Skip to content
thepete.com » - » HULK (2003) thepete.com

TheAdvertising:
:gnisitrevdAehT

HULK (2003)


by ThePete 3:28 am 2003-06-20
Categories On Home Video, PocketReviews.Net | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Hulk (Widescreen Special Edition)Entertaining? Moderately – but it’s not SPIDER-MAN or X-MEN…
Technically any good? The story lumbers along more slowly than the title character. CLUNKY story elements – characters doing stuff that doesn’t make much sense (like Betty recognizing Bruce as the Hulk) and a back story that has no purpose but to set up the weak-ass badguy and the weak-ass climax.
How did I feel as the credits rolled? Disappointed – Ang Lee makes a bad film every once in a while and this movie means his next one will kick butt! I’m a fan of the comic, but like DAREDEVIL this one just doesn’t stand up on it’s own.
Final Rating? SAM (for the FX – cuz that’s all this film’s got going for it…)

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark
by ThePete 3:28 am 2003-06-20 Categories On Home Video, PocketReviews.Net | $ | Comments (0) »

Like this post? Help provide the fuel ThePete needs to write more of 'em: Caffeine! Click the coffee to Paypal him $3 for his next cup o' joe!

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*
*
By commenting, you agree to TheComments policy available for your perusal over on TheWikiPeteia.
CommentLuv Enabled
« Back to text comment
TheBlurb: Ignorance must really be bliss, or else why would so many people embrace it?
updated on 12/05/09 13:44:16 Change it! Archives