Tag Archives: capitalism

Via: http://buy.louisck.net Louis CK cuts out the middle man and makes a LOT more money distributing his video online

Following in the footsteps of Trent Reznor (of Nine Inch Nails fame), comedian Louis CK distributed his latest comedy special online, bypassing traditional distributors and apparently made a mint. Reuters reported (goo.gl/EaKsy):

C.K. said the $200,000 he has has profited so far is “less than I would have been paid by a large company to simply perform the show and let them sell it to you.” But fans would have had to pay about $20 for the video, he estimated, rather than $5.

Also, the D.I.Y. approach allows him to keep the rights to the special, and allows fans more freedom in how they can view it, since the download is not encrypted or regionally restricted.

C.K., the creator and star of the FX show “Louie,” says production of the video cost around $170,000, covered largely by the cost of tickets for the two shows he filmed and edited together for the special. Developing his website to sell the special cost about $32,000. Sales of more than 110,000 copies have so far brought in more than $500,000. PayPal charges and other costs left him with “around $200,000 (after taxes $75.58),” he wrote.

To me, this is awesome news. I love it when people are able to get past the traditional gatekeepers of the entertainment industry and sell directly to the consumer. It saves everyone time and effort and usually makes it better for the consumer. I’m not sure of CK was being serious when he said that all he ended up making off of the experiment was $75. $200,000 is an awesome take, though, and I hope he keeps going with it. Imagine if he took his show off of TV and just let people download each ep for a buck.  Or maybe he could just post each ep on YouTube and see how much the ads on their net him.

I’m fascinated by this new direction because it upsets the traditional distribution model for media that has been in place and in power for basically the last century.

My only question is how Louis CK would have done if no one knew who Louis CK was. Like Trent Reznor, capitalizing on his own success thanks to that century-old model allowed him to build an audience, effectively, on someone else’s dime. How does someone make $200k without having to go the traditional route, at all? Has anyone even managed to do such a thing yet?

Posted in TheBusinessMindedPete, TheFinancialPete | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

It’s hard to do it because you gotta look people in the eye and tell ‘em they’re irresponsible and lazy. And who’s gonna wanna do that? Because that’s what poverty is, ladies and gentlemen. In this country, you can succeed if you get educated and work hard. Period. Period.

It’s hard to do it because you gotta look people in the eye and tell ‘em they’re irresponsible and lazy. And who’s gonna wanna do that? Because that’s what poverty is, ladies and gentlemen. In this country, you can succeed if you get educated and work hard. Period. Period.

Bill “Poverty is a lack of hard work” O’Reilly, for Fox News

(via reallyfoxnews)

When are people going to realize how ignorant this statement is? Social mobility is becoming more and more limited each day, and poverty has nothing to do with hard work. It is blatantly obvious that,

1. Bill O’Reilly has never had a service job in his life

2. inherited wealth, and 

3. has never studied sociological theory or any sociology related topic in his life, or else he might actually understand the concepts of social mobility and oppression/greed.

(via killtvmakestuff)

I wonder how many of his fans he just called “irresponsible and lazy” in this?

(via feministslut)

A guy who gets paid millions for working an hour a day gets to call full-time minimum-wage workers irresponsible and lazy?

[animated image: Judge Judy sits in her courtroom in front of an American flag and New York state flag. She glances to towards the right side of the image and gives an incredulous smirk.]

(via afunnyfeminist)

The 99% posters I see MOSTLY complain about this lie.  This piece of shit we all get fed that “getting educated” will put us on the path to success.  Now we all took out student loans to pay hyper-inflated tuition prices for bullshit degrees that don’t matter when there are NO JOBS you can put that degree to work with.

of course he’s insulting his fans and dissenters alike, but the difference is his fans will agree with him.  They’re the 53%-ers, the ones who think it’s okay to work 100 hours a week to make ends meet.  Because they believe this bullshit myth of “hard work.” 

Newsflash: The people telling us we just have to “work hard” have no fucking idea what that really even means.  It’s just like being told you didn’t pray hard enough for something to come.  If you’re provided for, you’re working hard enough, whether that means broadcasting one hour a day on television or working 100 hours a week with no benefits.  If you’re not provided for, then you’re not working hard enough.  Even if you’re working 110 hours a week.  

Just like God can’t lose, Capitalism can’t lose either.  Corporations can’t lose.  It’s not their fault when the economy collapses, it’s not their fault when they don’t create any jobs for people to “work hard” at.  It IS their doing when things are going well, though.

(via sonic-hip-attack)

Fuck this fucktard. Poverty is not a lack of hard work. It’s a lack of luck. Fuck you rich people and fuck you Bill O’Reilly.

(via simplyopinions)

It’s opinions and attitudes like O’Reilly’s that will raise the collective temperature of the lower class to a boiling point.  History shows us that poor people, if pushed, will turn to violence to quench their thirst for “justice” or “fairness” when, really it will be about jealousy and revenge.  But what you call it won’t matter.  Back during the late 1800s and early 1900s, rich people’s homes were sacked in cities like New York.  Rich people hired guards to make sure no one would burn their homes down.  See—they weren’t common thieves—they wanted revenge and it’ll happen again, just like back then (read Howard Zinn’s “A People’s History of the United States” for more on this—it’s a brilliant history book as it is told from the loser’s point-of-view).

But the thing is, the attitude of the rich isn’t entirely inaccurate—if you work hard you are more likely to do well.  After all, success is when preparation meets opportunity.  So the rich are right in this way.  Of course, they don’t talk about the lack of opportunities. Also, just because the rich are partially right doesn’t give them license to be douchebags about it.  And the bigger the douchebag they are, the more anxious the “unprivileged” will be to pop that bag and shower in that vinegar and water goodness (sorry, metaphor went off the rails there).

Now, when the rich get all uppity about “class warfare” they’re just Orwellian-style doublespeaking.  In other words, when rich people talk of “class warfare” they’re doing it to distract us from noticing that they, themselves are committing acts of class war.

When a rich person says to a jobless, homeless or penniless person (JHP), “work hard and you will succeed!” that is class warfare.  The rich person is withholding all aid and resources from this “JHP” person.  Now consider what you do to your enemy in a time of war: you cut off their resources.

Therefore cutting funding to social programs, health programs, libraries and education is literally class warfare.  It’s wonderful since they get mad when they’re accused of class warfare, but they don’t have a problem accusing everyone else.

And capitalism is JUST like God, as one of the rebloggers above said.  And it’s just as impossible to have a rational conversation with someone who has an irrational belief in something.  

The system is failing us—and it will continue to fail us because of this absurd faith in the magical properties of capitalism.  So, until something dramatically changes, the system will continue to fall apart because the people in charge are just ignoring the problems, even denying they exist—as though belief is enough.  They’re like economic Christian Scientists.

Idiots.

Posted in Website666 | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

My Take on the latest Facebook Mess (The one where it tracks you even if you’re logged out)

I posted a variant of this post earlier on Website666.com. Check it out if you want more context, but my commentary is more meaty here.

So, even if you log out, Facebook can still track you through the magic of cookies–those little “bread crumbs” that websites leave on your computer with info about your behavior on that site or other sites.

Well, this doesn’t surprise me too much.  After all, every one of us should be aware that we’re not Facebook’s customers. Facebook’s customers are advertisers.  We are Soylent Green fed to the advertisers–aka, what advertisers pay Facebook for is made of people. Our eyes, our traffic, our behavior patterns are what Facebook customers pay for.  This is how big brother really works.  It follows you where ever you go and knows whatever you do (online).  But it’s not government watching your every move, trying to control you and manipulate you, it’s big business.

If you don’t mind having your every move tracked and exploited by Facebook, they’ll be happy to provide you with a place to connect with friends and family and a place to post links, pictures and video that you can share with said friends and family and play really stupid, time-wasting games.

I hate to sound jaded, but I don’t know if Facebook being all KGB on our asses is that big of a deal.  I mean, so what? We’re being exploited.  So?  I mean, it’s lame we don’t get a bigger piece of Zuckerdouche’s financial pie (we just get the services Facebook offers, which are easily found elsewhere), but in the end, what are we losing?

I’m not saying we’re not losing anything, it’s just that I’m honestly not sure what it is.

I know I don’t like the feeling of being exploited, but capitalism already does that to us.  When we buy a $3 cup of coffee at Starbucks, we’re not just paying a mark-up, we’re paying a HUGE mark-up that has allowed Starbucks to expand around the world and its executives to get very rich.  I don’t blame vendors for mark-ups to cover costs and salaries, but Starbucks (and many other companies) don’t charge what they need to, they charge MUCH more.  How do you think Apple ended up with so much cash laying around?  Because they only charged you for what that iPhone in your pocket cost to make?  Hell no.

We’re all being exploited every day.  Personally, I don’t like it.  But what can I do? Capitalism is everywhere.

Ha! I almost typed “capitulationism” just then.  Well, I guess that sort of fits. :\

Speaking of business, buy my book, wouldja? Thanks!

Posted in TheBusinessMindedPete, TheFinancialPete | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

And I Should Know

And I Should Know

This is an amazing account Roseanne Barr gives of what she went through on here sitcom—couldn’t stop reading it. Here’s a cutting:

It didn’t take long for me to get a taste of the staggering sexism and class bigotry that would make the first season of Roseanne god-awful. It was at the premiere party when I learned that my stories and ideas—and the ideas of my sister and my first husband, Bill—had been stolen. The pilot was screened, and I saw the opening credits for the first time, which included this: CREATED BY MATT WILLIAMS. I was devastated and felt so betrayed that I stood up and left the party. Not one person noticed.

I confronted Marcy under the bleachers on the sound stage when we were shooting the next episode. I asked her how I could continue working for a woman who had let a man take credit for my work—who wouldn’t even share credit with me—after talking to me about sisterhood and all that bullshit. She started crying and said, “I guess I’m going to have to tell Brandon [Stoddard, then president of ABC Entertainment] that I can’t deliver this show.” I said, “Cry all you want to, but you figure out a way to put my name on the show I created, or kiss my ass good-bye.”

I think her comments put an interesting coating over the thought that we’ve made progress.  She says her show is still ahead of its time and that:

Hollywood hates labor, and hates shows about labor worse than any other thing. And that’s why you won’t be seeing another Roseanne anytime soon. Instead, all over the tube, you will find enterprising, overmedicated, painted-up, capitalist whores claiming to be housewives.

This explains a lot to me after giving Hollywood a go, myself.  Seems like I just wasn’t a big enough asshole.

It also suggests to me that for all the progress Hollywood has made culturally, it’s still about fear and money.  Sad stuff.

The world might not really end this Saturday, but it might as well. We sure don’t seem to be going in any good direction.

Posted in none | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

How Ma Bell Shelved the Future for 60 Years

How Ma Bell Shelved the Future for 60 Years

Gizmodo’s Tim Wu blogs about how innovation was stopped in its tracks, effectively, due to capitalist interests.  Funny how we’re all told capitalism is great for innovation. Too bad that’s only true until innovation might damage the current business model.  Take the example of the answering machine that existed in the office of a Bell Labs engineer… in 1934.

Posted in none | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment



Display in workplace (by Liz)

Forget washing hands: “Employees must have two or more children to maintain a steady supply of low-wage workers.”

Tee-hee! This is so (sad but) true.

For more information: stickitto.com

Posted in none | Tagged , | Leave a comment

If you haven’t heard, a family’s home burned to the ground while fire fighters stood by but did nothing.It’s not like the guy wasn’t willing to pay, either.  It’s so fucked that we can’t just be nice to one another when it comes to stuff like this.  Health care, fire fighting, police services, these are all things that fall under the umbrella of “protecting citizens” and are therefore a government’s job.  Yet, for some of these categories and in some areas of the country, we have this obviously illogical view that these services should be paid for a la carte, by each person who needs them.People say America is a generous country?My ass.We’re not generous to ourselves, that’s for sure.  We’re a bunch of selfish assholes.  The rich are more selfish than most of us. Special thanks to underpaidgenius.com for posting a link to the video.  Check out his commentary.

Posted in Website666 | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Tenn. Fire Department Allows Home to Burn Down over Unpaid $75 Fee

Tenn. Fire Department Allows Home to Burn Down over Unpaid $75 Fee

From today’s Democracy Now:

In Tennessee, a local fire department refused to put out a house fire last week because the homeowner had forgotten to pay $75 for fire protection from a nearby town. The firefighters showed up to the scene of the fire and then watched as the home of Gene Cranick burned to the ground. Cranick’s neighbors had paid the $75 fee, so when the fire spread across the property line firefighters took action, but only to save the neighbor’s property. The local mayor defended the actions of the firefighters. South Fulton Mayor David Crocker said, “Anybody that’s not in the city of South Fulton, it’s a service we offer. Either they accept it or they don’t.”

Congratulations, Capitalism! You’ve cost a family their home and even their pets. YAY!!

The Free Market really IS awesome!

Posted in none | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Who is more evil? The evil or the evil that inspired it? (Google vs Capitalism)

Found this via falconieri:

“The essential problem with Google is that it no longer considers itself primarily a search engine. Instead, Google believes it is an advertising company whose search results are mere fodder for commercial messages. This is the crime Google has committed. It is not in violating the principle of neutrality, an ideal that never existed in the history of knowledge organization. Google’s crime is against human culture. Google has stolen our common knowledge and commercialized the library. The long-term cultural consequences of this deplorable criminal act are unclear. But Google’s loathsome introduction of advertising into search results is travesty that must be investigated. Now is the time to begin a substantial inquiry into Google’s practices, not because they violate “search neutrality” but because they violate the human need for commercial-free learning.”

Google’s Flaw (via azspot)

I feel like blaming Google isn’t fair.  We’ve commercialized WAY more than just knowledge. In fact, we’ve pretty much commercialized everything in our lives. 

There’s a great moment in Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey, where an astronaut is trapped outside a spaceship by a computer gone psychotic.  As the astronaut uses his forearm-mounted computer interface to try to work out a way back inside, we see, right next to the text display, a giant IBM logo.  This joke made the audience laugh out loud the last time I saw it in the theater.

When you brush your teeth, there’s likely a logo on your toothbrush.  When you drive down the street, not only are their billboards that you drive past, but there are about a half-dozen (or more) logos right inside your car—the car-brand, the brand of radio, your GPS’s brand’s logo, your cell phone, soda can/coffee cup, etc.

I remember in high school (way back in the last century) one of the school clubs ran a candy and soda shop in the cafeteria, where they’d buy candy and soda cheap and then mark it up to sell it to their fellow students.  I’ve since heard that some schools accept sponsorships from major corporations in exchange for ads placed around the school.  I recall one instance where competitors’ vending machines were banned from the school in favor of the sponsor’s.

Have you watched children’s TV lately?  I haven’t. I stopped years ago because (get ready for it) it was just too commercial for me.  The disgustingly unhealthy food they try to sell kids is shocking and the methods they use to do it, equally so. Loud music, “wacky” animation, and effective lies insist that Cocoa Puffs are part of a nutritious breakfast (they only say that because they have to admit that you shouldn’t try to survive on Cocoa Puffs alone).

Google isn’t doing anything we haven’t already done to ourselves.  They’re just doing it in a new way.  Does that make them evil?  Well, only if you consider ourselves evil for accepting so many other examples of commercialism into our lives and drawing benefits from it, as well.  You think Google should allow us to search without ads? How are they supposed to survive?  You benefit from their service, so they should benefit from you using their service.  Seems fair enough to me.

Personally, I think it’s about capitalism more than any one entity practicing it.  I mean, you can’t blame a tiger for feeding on prey.  The whole structure of capitalism demands exploitation—of workers and of customers. 

Right there is where the true evil lies, in my opinion.  Well, there and in the banks.

(And yes, the title of this post is my paraphrasing Obi-Wan’s “who’s the bigger fool” dialog from the original Star Wars movie.)

Posted in none | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment



Screencap source: www.usatoday.com/news/health/2010-08-07-cancer-costs_N.htm

From the article:

In 2009 and 2010, as the economic collapse shuddered across the globe, oncologists in California noticed a troubling trend: Three patients who had had serious tumors under control for as long as eight years reappeared in the clinic with massive cancer regrowth which, in one case, required emergency surgery.

In retrospect, this downturn in fortunes should have been predictable: The economic recession had forced the patients to discontinue a life-extending medication.

“In all three cases, the patients developed new symptoms and came in after having missed an appointment or two without us knowing that they had stopped the drug,” said Dr. Katie Kelley, co-author of a letter-to-the-editor in the Aug. 5 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, which describes the cases. Kelley is also assistant clinical professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF).

And there have been other such cases, both at UCSF and around the nation, either of patients stopping medications altogether or rationing in the hopes of making precious supplies last longer.

From me:

For purely arbitrary, man-made reasons, people are suffering and dying, after finding medicine they need to survive too expensive.

What is the difference between a mugger shooting you on the street for your wallet and a pharma company charging you more than you can afford for the drugs you need to live?

Why do we think the question “Your money or your life?” is a reasonable question to be asked?

What is wrong with our brains????

Posted in none | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment