This is why I don’t want broadcast TV anymore.
I spotted this story on Engadget back in December (original here: www.engadget.com/2011/12/08/high-school-senior-kills-canc… ) but have intentionally been sitting on it to see if the mainstream news would run with the story or just continue covering the same old Santorum (I’m not just referring to the Republican). Typically, this amazing breakthrough (“the Swiss Army Knife” of cancer treatments) has not become a major story in the news. Cancer kills more people in the US than terrorism kills around the world. I lost a college friend and a grand father to it, I know three people fighting it now, the current statistics say that one-in-three adults in the western world will get cancer. Yet the USG spends hundreds of billions (even trillions) of dollars fighting terrorism while cancer gets infinitely less and the press does nothing but exploit this focus on war and ignores the more realistic threats to American life (along with it’s hopefully treatments). Why are America’s priorities so screwed up?
No sooner do I post episode 25 of the 666cast which encourages us all to turn off the TV news to avoid it’s stupifying effects, than do I stumble across a post on Frederic Guarino’s tumblr linking to “Tomgram: Juan Cole, The Media as a Security Threat to America” on TomDispatch.com. In part Juan Cole is quoted in the post as saying:
The great Pakistani deluge did not exist, it seems, because it was not on television, would not have delivered audiences to products, and was not all about us. As we saw on September 11, 2001, and again in March 2003, however, the failure of our electronic media to inform the public about centrally important global developments is itself a security threat to the republic.
Earlier today, Frederic also reblogged this:
further proof US media is insular to the point of being ridiculous
Wow.
All right, so I guess I should have said turn off ALL mainstream media in the US, instead of just TV. :\
Jesus, (if we can’t learn what’s really going on in the world) we’re fucked.
“WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange “no longer wanted” and not a rape suspect, Swedish prosecutor says on website”
— Huh?? .. CNN headline .. Confusing day..
Confusing day? Confusing MORNING. That’s how fast this story broke and unbroke—for me, anyway.
I woke up to this story this morning and since I woke up early, I took a nap and when I woke up, the arrest warrant had been dropped.
This is one of those ridiculous stories that pops up, distracts the crap out of us for days or weeks and then goes away forever. Sure, it’s already obvious the charges had no connection to reality, but will that stop TV’s idiot-pundits and repulsive Republicans from casting aspersions on Assange for the next week or two just to give their True Believers something to be hateful of?
I always wonder about these sorts of “Flash in the Pan” “news” stories. They always seem so incredibly concocted and contrived that I imagine they were completely planned in order to distract from some other story that someone doesn’t want getting out. Sure, it’s just my imagination, but these stupid stories come up and even though they’re obviously useless, the Mainstream Media makes sure that they’ll distract us for several days. What are we missing in the meantime? Even if this Assange/rape story wasn’t cointelpro by the USG, the time lost to this story will cost other stories face time. What if one of those other stories was really important?
Thanks to our wonderful newsmedia of shitheads, we may never know.
It’s not like this is the first time a story like this has come along, either. Remember that time that creepy dude claimed to be the murderer of JonBennet Ramsey? It was fodder for all the headlines for about a week. If you believe the MSM, everyone wanted to hear about this transgendered guy in Asia who had suddenly decided to admit his guilt. Then, as quickly as he had appeared on the national scene, he was gone.
While I don’t imagine Assange will disappear as that creepy dude has, I believe these accusations will hang around for a week or two and then disappear—just long enough to serve as another useless distraction.
it’s like a pop-up on my computer asking me some irrelevant question I don’t really care about.
If you’re not familiar with what I call “the Absurd Disconnect,” in a nutshell, it’s when people look at the sky and tell you it’s green—or when someone tells you it’s safe to go swimming in a part of the ocean that just had millions of gallons of oil dumped in it—like that. There’s been a lot of this kind of thing going on lately and it’s continuing.
In this instance, I saw a link on Newsweek’s Tumblr to an article on Newsweek’s main site claiming to be “What the JetBlue Guy Says About the Economy” well, it wasn’t that. I was hoping to literally hear Slater’s take on the job situation, but alas, I got some reporter-guy’s opinion of it. Part of his opinion was based on USG docs. Yeah, yeah, let’s trust USG docs. They’ve never been wrong before. Anyway, so here’s the part of the article that pissed me off the most (italics are mine):
For the past year, the U.S. economy has been whipping roughly the same number of workers to do more, produce more, serve more, with each passing week, without much assistance, and without much of a raise. Over the past four quarters, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported, “unit labor costs fell 2.8 percent as output per hour increased faster than hourly compensation.” But when the BLS reported the second-quarter productivity numbers on Tuesday, Aug. 10, the results were a little shocking. For the first time in several years, productivity actually fell—at a 0.9 percent annual rate. Workers put in more hours, but output didn’t keep up. They simply can’t run any faster.
via newsweek.com
OH, REALLY? Just the past year?
Since college, I can’t name a single boss I’ve ever worked for who didn’t hire me for one thing who didn’t then pile on extra responsibilities. Sometimes those responsibilities were tenuously related to the work I was paid to do (so I dealt with them) but *every* time I didn’t get a raise to make up for the extra work. I finished college in the early 90s, right when the downsizing trend was kicking into high gear. Shortly thereafter, it stopped being a trend and became business as usual.
Seems like some folks never noticed that. I remember Paul Krugman, not too long ago, saying something about how he was worried high unemployment would stop getting apologized for and would just be assumed to be part of the system. He hadn’t noticed that it’s already part of the system. But that’s what he gets for being one of those people that base their reality almost entirely on what they are told by “authorities” and not what they’ve experienced or heard from other “grunts.”
I worked for a company from 1999 to 2006 and held two positions. In that time, the first position never saw a raise. Not for the 7 years I worked there. In the other position I only got a 75¢/hr raise after I demanded $1/hr. This was after they tried to get me to become the receptionist for the entire company, sort the company’s mail AND do my original job of running my department (which was something I did only because my boss, the actual head of the department, wasn’t doing it).
That’s just one example.
It’s amazing to see the media just now catching on that employers are greedy. What’s next? Choice words for executives for this “new trend” of owning expensive luxury cars and wearing expensive suits?
Yes, that op-ed will no doubt be written by Sherlock Holmes—for only someone as brilliant as the fictional detective would be able to make such profound observations on humanity today.
>_<
Why is the media so slow to do it’s job? Why are we so willing to put up with being shit on by our bosses? The last time I had an office job where my boss tried to dump more duties on me, I put my foot down and they survived without me having to do work I didn’t sign up to do. The work I was not willing to do was absorbed by other employees whose job it already was. Later they laid me off when all of my duties got folded into other folks’ jobs (d’oh!). They offered to hire me elsewhere in the company but couldn’t tell me how much more I’d be making but that I’d be working directly for the top executives at the company. Bleh—not for me. So, I turned it down. Turns out the woman who got the job ended up being forced to work 6 days a week without OT. Yep. She felt compelled to not risk the gig because she was a single mom.
This was three years ago—before the recession.
Well, it was before the officially recognized recession, anyway.
That’s the other falsehood that the media and other “authority” types haven’t noticed yet. Thanks to a number of factors, our economy is on a downward trajectory and has been for some time. It was just easier to ignore before.
Shame we can’t all just face reality and do something about it.
What are those factors?
Outsourcing
Offshoring
a money system not based on anything tangible
lousy regulation
corporations having the “right” to “give” as much as they want to campaigns
These five factors, I believe, are behind every problem facing America, and the western world, really.

SCIENCE GETS IT WRONG AGAIN! Stupid science. This is like that time they lost a WHOLE PLANET. I think I’ll read the Bible now. It hasn’t changed in two thousand years!!! THAT’S HOW RIGHT IT IS.
/ sarcasm
Right, so this story popped up in my Tumblr stream and like an addict to crack, I can’t not reblog it since it’s right up Website666.com’s alley!
Found via brentbillock:
Wow. Wow. Wow. This is not only a very well written critique of the way this story has been misinterpreted. It’s also a cogent examination of the way nearly all news is now consumed. The headline IS the story, because no one has the attention span to click through and read what the facts behind the poorly-written headline really are.
Case in point, the Time cover, suggesting abuse of women would be the consequence of our leaving Afghanistan. Even though the abuse pictured took place during our stay there. Even though the story itself does not predict greater or lesser abuse of women based on our presence or absence.
Puppies Never Existed!
So this little item made me mad all day yesterday, and continues to do so, so I’m just going to get this out here.
Let’s get this straight. Triceratops existed. It totally did. That’s why we have all those fucking bones. I’ve seen them. They are real. The news is that there is evidence that Triceratops was not a distinct species, but a juvenile form of Torosaurus. As illustrated so convincingly above, bitty, sweet puppies can turn into massive, drooly, jowly dogs. But that doesn’t mean there’s no such thing as puppies.
This is not hard to understand. Nor is it hard to explain. Which brings me to my point.
The way popular media report on science, even simple and relatively trivial stories like this, is entirely fucked.
The headlines to these stories are not borne out in the actual content in any way. In this particularly egregious example from the consistently egregious Daily Mail the ‘Triceratops never existed’ bit is included in the headline to look as if it’s a quote from a source in the story. Of course that quote doesn’t appear in the story, and isn’t attributed to anyone. As far as I can tell, no one connected to the story has made any categorical pronouncements about the non-existence of Triceratops. But that’s the part anyone reading it will retain. “Oh, now these “scientists” say my favorite dinosaur wasn’t even real. What the fuck, science?” It might as well have been written by a Juggalo.
And what’s sad is that a really interesting opportunity to explain how science actually works has gotten trampled by a stupidity stampede. What really happened is that scientists have taken a look at existing evidence and have come up with a hypothesis that may better explain what they are looking at. So now ideas are being adjusted, and other scientists will look at the evidence and see if what’s been hypothesized can be disproved or explained in a more compelling way. And there will be some disagreements, and new facts will come to light, and there will be further hypothesizing and we will eventually end up closer to the truth than we were before.
BECAUSE THAT’S WHAT SCIENCE DOES, BITCHES.
But instead the idiotic report on this has only led to confuse and irritate and, worst, give stupidly false ammunition to science-deniers. Creationist whackaloons are going to be shouting “what about the Triceratops that never existed?” going forward for years now. And they’ll just confuse the issue for the general public who doesn’t have time or inclination to think this shit through and then we have endless “teach the controversy” school board bullshit and the whole world gets stupider again. (And if you don’t believe me, I dare you read even a small sample of the comments on that Daily Mail story.)
In other news, Pluto also still exists.
Sure, sure—Pluto still exists, but Pluto the planet does NOT.
Speaking of which, the brain dead HuffPo headline isn’t inaccurate—it’s just not specific enough. What they should have said was “Triceratops species never existed.”
But that’s HuffPo for you—pretending to be a real news source just like Drudge and Fox News—only with 90% more celebrity cleavage.
The rest of the reblog is spot-on, though. The media is a joke.
“I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman church, by the Greek church, by the Turkish church, by the Protestant church, nor by any church that I know of. My own mind is my own church. All national institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian, or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit. I do not mean by this declaration to condemn those who believe otherwise; they have the same right to their belief as I have to mine. But it is necessary to the happiness of man, that he be mentally faithful to himself. Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe.”
—
Thomas Paine, Glenn Beck’s crush (via mohandasgandhi) (via savagemike) (via danielholter)