BS wire-work that is way to common place now. No gravity leaps or super-powered limbs. Just good, old fashioned (literally) sword fighting.

How did it leave me feeling? Disappointed (see spoiler) but definitely entertained. If films as good as this were still made today, I’d love to see a remake done and perhaps a sequel or two. :)

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

WATCHMEN (2009)


by ThePete 4:29 am 2009-03-06
Categories | $ | Comments (1) »
listen via talkr

Positive Experience/Entertaining? Definitely. This movie could have been MUCH worse. A movie for grown-ups about super-heroes. Go figure.

Technically any good? There were a few glaring exceptions, but generally the FX were spot-on. The story, for anyone who knows the graphic novel, is solid and thankfully, the film sticks with it for the most part. The script is tight and includes enough of the original dialog to make the purist in me happy (the cinematography did, also, thankfully). The acting was generally spot-on, as well. I think there were a couple of weak spots acting-wise and I couldn’t quite tell what country one character was from because of their shifting accent, but, generally, no one was so bad as to knock me out of the movie.

Two flaws that jump out at me: some of the makeup and the music. I liked the use of pre-existing songs, but the score, while reasonable music on it’s own, didn’t really fit anywhere it was used. The makeup was a little too caricaturish and not accurate enough for a generally realistic looking film.

How did it leave me feeling? Definitely satisfied. I may be biased, however, as I’m quite used to seeing Hollywood screw the pooch on super-hero movies for decades. However, as far as I can tell, this movie was… actually good. I know–it feels weird for me to even say it.

Final Rating? GSN – Go See Now. It’s got a lot of interesting things to say about humanity. It holds together pretty well and is a pretty faithful adaptation if the source material (which happens to be one of my favorite books of all time). BEWARE: this IS a super-hero movie, but it’s NOT FOR KIDS. It’s actually more violent than the comic it is based on and there’s nudity (of both genders, so everyone can enjoy it! YAY!)

PLEASE NOTE: as I write this, I just got home from seeing it. It’s 4:21am as I type this. I just might feel differently about this movie with more distance between it and me. But for now, I really did enjoy it quite a bit!

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

MUTANT CHRONICLES (2009) (Preemptive Strike)


by ThePete 4:33 pm 2009-03-03
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Watch the trailer

Positive Experience/Entertaining? As I sat down to watch the trailer, I expected it to look like a loud, obnoxious and stupid movie. As I watched the trailer, I was actually pleasantly surprised. I am curious to see this movie now.

Technically any good? This is definitely an FX-driven movie and the FX look pretty standard for the action movies of today. One of the things I really like about how the film looks is the cross of time periods. Something anime has been doing for years is mixing design elements from different time periods creating a look that you can’t quite put a calendar date on. I really dig this kind of thing and it’s used in Mutant Chronicles. Of course, the poster gives the time period away and manages to not show off any of this cool production design, so don’t let the Photoshop-special above, bias you necessarily. Then again story-wise, the trailer makes the film look like your standard xenophobic action movie where the heroic white men must fight against the freaky outsiders. However, the above-mentioned mix of time periods intrigues me and there’s a reason “fear of the other” movies do so well–they’re often a lot of fun.

How did it leave me feeling? Definitely interested to see the movie. However, in today’s economic climate, I can’t say that it made me want to drop $12.50 on a theatrical movie ticket. Buuut, once it hits Netflix, I’ll definitely be checking it out on my flatscreen :)

Final Rating? SIYL – See If You Like big action movies and can afford the movie theater ticket. Don’t expect the next Raiders of the Lost Ark (if it even comes close, I’d be surprised) but it looks as good as a Hellboy, to me anyway.

Check out the trailer for yourself by going here: http://www.apple.com/trailers/magnolia/mutantchronicles/ Read more of my Pocket Reviews at http://pocketreviews.net

Posted via email from thepete’s posterous

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

DEATHTRAP (1982)


by ThePete 12:23 pm 2009-02-25
Categories | $ | Comments (2) »
listen via talkr

Buy it!

Positive Experience/Entertaining? YES. It’s been a long time since I’ve seen a movie for adults that actually respected my intelligence and entertained me in a fun way at the same time.

Technically any good? Based on a play of the same name, this movie is pretty tight script and story-wise. There is almost nothing I would have done differently and there was no point in which I was bored. The movie tells its story, develops its characters and slides you to the edge of your seat with subtle skill. The acting from Michael Caine, Dyan Cannon and Christopher Reeve is is solid and very convincing.

The only flaw, I felt, was the music–while there was nothing wrong with it, in theory, I felt it was jarring in a movie that simply didn’t need any music. The performances and the editing are enough to pull you along and keep you enveloped. The perfectly reasonable, but fairly period, music knocked me clean out of the film.

How did it leave me feeling? Definitely entertained and definitely satisfied. It made me want to read the play and maybe even want to be in it. :)

Final Rating? SIYL – See If You Like intense but not terrifying moments. There are some definitely adult themes here, but for intelligent adults looking for a fun movie that won’t make you feel like you’re being spoken down to, this is a perfect pick.

If you haven’t seen this movie, don’t talk about the plot with anyone. Conversations about this film with even those who haven’t seen it are tantamount to spoiler mine fields that are very likely to destroy your first experience watching this film.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

TIME BARBARIANS (1990)


by ThePete 12:16 pm 2009-02-24
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Buy it!

Positive Experience/Entertaining? Well, I’ve got to say no, not really. I know it seems silly to even review a film like this, but hey, I watched it, might as well write about it. But no, this was not a positive experience.

Technically any good? This is your standard, bad b-movie, designed to entice dumb teenage boys to watch in the hopes of finding some nudity and there is a bit of it, so that’s nice for those of us who enjoy seeing topless women. Of course, one of them gets raped, so you might want to bear that in mind.

Aside from the rape scene, the film is generally what you would have expected to see on MST3K since it’s pretty much on the level of Hobgoblins (and even shares a cast member). The acting is as flat as you’d expect, though I never blame the actors. The story is damn near non-existent, though I have to say it’s more coherent than what we’ve got going on Battlestar Galactica, so there is that.

How did it leave me feeling? Achy neck from shaking my head so much. Even as a dumb b-movie, this isn’t one I’d recommend. I also found it kind of weird that while we see a topless woman get raped, during the healthy, nice sex scene between consenting adults we see later on, there is no nudity. Kinda sad if you ask me. I always prefer to see boobs in a positive situation.

Final Rating? DNS – Do Not See. There are loads of better (read: more fun) bad b-movies out there (even with nudity) if you’re interested in doing your own MST3K-style DIY quipathon.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS (2009) (Preemptive Strike)


by ThePete 5:04 pm 2009-02-23
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Positive Experience/Entertaining? based on the trailer? I’d say this movie is bad for all of humanity. You know? There was a time when I would have wanted to see a movie like this–it was the 1980s–a time of shallow, petty, self-centered thinking, when it was still easy to think of a world in terms of “us” versus “them.”

The trailer makes me wonder if the director has grown-up at all since then.

Technically any good? I have to admit that I am seriously biased against Tarantino’s films. The only one I’ve ever liked (and I do love this movie) was True Romance and he only wrote the script. I thought all the others he’s made have been over-rated and ultimately kinda stupid. This movie, again based on the trailer, looks no different.

Sure, the FX will look great–it’s QT, his movies are always slick looking. They’re just lacking in any interesting story or characters. Speaking of story, the story of this movie looks amazingly simple and uninteresting. Not to mention amoral and encouraging the audience to feel good about being violent again.

We can’t feel good about our war on terror, so we’ll feel good about killing Germans.

Yeah, that’s just what we need.

Acting-wise? Who cares? It’s a QT movie. Good acting doesn’t really matter. It’s all about TheSlick.

How did it leave me feeling? It left my skin crawling. How Brad Pitt agreed to do this movie after reading the script is beyond me. The trailer illustrates one of the few things that was wrong with World War II on both sides–the absurd hatred of the other side.

Now Tarantino is going to glorify that hatred.

Yeah, there was a time when I would have loved a movie like this. But then I grew up.

Final Rating? DNS – Do Not See. Let’s not encourage this kind of storytelling. Let’s ignore QT for a while in the hopes that he’ll go back to telling actual stories with actual characters, like he did in True Romance. Wouldn’t that be nice?

But don’t trust my opinion–click on the poster image above and watch the trailer for yourself and see how good it makes you feel.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

TheBlurb: Ignorance must really be bliss, or else why would so many people embrace it?
updated on 12/05/09 13:44:16 Change it! Archives