Skip to content
thepete.com - » John McCain thepete.com

TheAdvertising:
:gnisitrevdAehT

Your Womb. Property of the State for Over 2000 Years: McCain ‘08

by ThePete 6:40 pm 2008-11-02

Compliments of ThePete and johnmccainisyournewlogo.com

Sorry, starting to feel a little tired–good thing the election is the
day after tomorrow!

Still, deep down, anti-women’s-choice people really do feel they have
the right to force women to stay pregnant no matter what. It’s as
though these people think if women stop having babies humanity will
die off or something. Full grown people die every day–some in
unjustified wars based on lies, but these people will be damned before
they let a woman decide what she lets live inside of her.

Women are but holy vessels for God’s life-giving power!

OR they are living, breathing, thinking people with the same rights as
men.

I’m anti-abortion myself, but you’ll note that I am pro-choice.
Patrick Henry said “Give me liberty or give me death.”

That was Henry saying “I will kill and/or die for my freedom.”

But I think it is safe to say that Henry wasn’t flippant about killing
a person.

If it’s OK to go over to Iraq to kill for Iraqi freedom, I’d say it’s
just as right to allow a woman to have an abortion if she wants to be
free of health issues, complications and sometimes even death. In
fact, I’d say an abortion is easier to tie to freedom-fighting than an
invasion of Iraq.

Because I Was Only *Accused* of Corruption in 1989: McCain ‘08

by ThePete 2:56 am 2008-11-02

Compliments of ThePete and johnmccainisyournewlogo.com />

The Keating Five, kids. Look it up.

Part of the problem for over 20 years: McCain ‘08

by ThePete 5:48 pm 2008-11-01

Compliments of ThePete and johnmccainisyournewlogo.com

Isn’t it neat how he’s going on and on about all this cool stuff he’s
going to do once he gets into the White House?

Kinda makes you wonder just what he’s been doing all this time he’s
been in government, doesn’t it?

White Men. Telling people what to do for over 2000 years. McCain ‘08

by ThePete 11:36 pm 2008-10-30

Compliments of ThePete and johnmccainisyournewlogo.com

Am I going too hard on the race thing? Hey, after Obama gets into
office the bad stuff won’t be my people’s fault any more! SWEET!

:P

Killing the unborn is wrong. Waiting 18 years and sending them to Iraq is Right: McCain ‘08

by ThePete 11:33 am 2008-10-30

Compliments of ThePete and johnmccainisyournewlogo.com

That’s what I call a late-term abortion!

I just love the Republican “culture of life” that sends American young
men and women into harms way to kill and be killed. How can you be pro-
life and pro-war at the same time?

If you are only interested in protecting American lives then I think
you’re being pretty lame. That said, why aren’t you pro-Cancer-
research? Cancer is a MUCH bigger threat to American life than
terrorism.

Because White Men Really Are Better Leaders: McCain ‘08

by ThePete 2:47 am 2008-10-29

Compliments of ThePete johnmccainisyournewlogo.com

It’s true, isn’t it?

Come on, name one good black President of the United States!

Betcha can’t!

George W. Promise I’d Win in 2008 if I Only Played Along: McCain ‘08

by ThePete 1:39 am 2008-10-28

Compliments of ThePete and johnmccainisyournewlogo.com

Are you like me? Would you have actually voted for McCain in 2000 had
he won the Repub primary if Bush hadn’t? Do you wonder what happened
to that John McCain who ran 8 years ago? I do. I miss that man–he was
a leader with integrity and honor. So what happened?

It seems to me that he made a deal with Bush. “Support me in
everything, vote with me 90% of the time, support the war, vote
against the toture ban, support me in the 2004 debates, as a huge
storm hits New Orleans you are to put celebrating my birthday with me
above any concerns for Katrina victims (McCain brought a cake). Do all
of this and I’ll give you all of my psycho amoral campaign guys so you
can definitely get elected in 2008.”

To which McCain responded, “Yes, Godfather…and may your first child
be a masculine child…”

“Thank you. Now kiss the ring… And pull my finger! Heh-heh-heh!”

All right, so that may not be exactly how the exchange went, but you
have to admit the change from 1999 McCain (honor, real patriotism) to
2008 McCain (says whatever is required to get elected) is pretty
extreme.

Because White Male Presidents Represent 232 Years of Tradition: McCain ‘08

by ThePete 11:54 pm 2008-10-26

Compliments of ThePete and johnmccainisyournewlogo.com />

Don’t you think it’s time to give the white man four years off? I
mean, we’ve survived George W. Bush, haven’t we? How much worse could
the black guy be?

Nothing Says Change Like a 72 Year-Old White Guy McCain ‘08

by ThePete 8:32 pm 2008-10-25

Compliments of ThePete and johnmccainisyournewlogo.com.

No offense to my dad, but Caucasian men in their 70s are not exactly
known for bring change to entire countries. Especially rich ones with
7 homes.

CNN, Chevron & McCain, OH MY!

by ThePete 3:05 am 2008-10-16

utterli-imageSaw this on my iPhone tonight and couldn’t help but think "Wow, CNN brings us a pro-McCain headline sponsored by Chevron. Taste that irony!"

Seriously, even Fox News is admitting that Obama won this final debate and CNN.com says "McCain puts Obama on the spot."

Was Chevron that specfic when they bought the ad space?

Drill, baby, drill, indeed.
Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterlireply-count Replies.

2008 Debate #3 (FINAL) Wrap-Up #debate08

by ThePete 12:54 am 2008-10-16

Wow–this was a little surprising tonight. I feel like things were pretty damn fun this time out. The ninety minutes really seemed to fly by. I do think the first two debates set the bar pretty low, however. Neither were very exciting and zingers were very rare. The same goes for this one on the zingers front (in fact there were none), but because the moderator kept things moving this was a lot more lively.

I did prefer this format to the other two, also. The podiums of the first prezy debate were all “official” and whatever, but there’s an air of stiffness you get with them, as well. The “town hall” style debate we had last time was more loose and freeform, but it also gave McCain a chance to wander around like a lost Alzheimer’s patient and Obama a chance to sit like he was a sleezy lounge singer in between sets.

Tonight’s format was just about perfect. Both of the candidates had the opportunity to look relaxed when they wanted to and look like upright guys when they needed to. I think the format was also very conducive to having an actual debate, too.

And now to the winner.

One thing that was both the same and different from previous debates was Obama. He definitely won this one as he has the other two. However, before it was just on points. There were very few critical things that Obama did to make me, as an independent voter, feel more strongly about voting for him. In the previous debates I felt the same going out as I did going in–about both candidates. But I had already decided to vote against McCain and Senator John makes me dislike him every time he opens his mouth.

The bizarre thing about McCain is that I totally would have voted for him in 2000. He seemed to me to be a good man and a good leader. Then he became Bush’s lapdog and never came back. Nothing tonight made me go back to my old feelings about him, either.

Obama on the other hand (for the first time) really addressed a lot of the questions the McCain campaign had brought up and essentially shot down the potential damage those questions could bring. It was great to see the whole Ayers issue addressed with both of them right there. McCain could have continued to take issue, but he really couldn’t have. The same with ACORN and that stupid health insurance fine for small businesses McCain brought up again this time. I was glad he did because this time Obama did more than just blow him off like he did last time. It turns out small businesses will get a pass on the fine while big businesses (who can afford, it won’t).

All in all, Obama actually made me like him more. I still wish we had more options. I’m an independent and until I see three or more parties have a serious shot of having their candidates win, I won’t be happy.

Now, before anyone accuses me of being some sort of liberal hippie-type, here’s how I fall on all the big issues:

I’m an anti-gun-control, pro-choice, anti-abortion, anti-war, small government, pacifist who enjoys violent movies, and caring about people who need caring for. I also feel there have been enough white men running things. Is that independent enough for you?
Sure, you could go check out CNN.com’s coverage of the third and final Presidential debate of the 2008 campaign, but for some good -n- balanced coverage of the debates check out CSPAN.org and to see what us bloggers and other Internet types thought of the debates, check out C-SPAN’s debate hub here: debatehub.c-span.org

Or you could just keep your dial tuned to ThePete.Com for all of my coverage of the debates, which you can check out here: thepete.com/tag/debate08/

Oh yeah and watch FactCheck.org for a nice deconstruction of the debate that goes after each candidates failures to be accurate.

McCain Shocked at Racism Charge and I’m Not Pt 2

by ThePete 5:47 pm 2008-10-13
utterli-image
The pic attached to this post is a screencap from an article on CNN.com that I blogged about yesterday (article here: http://www.cnn.com/…index.html blog here: http://thepete.com/…m-not-pt-1 ). I wanted to revisit this story because it illustrates the use of the Straw Man Argument. This is something I blogged about the day before last (here: http://thepete.com/…ic-defense ).

If you notice in the screencap, Democratic Congressman John Lewis explains how he sees McCalin rallies becoming fertile ground for new racism. He explains how George Wallace never had to "throw a bomb" or "fire a gun" but that he did create "the climate and the conditions that encouraged vicious attacks." Lewis feels that McCain and Palin are creating a similar atmosphere at their rallies.

Now, let’s take a look at what Senator John McCain (presidential candidate, if you hadn’t noticed) said to defend himself against Lewis’ statements:

"Congressman John Lewis’ comments represent a character attack against Gov. Sarah Palin and me that is shocking and beyond the pale," he said in a Saturday afternoon statement released by his campaign.

"The notion that legitimate criticism of Sen. Obama’s record and positions could be compared to Gov. George Wallace, his segregationist policies and the violence he provoked is unacceptable and has no place in this campaign. I am saddened that John Lewis, a man I’ve always admired, would make such a brazen and baseless attack on my character and the character of the thousands of hardworking Americans who come to our events to cheer for the kind of reform that will put America on the right track."

Did you see what he did? In amongst a bunch of other things that sound true enough, McCain lies by suggesting that Lewis was comparing "legitimate criticism of Sen. Obama’s record and positions" with the hateful stuff George Wallace did. This is another use of the Straw Man Argument–where McCain sets up something that he can easily knock down (like a little man made of straw).

It’s true–comparing legitimate criticism of Obama to George Wallace’s racism is not right and is not fair. Anyone would agree with that.

But that’s not what Lewis was doing. Lewis was saying that the atmosphere of racism is created at these rallies.

Like Palin did the other day in "defending" against accusations no one had made (as I blogged about here: http://thepete.com/…ic-defense ), McCain is dodging the issue and shows Lewis the same disrespect he claims Lewis is showing him.

Of course, McCain is a powerful white politician who is well known for claiming the mantle of American Hero at every turn, while Lewis actually is an American hero spending his entire life fighting racism.

You might want to try addressing his issues directly and refrain from the disrespect.

To be fair, Senator John, you have made efforts to address the growing racism at your rallies. In that same CNN article, Barack Obama is quoted as saying: "But John Lewis was right to condemn some of the hateful rhetoric that John McCain himself personally rebuked just last night,"

The thing is that you’re not doing enough, John. You seem to only let white people into your rallies. Do you want to be President of the United States of America, John? Or just President of the United States of White People?

I suppose that IS where you find all the money.

But the ultimate point here is that once again we see that McCain is no longer an American Hero, but a man who embodies an awful lot of bad things that politicians have become known for. Using the Straw Man Argument, he distracts from what is really going on. As I mentioned in my Palin post from the other day, sadly, most politicians use this technique.

Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterlireply-count Replies.

McCain Shocked at Racism Charge and I’m Not Pt 1

by ThePete 1:37 pm 2008-10-12

utterli-image
In an October 11, 2008 article at CNN (here: http://www.cnn.com/…index.html ), Senator John said that comments made about McCalin rallies were "shocking and beyond the pale,"

But what were those comments and who said them?

Democratic Congressman John Lewis is a civil rights leader and has been active in the civil rights movement for his entire life. He addressed the same crowd that heard the "I Have a Dream" speech (yes, the one from Martin Luther King Jr.) and he recently admitted to being reminded of a much more racist time in American history.

That CNN article quotes Lewis as saying:

What I am seeing reminds me too much of another destructive period in American history. Sen. McCain and Gov. Palin are sowing the seeds of hatred and division, and there is no need for this hostility in our political discourse," Lewis said in a statement.

"George Wallace never threw a bomb. He never fired a gun, but he created the climate and the conditions that encouraged vicious attacks against innocent Americans who were simply trying to exercise their constitutional rights. Because of this atmosphere of hate, four little girls were killed on Sunday morning when a church was bombed in Birmingham, Alabama," wrote the Democrat.

McCain says those charges are "shocking" and "beyond the pale."

Right.

Is it really that shocking to imagine racism coming from a crowd of white people? Seriously–how many non-white faces do you see at any McCain rally?? That alone says that the McCain/Palin ticket is not seeking out any sort of real balance in the support they are getting. It’s just white people.

So, the idea that a black activist, who has been fighting racism his entire life, would see racism come from a long succession of carefully selected white crowds at McCalin rallies might be shocking is just sad.

Come on, Senator John, what happened to you? You used to be a decent man.

Now you’re playing off an American Hero’s criticism of you as though he’s playing politics. And even if Lewis is playing politics the way you react is with RESPECT, JOHN. RESPECT.

Playing the "shocked" card disrespects a great man and the great people whose votes you are courting.

Be humble, John.

Be graceful.

Ah screw it, you’re losing, McCain–you might as well keep digging your political grave.

Watch for part 2 of this post which will talk about McCain’s use of the Straw Man Argument in defending against Lewis’ attack.
Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterlireply-count Replies.

FactCheck.org Takes On Prez Debate #2

by ThePete 6:15 pm 2008-10-08
utterli-image
FactCheck.org has released their report on last night’s debate. Check out a summary of their findings along with their entire analysis here: http://www.factcheck.org/…_no_2.html

As usual, according to the report, it seems like both McCain and Obama showed their stripes as politicians, each making several factual errors and oversimplifying themselves into corners.

Sadly, We The People are the ones who lose when the candidates concentrate more on winning than informing the public.

Here are a few things in the FC.o report that I found interesting:

Blaming each others parties for the economic crisis. From the summary: "Both candidates oversimplified the causes of the financial crisis. McCain blamed it on Democrats who resisted tighter regulation of federal mortgage agencies. Obama blamed it on financial deregulation backed by Republicans. We find both are right, with plenty of blame left over for others, from home buyers to the chairman of the Federal Reserve."

Nice to see someone admitting the current economic crisis might be a little more complicated than either party is admitting.

Now, we’ve all heard of candidates getting their opponent’s policies wrong, but check out this excerpt: "McCain misstated his own health care plan, saying he’d give a $5,000 tax credit to ‘every American’ His plan actually would provide only $2,500 per individual, or $5,000 for couples and families. He also misstated Obama’s health care plan, claiming it would levy fines on ’small businesses’ that fail to provide health insurance. Actually, Obama’s plan exempts ’small businesses.’"

Yep, McCain screwed up HIS OWN health care plan AND Obama’s. Well done, Senator! Yes, everyone makes mistakes, but if you’re going to get your own plan wrong during a debate, you might not be the right person to take on much bigger challenges than remembering your own crap. I mean, talk about Reaganomics! ;)

It wasn’t all McCain’s McMistakes, either–Obama made a few and here’s one I liked as I’m a big fan of avoiding nuclear for any and all reasons: "Obama said, ‘I favor nuclear power.’ That’s a stronger statement than we’ve heard him make before. As recently as last December, he said, ‘I am not a nuclear energy proponent.’"

Hey, Barry, you might want to make up your mind there, since we’re kind of in the middle of an energy crisis (whether we want to admit it or not). As much as I hate Nuclear it is among the handful of things we will likely be forced to adopt in order to solve this crisis. I hope we can just go with wind and solar–but I’m off-topic.

The FactCheck.org report goes into a LOT more detail. Hit the link at the top of this post to read the whole thing.

Ah, politics. It’s a shame that this whole thing will be over in less than a month!

HA! Who am I kidding? Unless Obama gets a (literally) certifiable landslide our wonderfully flawed voting system will keep us busy for a while.

Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterlireply-count Replies.

@petersantilli the “I can do i…

by ThePete 11:45 pm 2008-10-07

@petersantilli the “I can do it all, now, I can do everything, everytime, immediately, I can!” bit was probably my fave of the night. As if.

@SisterSafetyPin how could we …

by ThePete 11:43 pm 2008-10-07

@SisterSafetyPin how could we independents not vote Obama? As usual, the only viable alternative to the Dem is no alternative at all. :\

@TwitHeads No Lehman Brothers?…

by ThePete 11:33 pm 2008-10-07

@TwitHeads No Lehman Brothers? I’ve got like 5 bucks to burn! Come on, man! What could go wrong? ;)

@cspan Thanks for passing on t…

by ThePete 11:32 pm 2008-10-07

@cspan Thanks for passing on the feedback about the split-screen. I know it would be tough to do tonight w/the format. Next time, maybe?

@cspan Thanks for the kind wor…

by ThePete 11:31 pm 2008-10-07

@cspan Thanks for the kind words TheSpan! ;) Times are a little tight at ThePeteCave so I may have to pass on the CSPAN swag :) Thanks, tho!

@kariedwards Which saves you f…

by ThePete 11:27 pm 2008-10-07

@kariedwards Which saves you from radiation? I don’t think it’s stop-drop-&-rolling or duck-&-cover–I think it’s kiss-your-butt-good-bye :)

TheBlurb: "How can one talk about life without saying sometime it's going to end? It makes the value of life all the more precious."
updated on 11/01/08 14:45:18 Change it! Archives