Skip to content
thepete.com - » inflation thepete.com

TheAdvertising:
:gnisitrevdAehT

Why I’m Against the Bailout

by ThePete 4:48 pm 2008-09-29
utterli-image
Last week, my mom sent me an email that started with the sentence: "Would we be better or worse off if there was no bailout of these banks?"

I was going to just answer her question right there, but then I realized my answer would make for a great blog post. So, here you go, Mom! Sorry it took so long, but I got a little distracted with the news lately. :)

By the screencap above, you might think we’d be better off if the bailout went through. The Dow dropped more than 500 points by closing today in reaction to the bailout bill not passing the House.

If the bailout did go through, we’d see banking begin to return to normal–loans could be given again, loads of people would still have jobs, and both the USG and Wall Street would save tremendous face (after all, it was the two bodies in concert who is responsible for this mess).

Of course, those are just the good things that would happen. There would be bad things, too, that our leaders aren’t really going into.

Most importantly, in my mind, if the government really decides to spend $700 billion (about the price we’ve paid in Iraq so far), the negative impact could be pretty far reaching–especially on one part of our economy that no one likes to *really* talk about.

We have a problem in our culture–no one really likes to talk about the "i" word.

No, not impeachment.

Well, they don’t like to talk about that either, but Americans seem even more loathe to use the other "i" word, inflation.

I’m kind of a broken record when it comes to inflation. I explained my view of it in a recent blog post here: http://thepete.com/…ed-economy

Suffice it to say, when $700 billion gets injected into our economy, it will be a lot of new money floating around. When you increase the supply of money, the existing money drops in value (as dictated by the law of "Supply and Demand"). When the bailout goes through, it’ll send the dollar’s value plummeting.

That’s what can really make for a weak economy, BTW. A weak dollar.

So, in the end, sure, a bailout is going to keep our lives more or less like they are now. We’ll be able to borrow again and bankers will keep their jobs and life will be grand until the real meaning of "trickle-down economics" is learned–when the lost-value of the dollar trickles down from the rich (who will use the new money first) to the poor (who will only see the benefits of that new money once the value of their own money drops–it’s a little abstract, my apologies).

Another thing any bailout will fail to do is guarantee this won’t happen again. We are all familiar with the Great Depression and the stock market crash that preceded it. Was there a bailout then? I don’t know.

Regardless, we, as a country, survived the Great Depression and I’m sure America will survive this, whether we have the bailout or not.

So, why does it matter? It matters because the bailout lets people get away with breaking the rules. Hell, the bailout itself is breaking the rules of the free market.

I’m no free-marketeer, but the way I look at it, if you’re going to bother to make rules, you should bother to follow them. If you don’t want to bother to follow them, then change them and follow the new ones.

Breaking your own rules just makes you look unprofessional.

I’ll post more about rule breaking tomorrow…

…assuming I don’t get distracted by the news again. :\

Tomorrow’s post on the rules will also involve socialism vs. capitalism, conservatives vs. liberals, and probably even McCain vs. Obama, if I can get really creative.

So:

Bailout = good in the short term (status quo, status quoed)

Bailout = bad in the long term (inflates inflation, weakens our overall economy and our individual power to buy stuff, doesn’t prevent another economic explosion, also lets bad guys get away with it)

Well, Mom? I hope that answers your question.

Either way, we’re in for a world of hurt. Luckily, most of us are broke, so we won’t feel it as much as the rich folks panicking right now (though we may have trouble buying things that are about to get more expensive).

For all the folks on Utterli who got notified about this post, I hope you don’t mind! I hardly ever notify everyone I’ve friended about posts, so hopefully you’ll forgive me if you’re not interested in this post.

Also, I’d love to hear what anyone reading this thinks. I really want to learn more about our money and how it works. I’m really nervous that it’s really as simple and truly as messed up as it looks.

Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterlireply-count Replies.

This is What the End (as we know it) Looks Like

by ThePete 7:59 pm 2008-07-05
drop.io: simple private sharing

So, I grabbed this off of Drudge back on July 1, 2008.

Yeah, SUV sales in decline, Hummer my sell the brand, Saudi king says “deal with it.”

If you don’t live in a city or town with exemplary mass transit, it’s time to pick up that skateboard because the end is seriously nigh.

I and many others have been watching this situation get worse and worse since 2000. High oil prices, inflation, and now high food prices all tell us it’s only going to get worse because the causes of our problems (Peak Oil/Middle East wars and inflation) aren’t going away and probably never will.

Just an FYI.

Now go run and hide from your responsibility. ;)

You know you wanna…

Banks Borrow $50 Billion this Year: A Bad Sign?

by ThePete 12:16 am 2008-02-19

The above screencap comes from a February 18, 2008 article at FT.com (here: http://www.ft.com/…fd2ac.html ) and it reports on some seriously scary stuff–at least, in my uneducated opinion. All I’ve done to educate myself is read some stuff on the ‘net and swing by the Fed website a few years back to try to make sense of things. Their FAQ these days is a bit more thorough, but clear answers are still not easy to come by. So, us uneducated types have to pay special attention to what reporters say about the central bank of the United States.

From the quote in the last paragraph in the screencap above, to me, it looks like we’re having a replay of the sub-prime mortgage mess. Instead of people unable to pay their loans back we’ve got banks using "garbage collateral nobody else wants to take."

The FT article also gives us an interesting glimpse into how our money works: "The Fed announced the TAF tool on December 12 as part of a co-ordinated package of measures unveiled by leading western central banks to calm money markets.

The measure marks a distinct break from past US policy. Before its introduction, banks either had to raise money in the open market or use the so-called %u201Cdiscount window%u201D for emergencies. However, last year many banks refused to use the discount window, even though they found it hard to raise funds in the market, because it was associated with the stigma of bank failure."

Up until I did that wave of research a few years back, I had no clear idea where our money comes from. When I was a little kid I remember asking my dad about it. He told me it was printed. I asked him if that was all there was to it, how come we can’t just print more?

Then he explained to me how inflation works. The more money that exists, the less it’s all worth. A few years back I learned that the Fed, as a central bank, is the source of *all* of our money and that they loan money to all banks at interest. This is confirmed in the above quote from the article. Money is definitely borrowed on interest because there is a metaphorical window you can get money from at a discount price.

The thing is, to pay it back plus interest, don’t we have to have more money than we started with? Where does that money come from if *all* money is borrowed?

To me our economy already seems like a huge Uroborus (http://en.wikipedia.org/…/Ouroboros ) that will inevitably, eventually collapse in on itself.

It also seems to me that we may be seeing the collapse begin–though it might be a while before it finishes.

Am I overreacting? Possibly–we survived the Great Depression, after all.

Still, I’d rather say something and be wrong than be right and silent.
Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterz Replies.

Bush’s Keen Eyes Notice Economy Getting Worse

by ThePete 6:10 pm 2008-02-03

Source for the above screen cap: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news

I meant to post about this a couple days ago when I first saw it. It’s like Bush is paying attention to our failing economy in time-release caplet-form.

Seriously, everyone’s talking about it already–some of us have been talking about it for years.

I don’t think all the jobs in the world added will help when the US government borrows $1 trillion for wars. That kind of borrowing causes some major inflation–as in, it drives the value of the USD down. I don’t see how giving more people low-valued dollars will help things.

So, now, with talk of the Fed dropping interest rates by another half-percent, one wonders if they’re not just making it worse–especially since they’ve already dropped rates a startling 1.25% in the past couple weeks and that hasn’t helped.

I think it might be time for America to stop spending money abroad, both in the form of wars and other expenditures, as well (like foreign aid to countries, sadly).

I think our economy is spread way too thin to continue to support itself. If some new solutions are tried I see things getting worse before they get better.

Of course, I’m just a guy with a blog. What do I know?

I’m just glad we have the eagle-eyes of our beloved leader, George W. Bush, on the job!
Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterz Replies.

TheBlurb: "How can one talk about life without saying sometime it's going to end? It makes the value of life all the more precious."
updated on 11/01/08 14:45:18 Change it! Archives