Skip to content
thepete.com - » big business thepete.com

TheAdvertising:
:gnisitrevdAehT

CNN, Chevron & McCain, OH MY!

by ThePete 3:05 am 2008-10-16

utterli-imageSaw this on my iPhone tonight and couldn’t help but think "Wow, CNN brings us a pro-McCain headline sponsored by Chevron. Taste that irony!"

Seriously, even Fox News is admitting that Obama won this final debate and CNN.com says "McCain puts Obama on the spot."

Was Chevron that specfic when they bought the ad space?

Drill, baby, drill, indeed.
Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterlireply-count Replies.

Why Must the RIAA Harm All that is Good?

by ThePete 12:13 pm 2008-08-19
utterz-image
This morning I saw a Twitter post that said simply "Say it ain’t so, Muxtape!"

My heart skipped a beat–Muxtape.com is my favorite site for sharing music. It allows users to upload twelve songs from their computer, then creates a playlist and a URL they can share with there friends. I’ve been dutifully waiting for their iPhone app to arrive but after seeing the above screencap, can we believe we’ll ever see an app or even their website again???

Why must the RIAA be so draconian? I understand protecting copyrights, but I’m not sure how Muxtape makes their money, so I can’t imagine what grounds the RIAA has for threatening the site when all it ends up being is a site that allows users to share mixes of the favorite audio tracks–hell, at http://thepete.muxtape.com/ I have a handful of straight audio clips that aren’t even music.

And is it me, or does behavior like this from big business just make them look bad? What about the folks that actually buy music that they hear for the first time on Muxtape?

Something similar is happening with Pandora.com. Rather than looking at the site as a massive commercial for music, Sound Exchange (the group in charge of collecting royalties for musicians) is now demanding royalties so high from online music sites that the peole behind Pandora are considering shutting down.

Pandora is a site that allows you to create your own custom radio station based on the artist or song name you enter. Essentially, it’s exactly like the process you go through when choosing a traditional radio station–you know, you pick the one the plays mostly music that you like (if you can find one). Pandora.com does this all for you–pretty cool, huh? Except the royalties Pandora.com has to pay, I’ve heard, are twice what traditional radio stations have to pay. I think the excuse is that on the web so many peole can listen to the music.

I’m just going to come out and say it: fuck the free market–it is stifling the growth of music and is cutting off innovation.

The system as it is now creates boring, unrisky, music that doesn’t push art (and therefore humanity) forward. I gave up on traditional radio over a decade ago and have been getting introduced to new music through movie soundtracks and friends who are musicians. Thanks to sites like Pandora and Muxtape, I’m actually listening to new music again. Well, I WAS.

Who thought greed would be a good business model, anyway?

Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterzreply-count Replies.

My iPhone Bill Mysteries Explained! (Huzzah!)

by ThePete 12:06 pm 2008-08-14

Up until July 11, 2008, I was a prepaid customer at T-Mobile. I had two phones with them–a (product) RED Motorola SLVR and a Sidekick 3. Loved them both, but needed GPS in this new city I live in called New York (note to Mayor Bloomberg: How about tax incentives to the Thomas Guide people?). Plus, I’m a gadget freak, so I was happy to choose GPS over, you know, a map, anyway.

The thing is/was, I HATE contracts. When I was with Sprint they were the biggest dicks in the world about paying late. Yes, I’m a struggling artist. Yes, I often have little money in the bank. But, yes, I always end up paying off my bills (yes, it wasn’t always that way, but that was more than 7 years ago, so my credit report should be none-the-wiser!). Yet, when I would be late with my payment, Sprint would often suspend my account. I’d be out, suddenly finding a huge need to call my wife but unable to.

“Good thing this wasn’t an emergency,” I’d say to myself.

Sure, I could call 911 in that case, but not my wife. That seems odd to me.

ANYway, so something else I always hated about mobile phone service with a contract was that I never really knew how big my bill would be from month to month. I knew approximately, but with taxes and fees and whatever, all I knew for sure was that it would cost me more than I initially signed up for.

Likewise, when I signed up for my iPhone’s voice and data plans, I knew going in that there would be extra fees attached. But I was awoken this morning to a worse surprise–I got charged more than just “taxes and fees.”

But first things, first. Here comes the mystery charges–the stuff that always seems to change from plan-to-plan and even month to month (that conveniently goes away when you go pre-paid):

iPhone bill pt1

The above is a screencap of part of my bill. That top part is a $0.60 charge for three text messages because I didn’t want to pay extra for something I hardly ever use. Of course, that was before I realized there wasn’t a reasonable IM client for the iPhone yet–but that’s another story. Below that are the fun fees for my home state of New York. Well, plus the $36 “Activation Fee”. That kind of fee always cracks me up. We have to pay extra for them to “turn on” our account. Just a wee bit greedy there, Mr. AT&T!

Then we’ve got a true puzzler:

COUNTY GROSS RECEIPTS SURCHARGE $3.00

The county I live in needs $3 per bill? Why? I just moved here, but I wonder if this fee is something that my neighbors voted on. I mean, what person in their right mind would be like “Yes! I think the county should be able to charge my wireless carrier $3 for… for… something, knowing full well that my wireless carrier will pass that charge onto me!”

Couldn’t we just get an extra $36 taken out of our taxes every year?

Same goes for the following:

FEDERAL UNIVERSAL SERVICE CHARGE $2.96

What the hell does this even mean??? Seriously, I have no idea.

MTA TELECOM SURCHARGE $0.91

Uhhh, the only MTA I know of is the company that runs the subways. Why would they be charging me money? From what little I could find on the ‘net about this, it seems like the MTA charges cell phone users in the NYC area for the MTA. WOW, that’s LAME. So, rather than taxing EVERYONE for MTA they punish JUST the mobile phone users. Weak. After all, mass transit helps everyone–cheaper bus and train fares encourages more people to stop driving and therefore helps cut down on traffic–so everyone benefits from everyone helping.

STATE TELECOMMUNICATIONS EXCISE SURCHARGE $3.82

Looks like another tax, this time from the state, instead of the county, that the AT&T is charged but passes on to us so they don’t lose any money. Still sounds like it should come out of taxes.

Oh, this is probably my favorite:

REGULATORY COST RECOVERY CHARGE $0.91

OK, this is likely one of two things:

1) It’s the money AT&T spent in complying with regulations.

2) It’s the money the state/county/USG charges AT&T to help the state/county/USG pay for regulating wireless carriers.

Those are my guesses and either way, it’s pretty lame to charge us for the cost of business.

So, all that equates to $47.60, but since this is my first iPhone bill, the $36 “activation fee” should be missing on my next bill dropping the cost of this section down to $11.60–possibly less if the fees in this section are based on percentages. That’s not too bad, but wait–there’s MORE! You also get:

NEW YORK STATE FEE $1.20
STATE SALES TAX $5.99 (!!!)
LOCAL WIRELESS SURCHARGE $0.30
CITY SALES TAX $6.55 (!!!!!)
TOTAL $14.04

WTF is all that?? More damn taxes including TWO WAVES OF SALES TAXES!! How does both the state AND the city get off charging us sales tax?? That’s just not fair!! I should get a PO box out in Jersey and change my mailing address to that on my AT&T account and see what happens.

When I buy a bag of chips, here in Manhattan, do I get charged city sales tax AND state sales tax? I don’t think so. I think I’ll ask for a receipt next time just to be sure.

So, there’s the big mystery part of the bill solved–total charges for seemingly-unrelated-to-mobile-phone-service fees? This month: $61.64. Next month (sans activation fee): $25.64. That’s still an awful lot of money on top of a $70.00 basic charge. Hopefully that’s a little high, but we’ll see in 30 days.

The thing is, that’s not the end of the rude surprises in my first iPhone bill. I’d imagine the next surprise hit every single person who bought an iPhone on July 11, 2008. I can’t imagine why this would happen at all, but on those grounds, I can’t imagine that this happened to just me.

Check this out:
iPhone bill pt2

Isn’t that nice? For some unknown reason AT&T decided to push my billing cycle back to the 26th of each month, rather than just having it start on the 11th, which happens to be the day I actually started using the service.

So, sure, those two weeks they’re charging me would have been charged to me anyway, but who said I wanted to pay for those two weeks in my first bill?? Why not just do a billing cycle of 7/11 to 8/10? Why play games like this for no apparent reason and without my permission (or knowledge)?

See, this is why I hate contracts. When I prepaid my minutes with T-Mobile, they may have cost more, but–hey, wait a minute. I wonder if they really do since all those taxes and fees are folded into the prepaid minute charges. I can’t be sure, since my AT&T voice account was divided into day minutes and night/weekend minutes, but considering I spent about $30 a month on my Sidekick and about the same on my SLVR, I definitely think I came out ahead on that. Which means I’m probably paying more than I’d have to.

Sure, you could argue that AT&T should charge more since they’ve got 3G (which I turn off because it sucks battery and actually gives me crappier reception) and I use my data plan a LOT more than I did with the Sidekick. Then again, do you think they’re really charging us what they should? Do you think AT&T is charging us just enough to survive? Or do you think their goal is to get rich?

So, the same way that it’s their right to charge what they want as business people, it’s our right as consumers to pay as little as we can get away with. If AT&T were about innovation, their 3G network would be everywhere and Apple’s phone wouldn’t have so many glaring flaws.

To top it off, I only found out about this “bill” because I got an email from PageOnce.com–a service that keeps track of things like your cell phone bill and your bank accounts. So, AT&T’s default setting for people who opt into the “paperless billing” feature is “no email.” Isn’t that nice? My bill is due in three days.

Yes, I know that I’m an adult and I can tell how long 30 days is, but enough apologisting for the giant corporation! It takes NO effort whatsoever to program a script that will automatically email customers when their bill is ready.

So, there you have it.

Mobile phone carriers never fail to depress me. :) As soon as there’s a way to unlock the iPhone and as soon as I have that $175 early termination fee, I’m jumping ship on AT&T and returning to my contract-free ways. Hell, I might not even wait that long since GPS works without a carrier and open wifi networks aren’t that uncommon here in the big city.

Why must cell phone companies suck so much?

And don’t ask me “why are you so cheap?” or “why don’t you want to pay for anything?” because I’m being just as economical as corporations are.

I’ll probably end up back with T-Mo on one of their month-to-month plans. The 1g iPhone worked on their network. I’m sure eventually the 2g (3G) iPhone will, too.

The really sad thing is, I didn’t use anywhere near my total minutes! So not fair!

iTunes Overkill for Ringtone Syncing

by ThePete 12:35 pm 2008-08-05
utterz-image
Here’s a cap I took of my iTunes last night after clicking "Sync Ringtones."

That’s right–all existing songs, movies, and TV shows on my iPhone (I call her "Kurochan") will be wiped JUST so I can sync my ringtones!! What the hell is that?

Why must I wipe all of my media just for ringtone-syncage? It’s bad enough we have to pay to have ringtones added. It’s also bad enough we can’t just use songs in our music library for ringtones (not to mention not being able to use them for the alarm clock!) and now we have to go through the effort of dumping all of our media back on the iPhone?

I love it when a corporation tells me what to do.

It means I don’t have to think as much.

I just wish it didn’t hurt so much when I do it anyway. :(

Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterzreply-count Replies.

iPhone App Store Not as Vetted as Claimed

by ThePete 12:17 pm 2008-08-05

utterz-imageOne of the annoying things about the App Store, Apple’s method for delivering Apple-sanctioned applications to your iPhone, is the inconsistency. I’ve read that many developers are having a helluva time dealing with Apple. Some apps are rejected because of typos in the descriptions, while others are rejected out of hand with no explanation at all.

Then there are the apps that make it on to the App Store when they really shouldn’t. I have lost count of how many apps I’ve downloaded only to find that they refuse to open or work at all once they do open.

To be sure, most of the apps I’ve tried have worked fine. I just don’t understand how apps that so obviously suck don’t get filtered from the system while others get through–as in the case of the above screencapped app. It’s an app called "Codes Retard." At first, I thought it was some sort of reference app for programmers. You know like "Coding for Dummies" or something. Then I tried to find out what it was and… whoops!

I’m not sure how Apple can justify rejecting some Apps for typos when this thing made it into the US App Store with the entirely wrong language–AND with the claim that it’s in English.

I just hope Apple makes the NetShare app available again. I’m so annoyed I didn’t know there was an app that allowed you to tether your iPhone before it was yanked.

Tethering, FYI, is when you plug your laptop into your cell phone and allow your laptop to use the cell phone’s data connection to surf. Yeah, it’s obvious why Apple yanked NetShare, but leaving it up would make them look like they actually cared about what their customers wanted.
Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterzreply-count Replies.

Wal-Mart Hates America (but loves your money!)

by ThePete 11:18 am 2008-08-05
utterz-image
I grabbed this screencap a couple days ago from WSJ.com, though the article was originally posted on August 1, 2008 (here: http://online.wsj.com/…03381.html ). It’s all about how Wal-Mart is concerned about a Democratic win in November. They’re worried that laws might be passed that would make forming unions easier.

Has Obama even said anything about unions or Wal-Mart? I’m pretty sure he’ll be in the same boat as McCain and any other politician in the back pocket of TheBigBusiness. They’ll say unions are good, but won’t do anything to help them.

Personally, this isn’t even why I refuse to shop at Wal-Mart. I saw the documentary "Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Prices" where they make the claim that the family behind the mega-chain has their own nuclear fallout bunker.

To date I haven’t found anything that denies the existence of this bunker.

So, if the anti-union stance isn’t enough and the insanely low prices guaranteed by exploited workers in foreign countries don’t stop you from shopping at Wal-Mart, how about the thought that Wal-Mart will build a nuclear-proof bunker for themselves, but won’t mobilize their billions of dollars on protesting the existence of nuclear weapons?

They’ll take your money but when the shit comes down, they don’t give a crap about anyone but themselves (their low prices at the cost of exploited workers should prove this already to you).

Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterzreply-count Replies.

InfraGard: USGov Working With Businesses-Not You

by ThePete 12:42 am 2008-02-12

What do you get when the US government and private businesses work together?

Something fishy, in my mind.

Today on DemocracyNow.org’s podcast (www.democracynow.org/2008/2/11/report_fbi_deputizes_23_000_business ), I heard about a part of the federal government that is working with “business leaders” to help secure the infrastructure of America in case of a disaster or terrorist attack. At least that’s what a group with a name like “InfraGard” suggests.

Here’s a bit from InfraGard’s entry at Wikipedia.org (here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/InfraGuard ) that suggests something different: “InfraGard Alliances and the FBI said that they have developed a TRUST-based public-private sector partnership to ensure reliability and integrity of information exchanged about various terrorism, intelligence, criminal, and security matters.”

Sounds more like domestic spying to me. What would business owners have to do with “information exchanged about various terrorism, intelligence, criminal, and security matters”? As good citizens shouldn’t business leaders feel obligated to report anything suspicious they see going on?

Why do they need to be recruited, specifically? Do they get special training? Exactly what the heck is all this about?

In fact, if you have a look at the paragraph in the screencap of the InfraGard website above, you’ll see that they actually describe themselves *three* different ways. Check ‘em out:

1)InfraGard is an information sharing and analysis effort serving the interests and combining the knowledge base of a wide range of members.

OK, so, the FBI helps the members of InfraGard share and analyze information across all of it’s various members–but what kind of information could that even be?

2) At its most basic level, InfraGard is a partnership between the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the private sector.

Why would the private sector need to partner-up with the FBI? Would my friend who runs a boba drink shop benefit from InfraGard? This kind of vague language could mean anything.

3) InfraGard is an association of businesses, academic institutions, state and local law enforcement agencies, and other participants dedicated to sharing information and intelligence to prevent hostile acts against the United States.

Whoa.

So, this *is* domestic spying. It’s just that the government is having businesses do the actual big-brother routine. Isn’t it the job of the government to protect us from our enemies and not the Coca-Cola company?

Exactly where are our tax dollars going if the USGov needs this kind of “partnership” with some 23,000 business leaders? This is like Blackwater, only much more subtle–and therefore more scary since it’s practically invisible.

What’s worse is that apparently, some of InfraGard’s business leaders have been told that in a time of martial law *they* can use *lethal* force if they see the need. According to journalist Matt Rothschild who wrote a piece on InfraGard for The Progressive magazine (here: www.progressive.org/mag_rothschild0308 ) and gave an interview on today’s Democracy Now: “The business leaders themselves were told, at least in this one meeting, that if there is martial law declared or if there’s a time of an emergency, that members of InfraGard would have permission to protect—you know, whether it’s the local utility or, you know, their computers or the financial sector, whatever aspect. Whatever aspect of the infrastructure they’re involved with, they’d have permission to shoot to kill, to use lethal force to protect their aspect of the infrastructure, and they wouldn’t be able to be prosecuted, they were told.”

He also said: “These companies, these representatives of these companies feed the FBI information about threats. They also can give the FBI information about disgruntled employees and have the FBI investigate them. So the pipeline goes that way.”

So, if you’re not happy at your current work place, I’d be careful how you express it. With the power to call in the FBI, you can bet *some* businessman is going to abuse that power at some point.

Rothschild added: “And the pipeline goes the other way, too. The FBI gives these 23,000 businesspeople almost daily threat warnings that the public never gets. In at least one occasion, a government official, Governor Gray Davis of California, didn’t get, until he heard from his brother, who was in InfraGard, about threats to the bridges in California.”

So, now these businesses are more important than we individual citizens. The USG cares more about businesses than the citizens it is supposed to protect.

And don’t think InfraGard came into being just because of 911. According to their entry in Wikipedia, they were first formed in 1996 in Cleveland, Ohio, but expanded to other cities two years later–more than three years before 911.

So, this isn’t about protecting America from Al Qaeda. Al Qaeda didn’t exist in 1996. This is about being paranoid.

Am I against protecting infrastructure like electricity, water and communications? Of course not–but isn’t that the job of the police, the National Guard and other local authorities? Where is the check and/or balance here?

Also, why haven’t we heard of InfraGard in the last ten years it’s been around?

And why the hell did they spell “guard” wrong in their name?

What is our country coming to??

Wow–this was a long one

A Word (or Several) About Piracy

by ThePete 10:59 am 2008-02-11

This post was originally written as a comment to a post at Mashable.com by Stan Schroeder about how media companies need to do a better job at distribution than the pirates in order to beat them. Before I continue, I’d just like to point out that the word “pirate” is probably an unfair term to be used in describing those who share coyrighted files. Original pirates were killers and would steal ships and cargo–both physical items–and then kill the owners. All music and movie “pirates” do is effectively make photocopies. The owners are alive and have only lost a fraction of the imagined value of their property. And can you really blame these “pirates”?

In today’s economy where money seems to be worth less and less every day, gas seems to cost more and more every day, people are finding that they live in a world where more and more people can’t afford to pay for things like movie tickets and music.

Humans seem to need (or at least be addicted to) art (even bad art). So if they can’t afford to pay full price they make the smart business choice and go for the cheapest price they can find.

It’s OK for record executives to make the most money they can, but it’s not OK for the consumer to save as much money as they can. This seems unfair since record company executives are perceived to make more money than their acts and the CDs they put out mostly suck. Why are they getting rich off of generally sucking when they could and should just be scraping by?

The solution to me is obvious: the record companies need to make less money and offer more value.

If you want to continue charging $15 for a CD, then make it worth it. Make sure all the songs on it are good. Include cool premiums, like keychains, toys or other cool items. I disagree with the suggestion that record companies should add more digital content since it will be pirated along with the music. The extra stuff has to be only available by buying it in stores.

I do agree with many who say that evolution is the key here–like it or not, the consumeristic environment is changing. Evolve or die, sadly.

Complaining that consumers are “greedy” or “selfish” or “disrespectful to the property of others” won’t change the fact that consumers are reacting to their own environments and adapting. They don’t want to go without so they’re evolving, too.

I’m sure everyone wants their favorite bands to survive and feed their families. But don’t blame “pirates” for not wanting to pay what, to many, are absurd prices for generally lackluster product. Wasn’t it Radiohead, just last year, who made more money letting consumers pay what they wanted than they would have if they’d released their CD in stores?

Stop defending the old ways and let’s all evolve together.

TheBlurb: "How can one talk about life without saying sometime it's going to end? It makes the value of life all the more precious."
updated on 11/01/08 14:45:18 Change it! Archives