Skip to content
thepete.com - » TheWars thepete.com

TheAdvertising:
:gnisitrevdAehT

Wikileaks Cracks Pentagon Encryption; My Faith in Our Leaders is Restored (or NOT)


by ThePete 1:59 pm 2009-02-27
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

This is hilarious–well, assuming you think massive incompetence being a Pentagon job requirement is funny. Can you believe this? Apparently there was a password on the politically sensitive file at this URL:

http://oneteam.centcom.mil/isc/Shared%20Documents/NATO%20Master%20Narrative.doc

By the look of it, the only thing protecting the contents of this file is the fact that it’s a password-protected MS Word doc. Wtf?? What bright-eyes thought this would be a good idea? Let’s just leave a politically sensitive WORD DOC in an unprotected directory and expect a fracking MS Word password to keep it safe. WHAT COULD HAPPEN?

So, anyway, the post at Wikileaks.org (see screencap above or original here: https://secure.wikileaks.org/wiki/N1 ) doesn’t explain how the “encryption” was “cracked” but I suspect it was something simple, like the highly technical process of entering random words until something worked.

You may be wondering what was so politically sensitive in the Word doc. Well, it turns out it was a document meant for NATO officials, and it tells them not to tell anyone that the country of Jordan is involved in helping us with the War Against Terror (aka tWAT) in Afghanistan. What’s the catch with the world knowing Jordan is involved? It’s supposed to be a secret. Apparently, back in 2001 they officially withdrew from the ISAF (International Security Assistance Force), which is officially in charge of our efforts in Afghanistan. It seems like they sure didn’t stop helping us.

Why is it a big deal that Jordan is still involved in our Afghani efforts? Well, it seems they’re real big in the torture community. They are also said to be big helpers with our extraordinary renditions program. So, essentially, they help us when we go into one country, kidnap a suspect and deliver said suspect to another country where we ask them questions and let local authorities torture if we don’t like the answers.

In an obviously related story the Pentagon shut their entire site down this afternoon. Gee, I wonder why they did that!

Does anyone still wonder why the world has so much wrong with it when our leaders are smegging moronic enough to use only a single password to protect sensitive information?

OH yeah and the password on the doc? Progress.

Well done, Pentagon! Well done!!

Massive kudos to Twitter-user Zaibatsu who posted about Wikileaks cracking the password on the NATO file.

I wonder if this story will hit CNN or any of the other MSM news “sources.”

Posted via email from thepete’s posterous

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

OK, For the LAST TIME, Israel Needs to CHILL.


by ThePete 1:14 am 2009-01-06
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr
Discover Simple, Private Sharing at Drop.io

Read the latest as of this blog post at CNN.com here.

So, here’s the deal.

I’ve been writing about this shit going on in Israelistine, or Palestisrael (which ever you prefer), for many, many years. So, let me break it down to the simplest terms I can think of:

Israel can bring peace if they want to.

That’s it. Now, please, consider the following:

1) Is Hamas, or anyone in the occupied territories a real threat to Israel? Or are they just a bunch of pissed off people with crappy, unreliable weapons.

No and yes.

2) Did Hamas even exist before Israel occupied the occupied territories?

No.

So, doesn’t that mean Israel is the root cause of this strife?

Let’s keep going:

3) No one ever asks the question: What does Israel want by occupying these chunks of land?

Jerusalem? They have it. Now what are they doing with all of those Palestinians?

3) Does anyone really think pounding a house, a mosque, or even a neighborhood with weapons like the kinds Israel can afford will do anything but make people hate them more?

Terrorism is the result (generally) of a person or people feeling they have no other options–they have no voice, no control and think hurting people or destroying things is the only thing they can do. Keep reacting that way and you’ll never stamp out terrorists–but you will create dozens more.

In fact, some might see the Israeli government’s actions as part of a terrorist-making machine. In fact, if I were a corrupt leader who was more interested in keeping my citizens rallied behind me and less with their well-being, I’d say “kudos” to the Israeli government for doing what the Nazis did by giving the citizenry a unified enemy to always be afraid of. Well done!

So, in the end, who has the real power to create peace here?

The Palestinian terrorists who keep shooting their useless little rockets into Israel killing almost no one? Or the big guys with the undisclosed nuke program?

Israel can take her lumps–that’s all they’ll ever be. Hamas and anyone else in the occupied territories have limited resources. They’ll never be a formidable foe or threat to Israel. So, the violence stops when the government of Israel stops acting like an abusive parent and starts acting like a civilized governing body. They need to treat the handful of terrorists in the territories as criminals because that’s what they are.

When hundreds are killed in the name of stopping a handful, you have to wonder: who is worse?

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Why Bush Should Have Let the Shoe Hit Him


by ThePete 3:15 pm 2008-12-16
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr
Discover Simple, Private Sharing at Drop.io

Why did he duck? The shoes weren’t even loaded!

As Muntadhar al-Zaidi becomes a hero across Iraq for throwing his Iraqi-made shoes at George W. Bush during a recent surprise(d) visit to Iraq, I couldn’t help but think about how fast good old King George was to duck those shoes. Just last night, Steve Isaacs microblogged that he felt Bush dodging those shoes made the current occupant of the White House look competent and capable. That got me thinking.

In the movie Cool Hand Luke (spoiler alert) there’s a great scene where Paul Newman’s character proves his grit by standing up to the prison bully. He doesn’t win the fight–he doesn’t even get a few good punches in. In fact, he gets his ass pounded. The thing is, he keeps getting back up to get pounded again.

This is heroism, folks. This is taking responsibility for your actions. Newman’s “Luke” wanted to take on the big man and put him in his place, but he couldn’t do it with strength. So, he did it with honor.

So, it’s natural that, like a weasel, Bush ducks the shoes as they fly at his face. That’s what he’s been best at all this time, right? Ducking responsibility for one colossal fuck-up after another.

911 wasn’t his fault–it was the terrorists who hate our freedom. Forget that memo with the title “bin Laden determined to strike inside the United States.” Forget that it’s the government’s job to stop things like the 911 attacks from happening. Forget that there used to be FAA regulations that allowed for USAF fighters to shoot down any aircraft heading toward populated areas. What happened to that regulation, anyway? I remember what happened to Payne Stewart.

Katrina wasn’t his fault–how could they predict a storm like that and an aftermath like that? Well, National Geographic Magazine did.

Saddam not having WMD wasn’t Bush’s fault, either. How could they know that Saddam had no WMD? I mean, besides the fact that there was no hard evidence he had WMD?

Iraq being the absurd quagmire that it has become–certainly, there was no way to predict that! Of course, the British experienced it first hand… in 1917. I won’t bring up Dick Cheney’s own prediction of a mess back in 1992.

So, consider how just one of those shoes hitting Bush in the face would have made you feel. I know I’d have still laughed and played the clip over and over and over.

But him ducking the shoes?

Nothing new there. Just same old not-so-artful dodging from a man who didn’t even have the decency to make sure he was properly elected… either time.

It just shows you the kind of spineless, fearful little weasel George W. Bush is.

It’s a shoe, man. What’s it going to do to you? Knock out a tooth? Break the skin?

Bush, you’re supposed to be the president of the United States of America and you’re afraid of a couple shoes.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Other Shoe Falls on Bush During Visit to Iraq–and It’s from an Iraqi Foot


by ThePete 3:52 pm 2008-12-14
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr


Wow, I hope the guy that threw those shoes at Bush doesn’t end up in Abu Ghraib or Gitmo. Pull that kind of thing here in the land of the Free and the Brave and you get your ass investigated and possibly even arrested for threatening the life of the guy in the White House. Hell, in this country just talking about throwing a shoe at the occupier of the Oval Office might bring the Secret Service’s shoe down on your throat.

Hey, you didn’t really think we have 100% free speech didja?

After all, Bush himself agrees that there should be limits to freedom (and he said that before 911!).

Read more about King George’s encounter with the shoe-throwing Angry Iraqi at CNN.com.

Posted via email from thepete’s posterous

CORRECTION: I just watched the video–turns out the Iraqi dude threw both of his shoes at Bush. So, I corrected the text above to reflect multiple shoes thrown. :)

UPDATE: Here’s video of the actual event as it happened:

Discover Simple, Private Sharing at Drop.io

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Chances of a WMD Attack in a big city better than 50%??


by ThePete 2:45 am 2008-12-02
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Grabbed this on my iPhone just now and I have to admit that I don’t trust this task force. These guys MUST be lying or hopelessly paranoid. There is no way you could say there’s a better than 50/50 chance that a city will get hit by WMD.
 
Of course, bio or chem weapons I could see as being more likely, but still not a 50% chance, but nukes (which are what we all think of first when we hear the letters “WMD”)?? No way, man, and reporting this story this way is nothing short of alarmist and fear mongering.
 
Reuters is really doing us a disservice by not making it immediately clear that nukes are much less likely than chem or bio. And even knowing that, when I saw that headline and read that first paragraph, I thought they meant their was a better than even chance that nukes would definitely hit a big city–then reality set in and I remembered how the odds of any random big city being hit are dramatically against.
 
Thanks, Reuters, for making us crap our pants…again!
 
Oh and newsflash: government task forces have been getting it wrong for the last 8 years–probably longer–all the press ever does is highlight the fear and bury the logic. Way to unquestioningly quote the party line and question little-to-nothing.

Posted by email from thepete’s posterous

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

TORTURING DEMOCRACY a New Documentary


by ThePete 3:49 pm 2008-10-17
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr
I’m a big fan of taking the good with the bad. If it’s true, even if it’s bad, I want to hear about it and I want to deal with it, the sooner, the better. Sadly (to me), not everyone shares this view. Many people want to deny and ignore as much as they can when they don’t like it. When the Abu Ghraib story broke a few years ago, I really didn’t want to see those photos. I really didn’t want to believe that my government would torture.

I had heard that government officials would take suspects and have them "interrogated" in countries where torture was legal. This disturbed me enough. When the waterboarding stuff broke, I wasn’t shocked, but I was disappointed. Then, when Bush insisted that "we don’t torture" I knew it was just Orwellian doublespeak and that we do torture.

"Torturing Democracy" is all about America committing acts of torture. According to the official website (http://torturingdemocracy.org/ ) the documentary: "…relies on the documentary record to connect the dots in an investigation of harsh interrogations of prisoners in U.S. custody – and points straight to the top. Timely and powerful, at its heart the film is about the rule of law – and how the government pushed it aside despite the fierce resistance of many on the inside."

Attached to this post is one of the excerpts available on the official site and it features Richard Armitage, Deputy Sec of State under Colin Powell, talking about how he was waterboarded (as part of training) and how he definitely considers waterboarding a form of torture. He also mentions that he’s ashamed that the discussion about whether waterboarding is torture or not is even being considered.

If you’re in the Washington DC area, watch this docu on WETA at 10pm tonight (10/17/8). Check out a complete listing of channels and times here: http://is.gd/4gLf

OR just go to http://TorturingDemocracy.org/ to watch the entire movie right now.

I have yet to watch it, but plan on doing so this weekend. I’ll post a review next week.

Be responsible for what your government does–watch this movie and be offended as you should be. Then, vote accordingly.

Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterlireply-count Replies.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

George W. Bush Solves Economic Crisis by Snapping Fingers!


by ThePete 4:00 am 2008-09-25
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr
utterli-image
This is a totally useless observation, but I noticed
tonight while looking at the pic of Bush delivering
his historic "we’re screwed" speech to
the nation a little black spot under his jaw. Can
you see it? WTH is that?
Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterli.
 reply-count Replies.

Ugh, so here is a fun one–George W. Bush trying to convince us all that he’s right about something else that has gone to shit under his watch.

Seriously, everything this man touches turns to fine smelling feces. I challenge anyone to name something he’s gotten right. I mean, do we really need me to go through this transcript to know that Bush will distort the facts, deceive us and dodge responsibility? Well, I’m a glutton for punishment (it comes from watching every episode of MST3K several times over), so here we go!

The below transcript of Bush’s historic “We’re Screwed” speech comes from JPGardners’ Donkelphant.com and remember, Bush’s comments will be in italics while mine will be factually accurate and not in italics.

THE PRESIDENT: Good evening.

Oh, Al Gore was there? :P (Get it? It says “THE PRESIDENT”. YES I’m still bitter god damn it!!)

This is an extraordinary period for America’s economy.

THIS GUY IS SHARP, BOY! What’s next? An observation that touching open flames cause pain??

Over the past few weeks, many Americans have felt anxiety about their finances and their future.

“Few weeks”?!?!?!

Try “few years” idiot. I’ve been blogging about the value of the dollar dropping for three years, possibly more.

It’s really hard not to use the word “retard” in connection with this fool, but I don’t want to insult anyone who is actually mentally handicapped.

I understand their worry and their frustration.

Ah, so you’re not frustrated? Why should you be? You’re wearing a beautiful new golden suit spun with gold so fine that you can’t see it, you tremendous feeb.

Sorry, I know it’s not mature to call people names, but this fucker won’t go away! He’s committed crimes, failed to protect Americans from terrorists and killer storms, bungled two wars almost simultaneously and now he’s managed to oversee one of the biggest economic failures America has seen since the Great Depression.

Ah, good stuff! o_O
More…

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Can We Call It WW III NOW???


by ThePete 3:55 pm 2008-08-11
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr
utterz-image
I’m not sure how many major-theater/major-world-power wars need to be going on at once before we’ll actually call this what it is: a world war.

I know it’s a big scary thing to call it a "world war" but I feel that we need to take responsibilty for all of this death and destruction before every continent is engulfed in combat.

Merriam-Webster.com defines a "world war" as: "a war engaged in by all or most of the principal nations of the world,"

That’s pretty much what we’ve got going on here. So why not just call a spade a spade?

OH YEAH. Because then we’d have to take responsibilty for it.

Yick! Responsibility!

Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterzreply-count Replies.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Didn’t They Already Have a Say?


by ThePete 8:53 pm 2008-07-10
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr
utterz-image
Grabbed this screencap from Google News in the early hours of 7/9 and just had to shake my head.

I mean, REALLY.

A bipartisan panel wants the government to play a bigger role when a president decides to go to war.

Uhhhhh, YEAH.

You know what, Mr. or Mrs. Bipartisan Panel?

THEY ALREADY HAVE A BIGGER ROLE.

They just turned over that role to Bush in the lead-up to the Iraq Attack–or did you guys not study very hard in school?

I mean, any kid who paid attention in history class (or for me, Social Studies class) knows that it’s Congress’ job to authorize military force. Before we invaded a sovereign member of the UN (Iraq) back in 2003, the US Congress told Bush that he could swing his ability to declare war around like a huge penis in order to scare Saddam into fessing up about his WMD.

Of course, no amount of penis-swinging would get Saddam to admit something that wasn’t true, so Bush got to use his war powers. Of course, if Congress hadn’t been lied to by the White House, they’d have known Saddam had nothing to declare as we threatened to cross his border.

They trusted the guy in the White House. It’s my impression that the Founding Fathers didn’t want the guy in the White House to have the power to invade a country–so why did Congress defy that interest of the FF? Especially to a man like Bush who was such a great leader he let 911 happen, invaded a whole country and then couldn’t even capture the guy who was behind 911.

This was a guy who didn’t even have the decency to make sure he won the 2000 election.

Hey, did you know that when there’s a tie in a presidential race the US Constitution states that it’s *Congress* that votes on who the president should be?

Yeah, apparently the Supreme Court hadn’t heard that either. By I digress!

The USC(ongress) should never have given Bush the ability to shoot his military load into Iraq to begin with, so essentially, since Bush "took office" the Supreme Court, Congress and the White House all let us down. That’s all three branches, isn’t it?

Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterzreply-count Replies.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

The Real Reason the US Will Invade Iran


by ThePete 11:38 pm 2008-04-10
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

I’ve blogged a bunch about the petrodollar–don’t know what that is? In a nutshell, it’s kind of a nickname for dollars used to buy oil from OPEC countries. A lot of folks don’t know that the only way to get oil from OPEC member nations is by using USD. What happens if you don’t have USD? You have to buy it. Read more about petrodollars here: http://en.wikipedia.org/…etrodollar

What does this have to do with Iran? Well, for a couple years now (see my first post on it here: http://thepete.com/…vade-iran/ ) Iran has been trying to get it’s own oil bourse going. What’s a bourse? Just a fancy-shmancy word for a commodities exchange. In this case, the commodity would be oil. Well, Iran has had a bit of trouble getting their bourse off the ground but they finally pulled it off on February 17, 2008–yep, just a couple of months back. Guess what currency they’re selling oil with.

It ain’t dollars.

And now, according to the above-screencapped April 6, 2008 article from AP.org (available here: http://biz.yahoo.com/…_opec.html ), Iran wants other OPEC nations to bail on the dollar, too. From the article:

"According to the Iranian government’s Web site, Ahmadinejad told OPEC Secretary General Abdalla Salem el-Badri the cartel "should establish a joint bank as well as having joint currency.""

Sure, other OPEC nations don’t support the change, but Iran isn’t the first nation to stop trading oil with dollars–Venezuela doesn’t.

Why am I so sure that Iran will be invaded because they don’t want to sell oil with USD? Well, remember Saddam? He swapped out the dollar for the euro.

Yeeeah.

Middle East oil, not traded with the USD?

Good luck with that Iran.

Read more about that bourse here: http://en.wikipedia.org/…Oil_Bourse
Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterz Replies.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

StopMilitaryRape.org


by ThePete 1:53 am 2008-04-07
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

I have mixed feelings about the military. While I never served, I did come close and I have family that has and does serve currently. I have great respect for men and women that feel strongly about doing what they call "fighting for their country." That said, the military is still filled with people. Regular folks, just like you and me. They do good jobs and bad, make mistakes and make things right. They both mean well and don’t–the military is a microcosm of civilization. In that sense, it should be no surprise that there is crime. One of those crimes is rape.

Sadly, women have been pretty much second class citizens until just the past couple of decades and even now, it’s more like the 1800s for them–sometimes they get hazed (of course, so do men) and sometimes, they get raped (almost as frighteningly, so do men). And like the civilian world, in the military, rape often goes unreported–of course, as I said, it’s more like the 1800s for rape victims.

It’s MUCH harder to report a rape if you actually like the military. Just Google "Suzanne Swift" if you don’t believe me. She reported being raped by a superior and eventually ended up with him in charge of her. Check out SuzanneSwift.org to read her story.

You can also check out the DemocracyNow.org story that first informed me of the website http://StopMilitaryRape.org/ by going here: http://www.democracynow.org/…n_soldiers

That DN article talks about a conference that took place on International Women’s Day, back in March of this year, that featured military women talking about rape and sexual abuse they’ve experienced or witnessed. Listening to their stories in the audio version of the article was pretty much gut-wrenching (here’s the MP3 of the episode if you’ve got a strong stomach: http://www.archive.org/…1_64kb.mp3 ).

So, if you know anyone who is dealing with rape, please help them get help. If you know anyone who is in the military dealing with rape, point them to http://stopmilitaryrape.org/

Rape, in the military or out, isn’t about sex, or even lust. It’s about power and control. The people who commit such acts should not get away with it and the people who fall victim need all the help they can get to move on with their lives.
Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterz Replies.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Daily Show: Republican Admits They Effed Up


by ThePete 4:22 am 2008-04-03
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

This isn’t some play on words or a clip of Bush "accidentally" saying the opposite of what the speech writer told him to say–on the episode of "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart" from March 31, 2008, Republican Senator from Nebraska, Chuck Hagel, actually admitted that Congress made a mistake in allowing Bush to decide to go to war. What Hagel said in this interview is incredibly important:

"We did not do our job. We failed the American People in that we didn’t ask the toughest questions."

What saddens me is that Hagel is the second person in government, during the Bush administration, who has admitted that Congress did let the American people down. The first was Richard Clark, the terrorism czar that George W. inherited from Bill Clinton. I can’t even remember when Clarke admitted that the government had let the American People down, but he did. In his case it was in regards to the USG allowing 911 to happen.

Now, Hagel is saying it, too only this time it’s about something even less forgivable than not being on the ball enough to stop terrorists from doing something insane. Of course, it’s easy for Hagel to say he and others in Congress let us down–he’s got a book to sell (much like Clarke did) and Hagel’s not running for president (it’s always easier to tell the truth when you aren’t worried about your job). He also jokes in the interview with Stewart that he’s not likely to have a job in Washington after this November. I hope this is true for many more people in Congress aside from him.

And don’t think that Hagel is some saint just because he actually has the balls to say it like it is–the dude is rumored to be just as corrupt as everyone else. I recall reading somewhere that he was elected on ballot machines made by a company he owns.

Maybe we should consider his criticisms of the war to be just sour grapes reflecting his frustration that he invested in a balloting machine company instead of Halliburton or Bechtel.

Oh well, at least he said it!
Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterz Replies.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

So, Is This World War III, Yet?


by ThePete 1:41 pm 2008-02-26
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

I definitely feel like we’re all suffering from that curse–you know the one I mean. The one that says "may you live in interesting times."

I feel like we’re living in an important part of history. Bigger than Vietnam, bigger than Korea and approaching the level of importance of WWII. In fact, I’d almost say it’s identical to the time before WWII.

Labor is cheap and our economy is weak (though I suppose it was back on track after the depression in the immediate years before WWII) and we’re looking at war in "multiple theaters." "Multiple theater war" is just a Web 2.0-style phrase that describes a World War.

America, the Earth’s last super-power has combat operations in Afhganistan and Iraq. We seem to have our sights set on Iran. Turkey has invaded northern Iraq as you can see from the above screencap from Google News (get updates here: http://news.google.com/ ). There are all sorts of military messes in Africa, Pakistan is unstable (to say the least), Kosovo has declared its independence and Israel and Palestine, well, let’s just say they’re still not getting along.

So, with all of these skirmishes, is it time we start calling this World War III?

I feel that if we start calling it what it is, we’ll take it that much more seriously and work to end it. Since we’re still thinking of it as "The War Against Terror" it seems a bit too close to "The War on Drugs." I don’t think any of us took T.W.O.D. too seriously. Likewise, T.W.A.T. doesn’t seem that much more like a "real" world than T.W.O.D. did. As a result, we’re all very disconnected from the atrocities being committed in our name.

I feel like we Americans are not very good at facing the depressing realities of our world. And I say "we" as in me, too. Calling this a World at War just might hammer home the seriousness of what’s going on.

Then again, American Idol might be on.

Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterz Replies.  mp3

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

The 5 Minute Show Episode 20030223 Anti-War Protest pt 2!


by ThePete 3:16 pm 2008-02-22
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

And here are the continuing adventures of ThePete at an Anti-Iraq War protest shortly before we went to war in Iraq. :(

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

GITMO TRIALS RIGGED TO END IN CONVICTION?


by ThePete 2:15 pm 2008-02-21
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Here’s another gem from http://DemocracyNow.org/. On yesterday’s show, they reported on the former chief prosecutor for Guantanamo’s military commissions who told the Nation magazine that there was no way any of those six guys accused of taking part in the 911 attacks would get a fair trial. Here’s a bit from the show’s transcript (get the whole thing here: http://www.democracynow.org/…guantanamo ): "The 9/11 trials for the six Guantanamo prisoners charged by the Pentagon last week with conspiracy to commit war crimes might have been rigged from the start to rule out the possibility of any acquittals, this according to the latest statements to The Nation magazine from Colonel Morris Davis, the former chief prosecutor for Guantanamo’s military commissions.

Colonel Davis recounted a 2005 meeting with the Bush administration-appointed Pentagon General Counsel William Haynes, who now oversees the prosecutions and the defense for the tribunal process. Haynes said, “We can’t have acquittals. If we’ve been holding these guys for so long, how can we explain letting them get off? We can’t have acquittals, we’ve got to have convictions”

Colonel Davis resigned from the military commissions in October 2007, saying the system had become ‘politicized’ and he could no longer be effective. His latest statements to The Nation magazine offer the most pointed evidence of the military commission’s bias and undermine the Bush administration’s claims of ensuring fair trials for the accused."

Weeee! This is the biggest thorn in my side regarding all of this "Post-911 Thinking" going on. In one of our country’s founding documents we make the statement that all humans are equal, right? I’m paraphrasing, but that’s what is accepted, right?

Well, the exact phrasing is: "all men are created equal."

Please note: it doesn’t say that all "Americans" are created equal.

Therefore, EVERY human on the planet deserves the same rights as any American citizen.

So, even if these six guys in Gitmo are guilty of what they are accused of, they STILL deserve a fair trial! I don’t care if they’re criminals, war criminals or "enemy combatants" (whatever the hell those are). They should still get fair trials and the same rights any other human gets.

If we don’t provide what we promise how can anyone outside of the US trust what any of us say?

Now, to me, this doesn’t sound like the trials are rigged. However, if the guys in charge of the trials say something like "there can be no acquittals" you have to admit, that screams "unfair bias" all over the damn place.

Just a sidenote here: there have been no convictions for the 911 attacks. There have been just a handful of convictions of terror suspects involved in other attacks not on US soil. We’ve invaded two countries and ended hundreds of thousands of lives in the interest of catching terrorists, yet we can’t seem to convict hardly anyone in a court of law.

How much you wanna bet those six dudes in Guantanamo have exactly nada to do with 911?
Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterz Replies.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Oklahoma 911/The War On Terror License Plate


by ThePete 1:53 pm 2008-02-04
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

I can’t believe I, of all people, missed this story last August, but I did. I stumbled across a post about it a week, or so, ago (here: http://enews.org/…ights.html ) and I felt like I had to make a bigger deal out of it. Have a look at that ugly, horrible sample plate. If you own a car in the fine state of Oklahoma, you can decorate your car with this thing for just $37 (http://www.tax.ok.gov/…45.html)...

…If you want to.

WHY you’d want to is beyond me. The post I linked to above, written by a guy calling himself "Espresso Sucking Pavement Dweller" or ESPD for short, is all about the lousy design of the plate. ESPD is right–the black on red banner is hardly readable (it looks like it says "944" to me) and the clipart used for the Towers look like completely different buildings. He makes a few other points, including one about how others will criticize this license plate for reasons other than design.

Let me be one of those people. Let’s begin:

1) Since when do you have license plates memorializing terrorist acts? Isn’t it a little ghoulish to use the deaths of those 3000 people on 9/11/1 as advertising for a war?

2) I’m of the belief that America is stronger than a few thousand Muslim extremists. We can handle anything they can throw at us and the idea that we need to fight "The Global War On Terrorism" seems like over-dramatizing the threat of Al Qaeda and terrorism, in general. If you look at the statistics, cars, cancer and AIDS each kill more people every year than terrorism (more: http://thepete.com/…0-points/).

3) Oklahoma is fighting the war on terror? How’s that, exactly? What does Oklahoma have that Al Qaeda wants?

4) As I mentioned in point 1, this plate is just an advertisement for a war–for killing people. Has "The Global War on Terrorism" brought us Bin Laden or even a single conviction on actual terrorism-related charges? So far it seems like this whole thing hasn’t meant–well, I could be off color, here, I’ll just suggest you refer to the acronym for "The Global War On Terror" only remove the "Global."

As Super Duper Tuesday is tomorrow and the next presidential election is in seven months, don’t let 911 and mentions of the wars, Al Qaeda and other fear-mongering scare you into voting for one person or another. Vote with your head–not your fear.

Do I think we should go after Al Qaeda? Definitely. They do want to kill some of us. However, a war on a few thousand people with no country, no army, no nukes, and no obvious hierarchy seems like blatant, soulless, overkill. Plus, it’s just what they want us to do.

Who knows? Maybe Bin Laden will see this license plate and give up. But I’m thinking it’ll just make us snobby cityfolk point and snicker.
Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterz Replies.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Death Photo of Ernie Pyle: WW2 Embedded Reporter


by ThePete 1:41 pm 2008-02-03
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Source: http://www.breitbart.com/…rticle.php

Sorry if anyone is offended by the above photo–I think as pictures of dead people go, this one’s pretty tame. Plus many view him as an American hero, so I think it’s important that we all see this picture.

See, I always thought that embedded reporting started with Iraq in 2003–but apparently, it goes way back, but wasn’t called the same thing. Ernie Pyle was probably the most famous American embedded reporter of World War II. He was shot in the temple by Japanese soldiers and died immediately. It was 1945 and he was 44.

His intensely personal columns covering the frontlines of the war won a Pulitzer and the hearts of America. When he was killed, it made the headlines. Late last year I was visiting a friend of mine up in Burbank –we wandered into a used bookshop where they had an original newspaper reporting the death of Ernie Pyle.

Sadly, that was the first time I’d heard of the man. It sounds like he was an amazing individual. Sadly, the above picture has barely ever been seen and no negatives are known to exist, so I’m trying to put it in front of as many people as possible.

I feel like most Americans don’t understand how important and how dangerous it is to be a reporter. Well, a *real* reporter. Not someone like Anderson Cooper or one of the idiots on Fox News, who have make-up and hair people standing by. Pyle was the real thing.
Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterz Replies.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

WOMAN CLAIMS GANG RAPE BY HALLIBURTON SUBSIDIARY KBR


by ThePete 6:00 am 2007-12-12
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

God damn, what the hell is wrong with people today? If this woman is telling the truth (I have no idea why anyone would lie about being gang raped), there are some seriously effing dark tendencies hiding in people just waiting for the moral permission to jump out and make us regret human “civilization” getting this far. I’m getting ahead of myself. Check out this cutting from a December 10, 2007 article at ABCNews.com about Jamie Leigh Jones claiming to be gang raped by KBR employees while working for them in Iraq:

A Houston, Texas woman says she was gang-raped by Halliburton/KBR coworkers in Baghdad, and the company and the U.S. government are covering up the incident.

Jamie Leigh Jones, now 22, says that after she was raped by multiple men at a KBR camp in the Green Zone, the company put her under guard in a shipping container with a bed and warned her that if she left Iraq for medical treatment, she’d be out of a job.

“Don’t plan on working back in Iraq. There won’t be a position here, and there won’t be a position in Houston,” Jones says she was told.

Wow–I’d pretty much not be giving a shit about keeping my job if that had happened to me.

“Hmmm, continue working for the people who gang raped me or get mental help?” That would not be a question I’d be asking myself.

Regardless, this is a pretty sad state of affairs. Sure, if true, the gang rape was committed by the traditional (read: cliche) “few bad apples” but we really need to start asking the question what the hell is it about Iraq that is turning people into monsters?

Whether it’s the Haditha massacre of 24 civilians, the rape and murder of a 14 year-old girl and the murder of her family, or this new story, something about the culture of America Vs. Iraq has had seriously corrupting effects on people who are supposed to be “the heroes” (read:USGIs).

Sure, war makes savages of us all, but if it’s that simple–then why the fuck do we keep waging it??

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

US SAYS IRAN’S REVOLUTIONARY GUARD ARE TERRORISTS, but…


by ThePete 6:00 am 2007-12-07
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

source: the CIA Factbook

Let me start out with a cutting from a November 15, 2007 WSJ.com article that talks about Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC):

Most Americans already know more about the IRGC than they’d like to. In September the Senate voted overwhelmingly in favor of a nonbinding resolution urging President Bush to label the IRGC a terrorist group. He did so a month later and has since implemented harsh new sanctions targeting the business interests of the IRGC. As Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson told the press recently, “It is increasingly likely that if you are doing business with Iran you are doing business with the IRGC.”

This all just cracks me up because it’s a wonderful example of how full of shit the USGovernment really is, here. Because a fraction of the terrorism going on in Afghanistan and Iraq seem to be caused with the help of the IRGC, we label them terrorists and start making it hard for them to do business.

What if the favor were returned?

What if the Republican party were labeled a terrorist organization?

“Oh, yeah, the Republicans were behind the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. Neither country did anything directly aggressive yet, the Republican in charge of the US military ordered invasions! We’re banning all business with America because if you’re doing business with America, you’re probably doing business with a Republican.”

Yeah, not so cool when you look at it from the other side, is it?

Of course, the reverse scenario will never happen because America is too powerful.

What happens to the most powerful country on the planet when it is left unchecked and begins to abuse the massive power it holds?

Nothing.

It just gets more and more abusive. Why should it stop?

No, seriously, why should it stop?

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

TYPICAL BUSH: Iran Still a Threat Even Without Nukes


by ThePete 9:00 am 2007-12-05
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Uuuugh, this is getting OLD, man. Check out what I saw on my Twitterstream yesterday morning:

Isn’t that nice? What’s worse is what the BBC News reported in their article from December 4, 2007 about Bush’s paranoia about Iran, or as I like to call it, pIRANoia:

Iran remains a threat to the world despite new intelligence saying the country may not be building nuclear weapons, the US president says.

Mr Bush said the report released on Monday was a “warning signal” and his view that a nuclear Iran would be a danger “hasn’t changed”.

The president stressed that Iran was still trying to enrich uranium and could restart its weapons programme.

Tehran has denied continued accusations that it is developing nuclear weapons.

Haven’t we heard all this before??? There’s a great scene in an episode of the edgy Cartoon Network show, Boondocks, featuring white street-thugs who hold up a 7-11-style store and demand the Saddam look-alike behind the counter drop his gun, even though the Saddam look-alike isn’t holding one. I hope the show’s creator, Aaron McGruder, is ready to make this same joke again because it still looks like Bush is going to drag us into Iran.

Personally, I’m getting to the point where I wish it would just happen. It can get a lot worse than it is now and so many Americans are still just going about their business as though we’re not in the middle of a World War. Us and Iraq, Us and Afghanistan, Turkey and the Kurds, the mess in Myanmar (Burma), how many more theaters of war do we need before we start to accept that WWIII is here? Or WWIV or whatever number we’re up to.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

TheBlurb: Why can't everyone support Iranians and their quest for liberty?
updated on 06/30/09 22:57:59 Change it! Archives