Skip to content
thepete.com - » TheCultureJam thepete.com

TheAdvertising:
:gnisitrevdAehT

The Story of @Megapixel or How Social Media Allows Us to Remember Those We Never Knew


by ThePete 9:00 pm 2009-07-01
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

The content of this post was first published on my TwitWall but under a different title.

So, I was just minding my own business today when I saw a Tweet from @bsimi">@bsimi explaining that today at the @RSHotel dirty martinis would cost $7 in memory of Megapixel. I didn’t know her, and my instinct is to double check before I assume things I read online reflect reality.  Some people have dry, even invisible, senses of humor, so it pays to confirm stuff.  Sadly, it’s true–Meg Porter, aka Megapixel on Twitter, died in a car accident a week ago yesterday.  Seems she may have been on a single-lane road when a big-rig was going the other way.  Regardless, it was sad–she was just 24 years-old. 

What makes her death even more poignant is that while she had over 3000 followers on Twitter, she let everyone follow her life via her vlog posts on MegPorter.com.  I haven’t had a chance to look at many of them, but in the few I watched she seemed like a pretty normal 24 year-old woman–her whole life ahead of her.  Life is funny this way–some of us go away early, some of us stick around, while others can’t decide what to do.

The thing is, thanks to social media, no one goes away fully.  We’ve all heard the phrase "they’ll live on in our hearts" and it’s true but now, those who have passed on can live on through their own words, their own voice, their own face through social media–in a tiny tiny, but significant way, it’s like they’re immortal. 

So, when I found Meg’s blog I saw the YouTube video she recorded back on the 21st and immediately thought "Oh, @bsimi">@bsimi is just kidding or something."  If I hadn’t Googled any further, I’d have never known the difference. 

I’m not sure what I’m getting at, really.  I think maybe I’m hoping stories like this one will encourage us all to blog/vlog/record/document/whatever our lives more. 

As scary as it is to contemplate, we may check out before we expect to.  Best to make sure there’s something people can remember us by.

Just my ¥2, of course.

Totally forgot to add this link:

megan-porter.gonetoosoon.org/

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Why Jury Duty in the 21st Century is a Joke


by ThePete 7:53 pm 2009-05-16
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Last week I had to show up at a courthouse to see if the City of New York needed me for a jury. Luckily, after two days, they let me go, case-free. I say “luckily” not because I don’t believe in doing my civic duty. I do–I’ve served on a jury once before and enjoyed it, though it was a little scary sending some gang-guys up the river for ten years (I don’t like forcing anyone to do anything, but we did find that they had committed a crime).

No, the problem I have with jury duty in today’s world has nothing to do with the “serving on a jury” part and everything to do with how the the whole thing works.

1) No pay. In some circumstances there is compensation for jurors. In LA, it was something like $5 a day. For only some (but not all) jurors here in the Big Apple, you get $40 a day. That’s still a joke. Most employers I’ve worked for do not pay for hours you don’t work. So, the idea that it’s “our duty” to serve is ridiculous. It’s our duty to provide for ourselves and our families while having enough money to play our role in society as consumers to keep the economy going. I can’t do that on $40 a day. Not while living in a major American city, anyway.

2) I’ve been sued. I lost because I couldn’t afford a lawyer who would force the collection agency suing me to prove I owed them money. Our civil legal system is a system that believes in the phrase “guilty until proven innocent” which is completely the opposite of what I believe to be fair and just. Showing up for jury duty is supporting a system that victimizes the poor and uneducated. But I do it because they’ll fine you over a grand if you don’t go. Funny, I don’t remember being threatened with a fine if I didn’t vote in the last election.

3) Our government, at large, has shown that it, in itself, is a joke, unable to protect us from terrorists, hurricanes, or even useless, unannounced photo-ops that disrupt a huge chunk of NYC. 8 million more voters wanted Obama in office, only months after getting into office, we see him stick with many of the same policies as the Bush administration. This is on top of that fact that the city wants me to see the inside of a court room as a juror long before George W. Bush will see the inside of one as a defendant in his own war crimes trial makes me wonder just what my “civic duty” will be done for.

4) The jury orientation video they show us here in NYC compares the modern court system to the court system used to try witches.

I shit you not.

They hired actors and reenacted a witch trial where they throw a woman into a lake and watch her drown, clearly informing us that we should feel lucky that we no longer do this. Yeah, tell that to the dude who got waterboarded 80+ times, man. Give me a break.

I’m so glad we have progressed as a society!

What a stupid thing to be thankful for. Why not thank the world for existing for another day? Or thank the universe for not imploding? Or thank clocks for not suddenly starting to run backwards?

So, here’s how we fix the jury duty system in the US:

1) Pay jurors what they make at their regular job or pass a law forcing employers to pay employees while on jury duty. It’s simply not fair that the individual must suffer while the company does not.

2) Only call citizens with employment. Come on, man–I’m trying to get a small business going and I lose two days in a row because I have to do my civic duty? What about my civic duty to become a productive citizen? No, call the folks with jobs and make sure point 1 is done. We shouldn’t be punished for being out of work even if it’s by choice. Think of it like taxing the rich more than the poor.

3) Stop with the patronizing videos. I don’t need Diane Sawyer telling me how “most people find jury duty enjoyable” or a lecture on civics and history from Ed Bradley who died three years ago.

4) Understand that government is government on all levels unless attempts are made to differentiate between federal, state and local–which you can’t really do easily. So, when government anywhere looks incompetent, sadly it reflects on all of it. It may not be fair, but neither is our legal system. It’s the people in the system who must change things so that faith in this system can be restored. Personally, I don’t see the difference between the most powerful, suit-wearing white men and the minority/disabled/females I always see working in courthouses.

Someone once said that all politics is local–well, then isn’t that a good reason to make sure government on the lowest levels works the best? Why is it that I already think the NYC government is kinda crappy? I’ll tell you–because I haven’t been a NYC resident for a year and I’ve already gotten called for jury duty. When I go, it takes them two days to not stick me on a case unlike Los Angeles, who only took one day to not stick me on a case.

To top it all off, if I had been placed on a case, I’d have been placed in a civil case–like the one I was in, as a defendant, against a collection agency that was, in fact, suing me illegally. Yeah, turns out that despite the fact that I had no recent (within the preceding 6 years) credit card debt the judge in the case didn’t bother to ask to see any proof that what the credit card agency was accusing me of was true. Yeah, that’s our “justice” system for ya.

So, anyone in New York City who was looking for a jury for their civil case last week, be glad I didn’t end up on your jury–unless you’re the individual going against a company or two–then I’m your man, assuming you’re just looking to win and not hoping for a fair trial.

And please don’t tell me to suck it up, man. I’m so done with that kind of thing. If we spend every challenge “sucking it up” things will never change.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 1.0/1 (2 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Can We Just Stop Blaming the Poor Folks for Our Crappy Economy PLEASE?


by ThePete 3:06 pm 2009-05-05
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

I am sick of seeing/hearing people explain that the cause of our crappy economy is/are the sub-prime mortgage defaults. This seems to place the onus for the mess that is upon us on the poor in the US.

Think about how stupid that is.

Let’s blame the poor for our bad economy.

Right, that’s logical… or it would be, if we lived on Bizarro World. How is it that people with little money can mess things up for those with lots?

First, you have to admit that the defaulted sub-prime loans were just a single factor (of many) in all of this. Then, you have to ask a very important question.

Recently, I came across yet another person on a socnet laying blame for our economic crisis at the feet of people unable to pay off their mortgages. The following is what I posted in response–it includes that very important question:

I think the bigger problem is why soooo many people couldn’t keep up with their mortgage payments. If so very many people defaulted that it caused this massive failure of our economy, it seems more important to me that we ask why so many people couldn’t pay their loan payments. Surely, they can’t ALL be “lazy” or whatever.

I’d much rather solve the problem of so many people unable to make enough money to live comfortably, pay their bills and stay healthy.

However, in typical ThePete-fashion, I’ve a bit more to say. So here’s that:

So, if they weren’t all deadbeats, why couldn’t they pay their mortgages? Because they hadn’t seen a raise or a promotion in their jobs in a while? They lost their job because of downsizing, outsourcing or a personal medical issue? How much of those reasons are economically related?

How many of those reasons are related to the business’ well-being put in front of the employee’s well-being? To me this always comes back to all of us putting the right of a company to survive above the right of an individual to have a job that allows them to play their part in society.

And which would you rather do?

1) Prop up a faulty system, allowing the people and structures that failed once an opportunity to fail again

2) Let businesses fail, sending everyone, business owners and employees alike, a massive wake-up call that they can’t just assume everything will just work the way it should without folks paying attention and thinking for themselves

I know I’ve loaded those options a bit, but it strikes me as odd that we should save the employees by saving the bosses who got greedy and were the largest catalyst of all this in the first place.

And on top of that, you’ve got to wonder about a system that is so unstable that, when one thing goes wrong, it falls to pieces.

No, to me there’s something very very basic about our economic that is overflowing with wrongability.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

MainStream Media Love tehPirates NOW, but Where were They Last Year?


by ThePete 2:26 pm 2009-04-20
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

News.bbc.co.uk reported on this over the weekend and it struck me as very odd. The media seems to be making such a big deal out of these pirates now, but with pirates commiting statistically approaching 1 attack per day last year, where has the MSM been?

That said, I don’t think the pirates should be getting that much coverage anyway since they’re really not pirates in any real sense. I mean, these are Somalis for crying out loud–it’s not like they’re plundering ships for gold–what kind of funding do they even have?

The other day on Democracy Now, they had a guy on who said what we call “Somali Pirates” the Somali people call “the Somali Coast Guard”. What do you want? They’re a 3rd World country!

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

US Gov to Boycott Racism Conference in Rare Show of Honesty


by ThePete 10:52 am 2009-04-20
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Reuters.com reported over the weekend that the US will not be attending a United Nations conference on racism. The reason? Apparently, the declaration the conference wants everyone to sign onto calls Zionism racist.

I don’t know about you, but when a single religion/race gets it’s own country, I’m thinking that’s racist.

Regardless of that, however, it seems pretty ridiculous for the USG to decide that because of this one difference of opinion they’re going to boycott the whole thing. For a country founded on the blood of millions of Native Americans, built on the backs of generations of African American slaves, which has exploited cheap immigrant labor from the beginning (and still does to this day) this move by the US seems like a rare example of honesty.

How ironic that we have a black president right now. I suppose it just goes to show you that there is no real difference between the races–a black man can be just as racist as the white guys who came before him.

Or maybe… could this be Classism? After all, the idea here is that we are boycotting the UN conference on racism, thus sacrificing our support of all races in favor of just one–and it’s a race (well, religion, really) stereotypically known for controlling wealth (not that I believe this–I just know others do).

I’ve got nothing against anyone’s belief system (believe what you need to in order to get by, I say) but when you use your religious beliefs to harm the rights of others (COUGHpalestineCOUGH) I start to have problems.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

How I (don’t) Celebrate Easter (as an Atheist)


by ThePete 3:28 pm 2009-04-12
Categories | $ | Comments (6) »
listen via talkr

OK, I hadn’t planned on blogging anything special on Easter this year but a Christian friend of mine replied to a microblog post I put up earlier today and it got me thinking about a few things:

1) The majority of Americans are Christian.

2) A tiny fraction of Americans are atheists.

3) Atheists don’t get holidays.

4) When we get snarky in the face of quite a few public displays of affection for God, Jesus, etc, why aren’t we just ignored like we usually are?

It seems disingenuous, to me, that the majority feels the need to defend itself against the minority. As an average atheist, it seems like I should have the right to be exponentially louder than the average Christian since there are so many of them out there. I need to speak up in order to be heard over the voices of all those believers.

Yet, I feel like I get lectured when I do speak up for myself and my beliefs.

I don’t need to be told about how there’s a God, or how Jesus died for my sins or whatever else. I’ve heard it all before. None of it is enough for me–not that I’m saying anything against you.

My friend explained that he felt the need to defend the intelligence of believers despite me not saying anything about the intelligence of believers in the first place. Really, it’s not about how smart or dumb you are–it’s about what you choose to believe and what you choose to do with that belief.

If it helps you to believe that there is a benevolent being watching over us that can be appealed to for help, by all means, believe in Him. Personally, I’d rather assume that there is no God and behave according to my own morals.

What bothers me is when people who normally talk about politics, current events, or other non-God-related things start talking about how “He is Risen”. Suddenly, I’m wondering why they felt the need to say such a thing to me. Yes, OK, you’re Christian, Happy Easter, enjoy the chocolate.

Then I see it again and again and I’m suddenly feeling like a freak for not believing that Jesus even existed. But whatever, man–people believe what they want and I’m fine with that. But on days like today, it’s hard to move on, so I joke about how I’m going to take a moment to marvel at how the seasons work at keeping us alive and then watch “The God That Wasn’t There” again.

Of course, my snarkiness is taken as disrespectful, or, at the very least, in need of a reply/counter-argument/etc. It seems like the majority can’t leave the minority to it’s whinyness. And that’s ultimately, fine, too–I mean, it’s the Internet, right? The majority of the web is porn and what isn’t porn is divided up between illegal file sharing and useless arguments (it would seem).

What bothers me is when a belief in something un-provable replaces the known facts of a situation.

I could die of an aneurysm before I finish typing up this post. However, some of you would suggest “well, say a prayer, make sure God is happy with you and He won’t let that happen.”

Right, or I could just understand that I could die and move forward with the idea that I should live my life to the fullest because I could die at any time.

See? It’s up to personal choice.

No right or wrong answer. Both sides can’t prove they are right.

So, if you’re a “believer” please, the next time you see one of us “non-believers” commenting about how we don’t believe or are annoyed by religious holidays or whatever, keep your opinion to yourself. You’re the majority. Anything you say is going to sound just as pompous, self-righteous and insulting as what we said in the first place. The difference is, we’ve already heard what you have to say and that’s why we’re atheists.

It might serve you to listen to our opinions since you may not have heard them before–it’s not like we atheist have dramatically influenced culture for centuries the way y’all have.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

My Own Battlestar Galactica Series Finale Script (Part 1 Complete!)


by ThePete 3:23 am 2009-03-16
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

UPDATE: Sorry, Drop.io is behaving very strangely. Their direct PDF link didn’t work so I’ve replaced it with a snip URL link, which should hopefully work better. OK, on with the original text for this post:

WHEW. Done with Act 5 and it’s only ten pages too long!! Not bad for a first draft, I should think!

To my credit, I wrote 21 pages today then cut three out but still ended up with a 57 page script. Not bad for a week’s work.

Don’t know what the heck I’m talking about? You should probably read my blog post that explains why I am writing my very own Battlestar Galactica series finale script.

In the meantime, here it is! My complete part 1 of a 2 part series finale of Battlestar Galactica written by me:

Direct link to pdf

I’m no longer going to use the Scribd embed from Drop.io since they’re flaky. The last time I used one it only displayed the first 7 pages of the PDF and the previous embeds just vanished after a few days. Not sure what’s up with that, but I’m definitely going to complain to Drop.io. I am a paying customer after all.

AS USUAL, BATTLESTAR GALACTICA is (C) Universal Studios! The script itself is (C) ThePete! But UniStu can have it if I can come into pitch. Fairnuff, methinks.

NOTES FOR THIS SCRIPT: Not much to say except I’m pretty happy with it so far. I keep wracking my brains for any characters or plotlines I may have missed that need to be tied up, but I think I’ve managed to include them all or will include them in part 2.

PLEASE NOTE: This is a first draft script–I have not reread the entire thing and have not proofread it! THERE ARE MISTAKES, just chill. I’m not Mozart. However, I think if the story is good, who cares about the FX, right?

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

The Actual Universal Declaration of Human Rights


by ThePete 4:24 pm 2008-12-11
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

OK, so, yesterday was One Day for Human Rights, right? Head over to OneDayForHumanRights.com for more on that. But the way I look at it, every day should be a day when we defend human rights, right?
Now, I’m just a blogger–the only “weapons” I use are my words. So, that’s how I’m defending human rights. Speaking up and speaking out–hey, in some countries, that would get me thrown in jail.

So here’s day 2. I’m not saying I’ll be able to keep this up forever, but I’ve got a few ideas for posts. For starters, I thought I’d post the entire Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Sure, you can find it elsewhere, but until these rights are actually universally respected around the globe, it can’t help to keep repeating them over and over, right?

Now, on OneDayForHumanRights.com, they have a post that includes the entire text of the UDHR, but also links to where they got it from. Here’s where I got the below text from:

www.unhchr.ch/udhr/lang/eng.htm

Find it in other languages here:

www.unhchr.ch/udhr/navigate/alpha.htm

OneDayForHumanRights.com also made available, in PDF format, a flier about human rights abuses around the world and the UDHR in it’s entirety. I’m hosting copies of those PDFs here at ThePete.Com along with a text version of the UDHR.

Here’s an intro about the UDHR from it’s Wikipedia page:

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is a declaration adopted by the United Nations General Assembly (10 December 1948 at Palais de Chaillot, Paris). The Guinness Book of Records describes the UDHR as the “Most Translated Document” in the world. The Declaration arose directly from the experience of the Second World War and represents the first global expression of rights to which all human beings are inherently entitled. It consists of 30 articles which have been elaborated in subsequent international treaties, regional human rights instruments, national constitutions and laws. The International Bill of Human Rights consists of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and its two Optional Protocols. In 1966 the General Assembly adopted the two detailed Covenants, which complete the International Bill of Human Rights; and in 1976, after the Covenants had been ratified by a sufficient number of individual nations, the Bill took on the force of international law.

So, there you go–not only is it a guide book, but it’s a law book, too.

Here it is, just for you, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights:

Preamble

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,

Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,

Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,

Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in cooperation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,

Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,

Now, therefore,

The General Assembly,

Proclaims this Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.

Article 1

All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

Article 2

Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.

Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

Article 3

Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

Article 4

No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.

Article 5

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Article 6

Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Article 7

All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

Article 8

Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

Article 9

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

Article 10

Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.

Article 11

1. Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.
2. No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed.

Article 12

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Article 13

1. Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each State.
2. Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

Article 14

1. Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.
2. This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 15

1. Everyone has the right to a nationality.
2. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.

Article 16

1. Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.
2. Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.
3. The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.

Article 17

1. Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.
2. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

Article 18

Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

Article 19

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

Article 20

1. Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.
2. No one may be compelled to belong to an association.

Article 21

1. Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.
2. Everyone has the right to equal access to public service in his country.
3. The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.

Article 22

Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.

Article 23

1. Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.
2. Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.
3. Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.
4. Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.

Article 24

Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.

Article 25

1. Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
2. Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.

Article 26

1. Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.
2. Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.
3. Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.

Article 27

1. Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits.
2. Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.

Article 28

Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.

Article 29

1. Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.
2. In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.
3. These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 30

Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.

I’m thinking it’s pretty sad that it’s the 21st century and we even need one of these things. Makes you wonder just how far we have actually come as a species and as a culture.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Human Rights and the Promises of Our Leaders


by ThePete 5:24 pm 2008-12-10
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Human Rights are something that, here in America, aren’t really thought about until someone we know or care about becomes a victim to them. In some areas in the world everyone knows someone who has had their rights abridged or outright squashed. We’ve all heard of those places, so I won’t go into them here. Just know that for all of our own advancements here in America, the vast majority of humanity has been left behind. Most of Earth’s citizens are still waiting to see a world that protects the rights of all humans.

In this sense, our leaders have universally let us down. The role of governments (and the leaders who run them) is supposed to be to protect the rights of their citizens. The thing is, we have trouble making sure that happens here in the US. There are still too many people who are silenced or worse. Sure, it’s easy to point to things that have happened under the Bush Administration, but the reality is no US administration has put human rights front and center. In fact, in previous decades and even centuries, the USG has sponsored military actions, coups and even full-blown wars solely in the interest of securing capitalism as the dominant economic system in other countries.

So, when someone talks to you about human rights and how they should be supported, don’t think that just because you live in the US or another western country you don’t need to worry about them. Here in the US we still have a long way to go. In the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, written sixty years ago, there is a passage about marriage:

Article 16

1. Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.
2. Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.
3. The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.

Guess what Prop 8 over in California is about. Yep. Gay marriage. Stopping gays from getting marriage is a violation of the UDHR. Our leaders shouldn’t even allow something like Prop 8 to get put up to a vote since it violates basic human rights. Yet, there it is.

Human rights activist Jack Healy posted about the UDHR’s birthday a couple days ago on HuffPo and in that post he said, in part, this in reference to the UDHR:

By the year 2010, 42% of the world will be under the age of 21. As was seen in the recent American election, there is a clamoring for change amongst this demographic. This exists not only for young people at home, but all over the world. When injustice occurs in far corners of the globe, this document empowers the innocent against the oppressor. Just as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. pointed to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights as an example of justice and equality, so to will this new generation need a rulebook to combat oppression.

Such a rulebook already exists in this Declaration. For 60 years, governments have let this document gather dust in a closet.

…and our governments, across the planet, have let us down.

I’m not an anarchist, but ya know, now that I think about it…

Read the Universal Declaration of Human Rights over at OneDayForHumanRights.com

Hell, I think there should be a 365daysAYearForHumanRights.com!

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

One Day for Human Rights


by ThePete 1:59 am 2008-12-10
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

I’ll be blogging more about human rights today, inline with the website OneDayForHumanRights.com

In the meantime, head over there and see what’s up.

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Using Women in Ads: Making It Harder for Women (and Men) for Years


by ThePete 7:10 pm 2008-11-23
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr


So, I was procrastinating earlier this evening (I guess I still am!) and came across a post at BlogOfHilarity.com entitled: "The 9 most disturbingly misogynistic old print ads" It was linked to by HumanFolly on Twitter and knowing her status as a women's issues blogger, I knew I would want to check it out.  The post features nine really pretty messed up ads featuring women in less than equal positions to the men who probably created the ads.  My favorite (and, in my opinion, the most demented of the bunch) is the pic in this post.  Holeee crap–could that little girl be more depressed looking?

It's like she knows the years of oppression and self-denial that are ahead of her.  Or perhaps she's just stressed about the economy?

Either way, the little girl in this ad is just wrong.  Kids are supposed to be happy, not looking like the latest model in the "childbot" line from Stepford Industries.  What's worse is that the little tyke is not the most disturbing thing about this ad–as the original blog post mentions: 

There are so many things wrong with this ad…the emotionally disturbed
girl, the lifelessly colored tricks and, of course, the fact that the
ad is saying 5 year-old “women” need love.

Yeah, pretty messed up.  I think it's also a little creepy how Mom is right behind her daughter, making sure she eats the sugar-and-chemical-laden corporate foodstuff and it's not like the little girl is given any options in the matter.

Ugh…

Is it any surprise we haven't had a woman president yet?  With decades of programming through pop-culture (including ads like these) it would take a woman of extraordinary strength, confidence, persuasiveness and diplomacy to surmount the Kilamanjaro-sized pile of negative propaganda we've all been forced to consume as a culture since the dawn of media.

Maybe if we spliced together DNA from Oprah and Obama we could create a female clone capable of winning everyone over.

Anyone know a genetic scientist?  Get them on this now!

Even more irony pops up when you see the ads that appear next to the blog post on BlogOfHilarity.com–the ads for CollegeHumor and Snorg Tees are the ones I saw.  CollegeHumor advertized "Cute College Girl of the Week" with pictures of women in bikinis. Meanwhile, the Snorg ad featured a cute-as-hell young women looking like she was about to take her shirt off.  On the shirt is the message "We're going streaking."

Don't get me wrong–I love women.  I love looking at attractive women–but I respect them, too.  In fact, the smarter a woman is the more attracted I am to her.  I can talk politics and philosophy with TheWife, which is great.  My current movie crush is Naomi Klein who writes about the negative aspects of the free market in her book "The Shock Doctrine."  Most porn alternatively bores or repulses me, so I tend to just troll Flickr for pictures that don't make me hate humanity (aka porn I actually find hot).  So, it baffles me as to why advertisers need to cater to the lowest common denominator all the time.  That cute chick in the Snorg ad didn't make me want to buy a T-shirt.  Neither did the bikini girls in the CollegeHumor ad make me want to visit that site for a cute college girl of the week. 

But I guess it works since sex keeps being used to sell. 

I guess I'm a total freak, huh? o_O

Ah well. 

Hm… I wonder Naomi Klein would ever do a bikini calendar with excerpts from her books in the margins…O_O

Posted by email from thepete’s posterous

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

MACROSS FRONTIER (2008)


by ThePete 1:36 pm 2008-11-14
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

It’s Friday once again and here’s another anime Pocket Review for ya!


Buy the soundtrack

Positive Experience/Entertaining? This series was a tremendous amount of fun and at times was even moving.

Technically any good? This series represents the best of everything the Macross saga has to offer–the best music, the best animation, the best acting (not that previous acting was bad) and probably even the best writing. This is a series that is one-part sequel, one-part remake, one-part homage to everything that has led up to it. Viewers new to the franchise will probably have no trouble enjoying this series without having any previous knowledge–the story stands very much on its own, though more than a few references will be missed without having seen what has come before.

Meanwhile, old fans of the Macross universe will see a lot of great callbacks to the original Macross and Macross 7, as well. However, the score is composed by musical genius Yoko Kanno, which means that even covers of the very dated and cheesy music from both previous Macross series sound incredible (yes, even Kanno-san’s cover of “Watashi No Kare Wa Piloto” pretty much rocks). The story holds up pretty nicely, though the wrap-up is a bit too neat for my personal tastes. Of course, the acting is as solid as ever thanks to the Japanese taking their cartoons seriously. :) I should probably stop bagging on western dubs since I haven’t watched one in ages. Then again, I did try to watch a few minutes of Christian Bale as Howl in Howl’s Moving Castle and I couldn’t help but cringe.

How did it leave me feeling? Definitely happy. The series ends with an amazing homage to the Macross universe as a whole and really made me feel bad to see it all finished. The good news is that there has been a Macross Frontier movie announced, though I haven’t heard if it’s going to be a remake of the series or a sequel to it, or both (the Japanese have done all three at times). My hope is for the sequel–I fell in love with these characters. There are also two more Macross titles to review, so be back here next Friday for my review of Macross II followed by Macross Zero which, while made earlier, reside at either end of the Macross timeline.

Final Rating? GSN – Go See Now – this is a classic anime crowd-pleaser, but also works well to please the purist. After finishing this up, I had a hard time going back to older anime, both for quality and story. It felt like going from caviar to tuna fish in a can. Still, I love seafood, so it’s cool. ^_^

Sadly, Macross Frontier has yet to see an American release. However, you can pick up Kanno’s score from Amazon.com if you have $50 laying around. T_T

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
Rating: 0.0/1 (0 votes cast)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Esha Momeni, Iranian-American Women’s Rights Advocate Freed in Iran


by ThePete 7:18 pm 2008-11-11
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Well, here’s so more (mostly) good news. Remember that women’s rights advocate I blogged about a few weeks back? Esha Momeni was arrested in Tehran, Iran, on October 15 for charges that would eventually be stated as “propaganda against the state”. The thing to note is that she was in Iran working on her CSUN grad thesis on improving the worldview of Iranian women.

So, naturally the Iranian government would take that as propaganda against the state.

Anyway, so, the good news is that she got released yesterday on bail. All her Iranian family members had to do was give the police the deed to their home as a guarantee that Momeni wouldn’t flee the country–flee the country? Why would she do that?? :P

Regardless, this is good news. Momeni was being kept in solitary confinement, apparently. Not good.

Find out more about Esha Momeni at the official blog covering her arrest and release here:

for-esha.blogspot.com/

Or read about her release at CNN.com here:

www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/11/11/iran.student.released/index.html?eref=rss_latest

Check out my original post on Momeni here:

thepete.com/esha-momeni-womens-advocate-arrested-in-iran

VN:F [1.2.0_562]
<