Skip to content
thepete.com - » hypocrisy thepete.com

TheAdvertising:
:gnisitrevdAehT

TORTURING DEMOCRACY a New Documentary

by ThePete 3:49 pm 2008-10-17
I’m a big fan of taking the good with the bad. If it’s true, even if it’s bad, I want to hear about it and I want to deal with it, the sooner, the better. Sadly (to me), not everyone shares this view. Many people want to deny and ignore as much as they can when they don’t like it. When the Abu Ghraib story broke a few years ago, I really didn’t want to see those photos. I really didn’t want to believe that my government would torture.

I had heard that government officials would take suspects and have them "interrogated" in countries where torture was legal. This disturbed me enough. When the waterboarding stuff broke, I wasn’t shocked, but I was disappointed. Then, when Bush insisted that "we don’t torture" I knew it was just Orwellian doublespeak and that we do torture.

"Torturing Democracy" is all about America committing acts of torture. According to the official website (http://torturingdemocracy.org/ ) the documentary: "…relies on the documentary record to connect the dots in an investigation of harsh interrogations of prisoners in U.S. custody - and points straight to the top. Timely and powerful, at its heart the film is about the rule of law - and how the government pushed it aside despite the fierce resistance of many on the inside."

Attached to this post is one of the excerpts available on the official site and it features Richard Armitage, Deputy Sec of State under Colin Powell, talking about how he was waterboarded (as part of training) and how he definitely considers waterboarding a form of torture. He also mentions that he’s ashamed that the discussion about whether waterboarding is torture or not is even being considered.

If you’re in the Washington DC area, watch this docu on WETA at 10pm tonight (10/17/8). Check out a complete listing of channels and times here: http://is.gd/4gLf

OR just go to http://TorturingDemocracy.org/ to watch the entire movie right now.

I have yet to watch it, but plan on doing so this weekend. I’ll post a review next week.

Be responsible for what your government does–watch this movie and be offended as you should be. Then, vote accordingly.

Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterlireply-count Replies.

Adbusters Takes Credit Where There Ain’t No Credit

by ThePete 2:55 pm 2008-10-17
utterli-image
Truth be told, I didn’t get very far into the article that the above screencap came from. I didn’t need to get very far into it to realize that Adbusters, a group I’ve respected in the past, has stopped being a discerning, critical voice speaking against hegemony and has become part of the problem.

In a blog post from ten days ago (here: http://www.adbusters.org/…trike.html ) they make the claim that they are, in fact, behind the spending slowdown America is experiencing. They claim it all started with their "Buy Nothing Day" and "Turn Off TV Week" and it slowly grew from there.

"Culturejammers" they claim, took things further and began "advocating a General Consumption Strike as the appropriate tool for reshaping the basis of our economies."

Someone even wrote a manifesto that was "printed in the pages of Adbusters, emailed to friends and discussed in cafes."

Wow, cafes, you say? WOW. That’s like SERIOUS distribution!

Then they say:

And now, at the brink of an economic collapse, increasing numbers are joining the Consumption Strike. Already our actions are having profound consequences. The New York Times reports that consumer spending is down sharply, the first quarterly decline in two decades link and that consumer borrowing fell for the first time in a decade. And according to the Wall Street Journal our general decrease in consumption is putting retailers out of business and pushing mall vacancy rates to their highest level in seven years.

Pardon me while I ROFLMAO.

Guys at Adbusters, I hate to break it to you, but people aren’t rejecting capitalism. They’re not following your proud teachings.

People aren’t buying stuff because of one simple reason:

SHIT IS EXPENSIVE.

They’re not turning off their TVs because you guys told them to. They’re doing it because the INTERNET IS COOLER.

I didn’t sell my car in 2003 because I was moved by some campaign organized by a bunch of activist types. I sold it because I got tired of spending hundreds of dollars a year on a vehicle that spewed toxins and wasted space.

I didn’t stop watching TV because of "Turn Off TV Week", I stopped watching TV BECAUSE TV IS STUPID.

Seriously, what you guys have done is become part of the problem.

You guys bitch and moan about how lame the system is–how everything’s shallow and consumption-oriented. You tell the system to stop telling you what to do.

But how do you do it? By telling all of us what to do.

You want to replace someone else’s hegemonic "ism" with your own. Why not let us all decide for ourselves what is best for ourselves?

Claiming credit for influencing people, is just trying to capitalize (!) on the misfortune we’re all experiencing. It’s like at the Wall Street rally I went to a few weeks back where people were handing out communism flyers because clearly the ONLY alternative to capitalism is communism!

Fight isms with isms. Good plan, guys.

Ever worry that maybe your ism isn’t the one, true ism?

Ever worry that one ism doesn’t fit all?

Ever worry that you might be full of shit?

Ever worry that pulling the same old cliched, holier-than-thou crap liberals are famous for might cost you the support of people who actually support your cause?

You should worry…

…because that’s what’s happened with me.

You guys are just as bad as anyone else trying to get their way. Trying to determine what’s right for everyone is simply wrong–even if you insist that it’s for our own good.

And this lying you’re doing to your own followers, that’s just wrong, too. Man, I never even heard of "Turn Off Your TV Week" before reading that article and you want me to believe you’re responsible for people watching less TV?

Screw you guys.

Thanks for getting greedy and missing the point of your own existence.

Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterlireply-count Replies.

The Great "Evil" (Socialism) Hits Wall Street

by ThePete 11:45 am 2008-09-22

utterli-imageIt’s the end of an era on Wall Street, according to that screencap from CNN.com, it’s the end of the era of the Wall Street investment banks. According to the article that the headline links to (here: http://money.cnn.com/…/index.htm ) the government is taking over the last investment banks, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley. This is a move that: "allows Goldman and Morgan to scoop up retail banks and to streamline their borrowing from the Federal Reserve. The shift also is aimed at removing them as targets of nervous investors and customers, who brought down their former rivals Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch this year."

So, basically, this was done to strengthen these huge banks and to stop them from crumbling under the pressure of the other banks crumbling. If these banks did crumble we’d have a bigger economic meltdown.

At least, that’s how I understand it.

HOWEVER, the cry of "socialism!" is a common thing in our country. Obama’s been called a socialist, anyone who wants to see free health care for everyone has been called a socialist and now I’m calling the USG socialist since so many seem to think the government doling out money is socialism.

This puts the USG in the same category as the Soviet Union and the Nazis (apparently). They were all considered socialists–and thanks to that, we know that socialism IS EVIL.

OK, the real irony here is that socialism is NOT evil. It’s the people who practice it that can either be corrupt or not. When you ignore hundreds of thousands of homeless and jobless people in our cities, that’s OK. But when you ignore the plight of our crumbling banking system that’s just wrong.

Amtrak? The airlines? Banks? They’re all corporations and all have been bailed out by the government–by our tax dollars.

The people who cry out against socialism think it’s fine when corporations need help, but not individuals.

When individuals need financial help it’s because they didn’t work hard enough or they’re lazy or druggies or hippies.

When Wall Street needs help, no one really talks about why they need help, they just get that help.

Sure, the news and pundits explain that "these banks are too big, they can’t be allowed to fail" but what does that really mean?

It means that the individual is not important. Only the system matters.

That doesn’t just sound like socialism, that sounds like <em>communism</em>.

What it all sounds like to me is hypocrisy.
Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterlireply-count Replies.

Beijing Olympics Protest Utter from PixelFish

by ThePete 11:56 pm 2008-04-09

The following comes from fellow Uttererer PixelFish (utterz.com profile: www.utterz.com/~h-PixelFish/profile.php ):


Art from http://tibetanbuddhism.tribe.net/…1a89ec7c46
by M. Parisi

In London, protesters attempt to douse the Olympic flame: http://www.cnn.com/…index.html

Violence in Tibet as the Tibetans themselves protest:
http://www.independent.co.uk/…02732.html

Quixote from Shakespeare’s Sister speaks about Tibet:
http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/…tibet.html

Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany, to boycott the opening ceremony:
http://www.sfgate.com/…ate/detail

Human Rights In China:
http://www.hrichina.org/public/

A list of violations of China’s human rights:
http://www.christusrex.org/…facts.html

Organ harvesting among condemned criminals* in China:
http://firedoglake.com/…-olympics/

(*Gonna have to add that "criminal" often means any opposition to official policy in China.)
PixelFish’s Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterz Replies.

I’ve spotted another piece of great Beijing Olympics protest art and I’ll be posting it soon.

Sexism in 2008: We’ve Got a Long Way to Go Baby!

by ThePete 10:06 am 2008-02-01

Saw this in Hollywood last night. Sorry it’s a little blurry, but I didn’t feel like it was really worth a clearer shot :)

First Yorkie bars that aren’t for girls, then a study that tries to blame women for breast cancer and, now, we’ve got guys like this who still think it’s appropriate to connect a woman’s ability to perform in bed to a woman’s ability to perform in the White House.

I don’t hear anyone accusing Bush of shooting blanks in the War Against Terror, despite the fact that he’s doing exactly that. I mean, TALK about impotent against the terrorists! He has just flaccidly flopped around in the Middle East while the only things *rising* are inflation and the cost of oil. Instead of $145 billion, perhaps he should try some Viagra for the economy.

Just imagine what sex must be like with Laura.

"The time for diplomacy has past. You’re either with me, or against my orgasm."
Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterz Replies.

TheBlurb: "Happy new year, but keep your fingers crossed." -Bill Moyers
updated on 01/07/09 11:34:14 Change it! Archives