Skip to content
thepete.com - » George Clooney thepete.com

TheAdvertising:
:gnisitrevdAehT

SOLARIS (2002)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2009-01-28
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Buy it!

Watch it now!

Positive Experience/Entertaining? Sadly, no. While I can say that this remake of the 1972 original is a more entertaining film than the original, I can’t say it was entertaining.

Technically any good? The characters were vaguely drawn and nothing they did made me care about them one way or the other. The relationship Clooney’s character has with his wife is boring and unspecial and, as you watch, you wonder why they were together at all. FX-wise it was amazing–great space footage, but sadly, that’s all there is to like about this film. It is nice to see Clooney in a scifi setting, but that’s not enough to make this a scifi film worth seeing.

How did it leave me feeling? Disappointed. I used to be a fan of director Steven Soderbergh’s but after seeing this and The Limey I can’t help but wonder where the mind-bending stuff he did in Schizopolis went. Is Out of Sight even worth Netflixing?

Final Rating? DNS – Do Not See – I was really hoping for something mind-bending, but all I got was a very predictable (even if you haven’t seen the original) 99-minute episode of The Twilight Zone. The thing is, Rod Serling could have made this premise work really well in a 30-minute structure. A movie just seems a bit much for this premise. (SPOILER ALERT: If you’ve seen Forbidden Planet you’ve seen a more dynamic and entertaining interpretation of the premise of Solaris.)

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

MICHAEL CLAYTON (2007)


by ThePete 12:00 pm 2008-02-15
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Positive Experience/Entertaining? Without a doubt–while it ends a bit too happily for my tastes, I do feel that this is an important movie with an important message.


Technically any good? Solid acting, solid story, great (invisible) directing, and a plot that splits it’s time between comfortable predictability and believable and interesting twists all add up to a technically good film. What’s also nice is that I actually felt something for the characters–even the bad guys to a certain degree.


How did it leave me feeling? Like my opinions on big business and corruption were reinforced. :) It also left me feeling like I had a very satisfying movie-watching experience.


Final Rating? STM – See This Movie – it’s like a less complicated Syriana and almost as important a movie.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

George Clooney On Sudan


by ThePete 11:30 am 2008-01-31
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

The above is a screencap of a video of George Clooney reporting to the UN on things he saw and experienced on a recent official visit to Africa (see it yourself here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/…220735.stm# ).

This isn’t some jaunt he took so he could pick out a new child to adopt. Clooney went in as a representative of the UN–cornily called a "UN Peace Ambassador," he’s actually doing some great work. He spoke with people in the Darfur region who had been displaced by violence brought upon them by the Sudanese-government-sponsored militia that rape and murder locals to get them off the land. If memory serves this is happening because the land has oil underneath it.

I couldn’t find a transcript of what Clooney said, so I’ll paraphrase:

"One-hundred-percent of these people blame the government for displacement. It’s not disease, not disaster, not an act of God, not famine–the government of Sudan. I spoke with a woman who had been raped and set on fire two days before and she asked me to please send the UN. Not the US, not the UK, not the Russians, but the United Nations. They are believing what you are telling them. Don’t let them down."

In case you couldn’t tell he’s guilting the shit out of the UN to actually bother to help Africa.

He’s got a tiny bit of history with Africa, you see. A couple years ago, he and his father, himself a veteran newsman, literally sneaked into Darfur to witness some of the atrocities that have been committed there. They weren’t with the UN then, but they did it anyway.

George Clooney is *finally* someone we can look up to. Sure, he’s one of those "phony Hollywood-types" with a villa in Italy. But he’s actually doing something good with the gobs of money he’s made off of us.

How many "Hollywood-types" do that? How many rich people do that? Not only is Clooney a good actor and filmmaker, but he’s a good person and I’m tempted to call him a hero.

He seems to understand that every thing each one of us does is a message to the future and has said on more than one occasion that he doesn’t want to be on the wrong side of history.

The people of Sudan need money, supplies, weapons, stability. On two wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the US has spent about $1 trillion. Just *think* how much good that money could have done in Africa.

I’ve long ago given up on the mainstream news for any information other than breaking news of disasters, so I don’t know if they’ve covered Clooney and what he’s done. But I’d much rather be hearing about Clooney and what he’s witnessed than whether or not Hillary faked her cry-fest a couple weeks back.

As far as I’m concerned, George Clooney should get a medal.
Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterz Replies.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

TheBlurb: Why can't everyone support Iranians and their quest for liberty?
updated on 06/30/09 22:57:59 Change it! Archives