Skip to content
thepete.com - » TheBig Business thepete.com

TheAdvertising:
:gnisitrevdAehT

Obama Asks Us to Take Responsibility: This isn’t Bizarro World, It’s Parody Earth (pt 5) My Solution Edition!


by ThePete 9:00 am 2009-09-25
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

OK, now after bitching about Obama calling for Americans to take responsibility for their health care by paying for insurance, I’d like to suggest my solution:

Learn from history.

You remember history, right? It’s that thing that happened before now.

It’s got all sorts of lessons for us to learn about what to do and what not to do–especially when you look at other countries!

See, in every other “civilized” nation in the world, health care is a right, not something you pay for. After all, what would “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” be without “life”?

So, I say you keep private insurers where they are for the folks that don’t trust government-run health care, but start up a UK-style NHS for those of us who don’t trust private health care or the insurance companies.

Who will pay for it? Well, ideally, us–in that we’ll still be alive thanks to it–but also our kids who will also benefit from it. If we’re REALLY smart, we’ll even take the money we normally spend on our military bases around the world and spend it on health care.

After all, if we keep going with the current system, tens of thousands will continue to die every year, not thanks to terrorist bombings (terrorists aren’t that good at killing), but thanks to a lack of affordable health care.

So, yes, I’m suggesting not only that we learn from history (GASP!) but also that we learn from OTHER COUNTRIES. (HEAVENS!)

Oh and we should also check the stupid labels at the door, too.

All this crap about “socialism” isn’t going to help anyone on either side of the political wall. Hitler wasn’t a bad guy because he wanted his citizens to have universal health care (did he?) he was a bad guy because he slaughter loads of people after he invaded a bunch of countries without a good reason.

Not that we would EVER do that!

COUGHnativeamericansCOUGH
COUGHiraqandafghanistanCOUGH

But I digress.

The point is, ditch the labels, learn from history and other countries who have done this successfully before.

Nothing will be perfect so grow the hell up.

All I know is that I’d like to go to the dentist for the first time in ten years. The two times I’ve been to the doctors in the same amount of time was when I went to the LA Free Clinic.

Everyone knows that I’m not some lazy bastard either, it’s obvious I’m not freeloading on the system or whatever. I work my ass off all the time, I just don’t make a lot (or any) money for it. I like to think that my good health and, in fact, my life is worth a bit of your money, just as much as I already feel the same about your health and life.

But until you start clicking that Paypal donate link (and not even for a while after that), or hire me, I can’t afford Mr. President’s plan.

So, what the hell are people like me supposed to do?

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Obama Asks Us to Take Responsibility: This isn’t Bizarro World, It’s Parody Earth (pt 4)


by ThePete 9:00 am 2009-09-24
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Yep! Still going!

So, in part 1 the issue was Obama actually explaining to ABC News that car and health insurance are comparable.

In part 2, I focused on the lack of responsibility taken by the USG to keep practical poisons away from us.

Last time, in part 3, it was all about spending buckets on alleged military threats instead of providing universal health care for free.

This time I’d like to delve into the nitty-gritty of how Obama’s plan would even function. OK, so the understanding I have is that “most” Americans would be forced to have health insurance. Those that couldn’t afford it would get a tax credit.

Not very useful for people who are out of work and therefore aren’t paying any taxes.

See, ya can’t get a tax credit if you’re not making enough money to pay taxes.

AND, if you’re not making enough money to pay taxes, odds are, you’re not going to be able to afford health insurance either, so guess what!

If you can afford it the least, you get no help.

New boss same as the old boss.

“No Child Left Behind” ended up with a lot of child’s behinds left.

Now Obama-brand “change” seems to be promising to be about as effective, with Obamacare equating to “Obamacares about corporations more than it does people.”

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Obama Asks Us to Take Responsibility: This isn’t Bizarro World, It’s Parody Earth (pt 3)


by ThePete 9:00 am 2009-09-23
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Gah! Yes, I still have more to say about Obama forcing “most” of us to “take responsibility” and pay some greedy-ass insurance company for health insurance. I’m even still harping on Barry’s use of the word “responsibility.”

In part 1 of my “Parody Earth” series, I talked about how unfair it was that the corporations were getting this gift of all these new citizens being forced to cough up cash for healthcare.

In part 2 I talked about how the government isn’t taking responsibility for itself as protector of its citizens. To me there’s an even deeper hypocrisy to it than simply allowing the FAA to permit corporations to all but poison us and the FCC to allow ads for said corporations’ practical poison to get pounded down our throats.

This is part 3 and in it I say that my government should STFU about me taking responsibility for my health when it would rather rob American soldiers, Iraqis and Afghanis of their health by putting them in harms way.

Even worse: our tax dollars help do it!

So, rather than provide health care to millions of Americans for free, they’re going to pay over a trillion dollars to fight a non-existent threat in two foreign countries (and what has it gotten us, Obama has said, Al Qaeda is still out to get us).

That’s always been the big gripe from universal health care naysayers:

“How are you going to pay for it?”

How are we going to pay for Iraq and Afghanistan?

“Well, we don’t have a choice for those!”

????

So, tens of thousands die every year due to a lack of health care, yet, somehow we HAVE to stop a tiny group of extremists by invading two countries??

Just who kills more people? Terrorists or health issues like obesity or cancer?

Seriously: Can you answer the question why we spend so much on fighting wars and so little on curing disease and keeping people healthy?

I bet you can’t.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Obama Asks Us to Take Responsibility: This isn’t Bizarro World, It’s Parody Earth (pt 2)


by ThePete 9:00 am 2009-09-22
Categories | $ | Comments (2) »
listen via talkr

Let’s review:

On Sunday September 20, 2009, President Barack Obama gave interviews to a number of Sunday morning talk shows to talk about, among other things, his plan for health care reform in America. A September 20, 2009 article on Bloomberg.com explains:

“For us to say that you’ve got to take a responsibility to get health insurance is absolutely not a tax increase,” Obama said in an interview on ABC’s “This Week” program. “Right now everybody in America, just about, has to get auto insurance. Nobody considers that a tax increase.”

This is what is really starting to make me sick about politicians. Ridiculous generalizations. However, while some folks are mad that he’s comparing human health to the damage a car makes when it crashes, we miss what makes me even more sick to my stomach when it comes to politicians.

Blatant hypocrisy.

Sure, we’re all hypocritical at some point in our lives. But come on, man–how ANYone in government thinks it’s fair to point to the American people and tell US to be responsible is beyond me.

Seriously. The President of the United States wants me to be responsible about my health care.

How about you kiss my ass?

Since 2003, I’ve been eating 90% whole/real foods, avoiding anything processed when it’s possible. No easy feat no thanks to the FDA and the FCC.

Seriously, folks, ya gotta ask yourself why sweeteners are added to FRUIT JUICE?

Why is there high fructose corn syrup in BREAD??

It’s because the FDA says it’s OK.

Why does practically EVERY commercial I see on TV during cartoons or other kids programming try to sell me sugared cereal or cookies or candy or soda or something else bad for me?

Why is it that the FCC allows advertisements for things that, if consumed to excess, WILL KILL YOU?

Cigarette ads on TV aren’t legal, yet one cigarette a month won’t kill anybody.

However, eat a pint of ice cream a day and you’ll die of a coronary (and tax the health care system along the way).

Come on, Barry–it’s your job as part of the government to PROTECT your citizens. THAT’S THE DEAL. But all you’re doing is protecting the right of corporations to sell us shit that MAKES US SICK.

And you tell US to be responsible and pay for health insurance?

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Obama Asks Us to Take Responsibility: This isn’t Bizarro World, It’s Parody Earth (pt 1)


by ThePete 9:00 am 2009-09-21
Categories | $ | Comments (3) »
listen via talkr

Seriously.

President Obama said the following in an ABC News interview today: “For us to say that you’ve got to take a responsibility to get health insurance is absolutely not a tax increase,”

Uh-huh. Let’s think about this for thirty seconds.

He’s right. It’s not a tax–it’s a government hand out to corporations. By passing a law that says we MUST pay a health insurance provider for services, we’re not paying a tax, we’re paying a tithe–like the kind you give in a church–a tribute to God, basically.

I’m an atheist, so I don’t give to churches. Likewise, I don’t believe in the insurance system (health or otherwise). I think it’s a terrible system that allows people to get rich off of the suffering of others.

I don’t care if they’ll be forced to cover me, I don’t want to support them.

But if Obama has his way, I will have to.

Obama also said the following in that ABC interview: “Right now everybody in America, just about, has to get auto insurance. Nobody considers that a tax increase.”

NO, THEY DON’T HAVE TO GET CAR INSURANCE.

Man, do I HATE politicians who pull this shit!

Just because YOU drive a car doesn’t mean EVERYONE DOES.

As it happens, I live in NEW YORK CITY.

But guess what: I sold my car in 2004–four years before I moved to NYC, when I still lived in Los Angeles.

So guess what, Obama and America: one-size does NOT fit all and I don’t appreciate the suggestion that I HAVE to pay into a system that I morally object to.

I sold my car in order to avoid spending hundreds of dollars a year on:

Maintenance
Fuel
Registration
Parking
Insurance

So, Barry, don’t tell me about how health insurance is equivalent to car insurance because it’s not.

I stopped driving a car half-a-decade ago. I can’t stop driving my body.

What you’re suggesting is nothing but a juicy present for the insurance companies.

Funny how banks and corporations get what amounts to health care from the government while we living, breathing humans have give up our freedom to opt out of systems we don’t believe in.

Part 2 coming tomorrow.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Think 18,000 Lives are Worth Saving? Then Let’s have a National Health Care System.


by ThePete 9:00 am 2009-09-16
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

OK, this is the kind of shit that makes me really mad when it comes to our health care system and our supposed “news media” whose very job it is is to keep us informed of the world around us.

First, why doesn’t the media keep us informed of numbers like this? They’re just a JOKE at this point. Second, when the media finally DOES do its job, why does no one seem to care very much?

Nicholas D. Kristof wrote an op-ed piece at NYTimes.com that quotes a staggering figure–one that made me slide off the runway of my day when I first read it. I was dumbfounded. Now, hopefully, you are, too.

Here’s a cutting from Kristof’s op-ed:

In 2006, Nikki White died at age 32. “Nikki didn’t die from lupus,” her doctor, Amylyn Crawford, told Mr. Reid. “Nikki died from complications of the failing American health care system.”

“She fell through the cracks,” Nikki’s mother, Gail Deal, told me grimly. “When you bury a child, it’s the worst thing in the world. You never recover.”

We now have a chance to reform this cruel and capricious system. If we let that chance slip away, there will be another Nikki dying every half-hour.

That’s how often someone dies in America because of a lack of insurance, according to a study by a branch of the National Academy of Sciences. Over a year, that amounts to 18,000 American deaths.

What.

The.

Fuck.

When I first read that, I immediately made the same connection Kristof does in the very next paragraph in his piece.

Every year SIX TIMES the number of people who died on 911 die because they can’t afford proper health care.

Yet, to avenge the deaths of 3000 we’ve spent over a trillion dollars.

Which would you rather do?

1) Spend a trillion and cause the deaths of thousands of American soldiers, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and Afghanis (and fail to capture bin Laden or bring stability to the countries you invade)

or

2) Save 18,000 lives a year and improve the lives of those 18,000 and many more while spending nowhere near a trillion dollars in the process

It’s a simple choice, in my mind. We’re not any more safer for taking option #1. In fact, it’s possible the deep-ass hole our economy is in might not be so deep if it weren’t for us invading two countries.

Just think about it:

Spend a few hundred billion and save the lives of tens of thousands of Americans or spend over a trillion to stop more 911s from happening. You’d need three more 911s to see as many dead as you would not paying for poor people’s health care. It would take 107 more Oklahoma City bombings or 7.5 Pearl Harbor attacks to see as many Americans dead as we do the number of dead caused by a lack of affordable health care.

Sure, sure, health care companies need to make a living. That’s why they exist. Apparently.

That whole “saving lives” thing? Yeah, that’s um… hey, what IS that about, anyway?

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Tropicana Uses Very Deceptive Packaging for their new “Orange Juice Beverage with Vitamins”


by ThePete 1:29 pm 2009-09-03
Categories | $ | Comments (9) »
listen via talkr


This is really horrible. Seriously. This is just short of lying. In fact, I’m going to say this is lying (but if you’re a Tropicana lawyer reading this, it’s not lying, it’s just really, really, really, deceptive). The packaging shows us a glass of what sure looks like orange juice–there’s an orange slice in the corner of the front of the carton, and at the top it says “SOME PULP.” These all suggest that the content of the packaging is, in fact, orange juice. In the image attached to this post, I’ve pointed out other aspects of the packaging that prove that it isn’t orange juice.

I came across this stuff when I felt the distant fatigue of a cold coming on. I asked @siskita to pick me up some orange juice on the way home from a recording session last night and she picked up this stuff. At first-glance, I knew something was wrong with it–but not in a way that I could say “hey, that’s not orange juice.”

The packaging just looked “off.”

Ironically, it was the 1.8-quart container that made me look closer–it’s not a half-gallon like most cartons of orange juice.

Yes, that’s right, not only do you not get your typical half-gallon of orange juice, you don’t actually get a half-gallon. Deceptive all ’round. But why all this subterfuge? Making the carton smaller was an obvious money-saver, but why not fill the smaller carton with
orange juice
?

After a bit of research, I began to work out a theory as to why Tropicana has decided to start selling us orange-juice-like liquids. Turns out this “Trop50″ stuff (what the hell kind of stupid name is that??) is sweetened with “Reb A PureVia™” which is some sort of “natural” concoction taken, in part, from a stevia plant.

Why spend the year and a half Tropicana says it spent creating this mixture of water, natural chemicals and orange juice? My guess is that oranges are expensive. Use less oranges by watering down the juice and then add sweetener which is cheaper than the oranges (according to Wikiepedia.org, stevia extracts can be up
to 300 times sweeter than sugar
so much less would need to be used). Voila! Tropicana charges the same for something that cost them less to make and, thanks to pretty much dishonest packaging, people walk out of the store (like @siskita did) thinking they bought orange juice when really they bought something else.

What’s even more grand is that Tropicana says this is all because they’re listening to their consumers: “We heard from consumers that some of them were seeking or wanting that goodness of orange juice but looking to reduce their sugar and calories. Trop50 answers that call.”

Uh-huh. I’m sure a whole lot of consumers were looking for lower-calorie fruit juice. Apparently, an official from Tropicana tried to calm the fears of some orange growers, worried Tropicana would buy fewer oranges now, by saying “This is really about bringing people back to orange juice who may have left.”

Riiiight. People stopped drinking orange juice because it wasn’t low-calorie enough.

What’s even more depressing (and a little disturbing) as that Trop50 is sponsoring a BlogHer group on BlogHer.com, the famous female-blogging community. So, essentially, it seems like Tropicana has convinced the BlogHer community to essentially endorse the kind of deceptive practices Tropicana is pulling in order to save a buck. I mean, think about all the moms out there who might look to this group’s endorsement of Trop50 and just naturally assume that Trop50 is orange juice. The BlogHer group is called “The Juice” after all, how ironic that Trop50 is only 42% juice.

What’s the big deal in the end? Well, I choose to consume as much natural food as I can–real, unprocessed substances are what I prefer to put in my body. Sure, I can’t always do that, but misleading me into drinking a liquid that was created in a lab and not nature is not cool. Thanks for being lame, Tropicana! I’ll be avoiding all of your brands from now on.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Immigration and Customs Enforcement Puts 104 in Custody on Actual Ice


by ThePete 12:21 am 2009-08-20
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Not too much to say that this screencap doesn’t already say (source ). Since the creation of the INS, over a hundred people in ICE custody have died–10 of which were only exposed thanks to a Freedom of Information Act request. That’s a little bit like the old “you never asked!” joke.

Regardless, people who may not even have been guilty of anything at all died in custody and no one seems all that concerned.

Just thought I’d mention it since illegal immigrants probably don’t deserve to die just because they broke an immigration law or two.

Just sayin’.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

700,000km Wad of Trash Floating in the Pacific Ocean


by ThePete 5:41 pm 2009-08-19
Categories | $ | Comments (1) »
listen via talkr

This shouldn’t be too surprising, but the lack of surprise doesn’t make up for the lameness of its existence. Yep, it’s a giant floating wad of refuse the various Pacific ocean currents have picked up and gathered toward the middle of the Pacific Ocean. The Wikipedia entry for the "Great Pacific Garbage Patch" explains that "The patch is characterized by exceptionally high concentrations of suspended plastic and other debris that have been trapped by the currents of the North Pacific Gyre."

It goes on: "It has been estimated that 80% of the garbage comes from land-based sources, and 20% from ships at sea. Pollutants range in size from abandoned fishing nets to micro-pellets used in abrasive cleaners. Currents carry debris from the west coast of North America to the gyre in about five years, and debris from the east coast of Asia in a year or less. An international project led by Dr. Hideshige Takada of Tokyo University studying plastic pellets, or nurdles, from beaches around the world may provide further clues about the origins of pelagic plastic, including that of the Pacific garbage patch."

OH and here’s what Wikipedia says the wad does to wildlife: "Many of these long-lasting plastics end up in the stomachs of marine birds and animals, including sea turtles, and the Black-footed Albatross. Besides the particles’ danger to wildlife, the floating debris can absorb organic pollutants from seawater, including PCBs, DDT, and PAHs. Aside from toxic effects, when ingested, some of these are mistaken by the endocrine system as estradiol, causing hormone disruption in the affected animal. Marine plastics also facilitate the spread of invasive species that attach to floating plastic in one region and drift long distances to colonize other ecosystems."

The Wikipedia article also mentions that the debris field is: "estimated to be twice the size of Texas."

Isn’t that great? It’s a giant floating garbage pile bigger than the biggest state in the union (assuming two-Texases > Alaska). I’m pretty sure there isn’t a person alive who wouldn’t find this fact pretty disappointing. Luckily, there are a few people looking into whether or not it can be cleaned up, but the fact that this has happened at all is pretty sad.

Thanks be to @Blogdrop who posted about the Great Pacific Garbage Patch" on his Posterous blog, blogdrop.posterous.com. You should go subscribe to it–it’s got a lot of great stuff–art, politics, current events, environmental stuff, too.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Oh the Hypocritical Lies: Death Panels have been around for years…


by ThePete 1:29 pm 2009-08-17
Categories | $ | Comments (1) »
listen via talkr

UNBELIEVABLE.

This is what I’m calling the voices against health care reform.

These people are either the biggest idiots or the biggest liars (with Sarah Palin, it’s very hard to tell).

So, Palin and others are "scared" there will be these government death panels deciding who lives and who dies based on how sick you are. What a crock. Companies have had this power for years now. Salon.com recently did a piece called "The ‘death panels’ are already here." The Salon piece mentions the case of Nataline Sarkisyan, who died in 2007 after insurance company Cigna dragged their feet because they decided a liver transplant wouldn’t save her life (she later died without the transplant).

Sounds pretty death-panelrific to me, but I remembered a case from further back–after about 30 seconds of Googling I found an excerpt on Michael Moore’s YouTube page from his old series The Awful Truth where he explored the case of Christopher Donahue, a man who’s insurance company, Humana, was refusing to pay for the pancreas transplant he needed to survive. Michael Moore held a funeral for Donahue outside of Humana’s headquarters, which Donahue, himself, attended. Before long, Humana caved and paid for the transplant, but as we saw years later with Nataline Sarkisyan, not all companies are as "generous" as Humana.

So, the next time you hear someone praise the free market for all things, think about this kind of situation.

If we truly believe all humans have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, doesn’t the "right to life" mean we have to make sure everyone can get health care? And if companies are going to put their "right" to make as much money above our right to life, doesn’t that mean that these corporations are anti-American and, really, anti-human? Pretty bizarre that they’re in the "business" of providing health care insurance when they look to ways to avoid doing just that.

So, UNBELIEVABLE, once again, that these idiots or assholes honestly think the government would institute death panels when they’ve existed for over a decade. That’s right–the Michael Moore show, The Awful Truth episode I described above was aired in 1999.

We’ve had death panels since last century–thanks, Sarah Palin (and others), for finally getting around to noticing just now.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)
  • Share/Bookmark

#BBCNewsFAIL: Why Capitalism and News Gathering Often Should Not Mix


by ThePete 8:02 pm 2009-07-05
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

OK, we all know how companies need to make money to survive, but, most of the time, I feel like commercialism has no place in news-gathering. The screencap above (original here) is a perfect example.

There’s nothing quite like an advertisement for life insurance right next to a story about someone who got killed.

It all reminds me of the web piece I put together shortly after 911: thepete.com/thespecialpages/disgustingpeople/

Today or eight years ago, money spent on advertising next to coverage of death and destruction seems to be money very poorly spent. In fact, I’d say it’s damaging to both the news source and the sponsor to do it this way.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

The Virgin Megastore in Times Square has Shut Down


by ThePete 4:12 pm 2009-04-24
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Guess we haven’t hit bottom yet!

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Apple Inc. Thinks My Mom Wants an iPod Touch for Mother’s Day


by ThePete 1:03 pm 2009-04-22
Categories | $ | Comments (4) »
listen via talkr

This from the morons who thought "cut and paste" wasn’t anything people wanted on an iPhone.

Tee-hee! This is where marketers are really starting to piss me off.

"Let’s try to convince EVERYONE that they need to buy our stuff–even people who would NEVER buy it!! Who cares if we waste a bucket-load of money and alienate customers who actually WOULD buy our stuff!! WE MUST BRAINWASH MORE PEOPLE TO BUY OUR CRAP!"

It must be tough believing your own line of bullcrap.

Well, my mom doesn’t own an iPod now and she seems pretty confident that she doesn’t want an iPod ever. She wants a Kindle long before she’ll go for an iPod, so, all Apple has managed to do with their recent email to me is piss me off and make me hate them more.

IT’S A RECESSION DICKWEEDS, MAYBE YOU SHOULD TRY TELLING US HOW YOUR STUFF IS CHEAP.

Hell, it’s really a depression, in which case, it’s downright immoral to be trying to convince people to buy an iPod for Mom rather than, you know FEED themselves.

But hey "they’ve got to make a living, right?"

Sure! And that’s much more important than me EATING.

Sorry, Mom! No iPod for you this Mother’s Day. I hope you’ll forgive me!

Yes, I am a Mac person, but I prefer to stay loyal to my soul rather than some stupid company, thanks.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

All of Your Paranoia about Government and Corporations is Accurate (and then some)


by ThePete 5:41 pm 2009-04-07
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr


Above: money doesn’t make the world go ’round–but it does keep the system moving.

Yeah, pretty sad when things in the real world happen like they would in a novel–you know when the people you trust betray you in a way you would never have expected? Let me get more specific.

Remember that thing called “government” that’s supposed to protect your rights and help organize society in a way that allows humanity to have an easier, more enjoyable time?

How about corporations? Remember them? They’re the groups of smaller businesses that team up to help better provide for the communities they exist in.

Well, that’s the way both were originally supposed to work, anyway. Alas, they’ve supplanted those wonderful ideals with concerns only for themselves. Corporations have the same rights as we individuals and, while they can’t vote, politicians make sure big businesses are more than equally represented in government.

Capitalism is dead and probably has been for years–it’s only recently that we’ve discovered its body. See, Capitalism too, has been supplanted by the system of Corruptionism.

The basic idea is that our leaders (both political and corporate) tell us that they care about all humans, our rights, the environment and our morals, but all they really care about is taking from us and giving to themselves. We give our money to corporations in exchange for products and services we don’t need (but are literally brainwashed to believe are necessary) and the corporations take that money and pay off politicians to make laws that make it easier for corporations to make even more money off of us.

Politicians are corrupt because they take money for favors. We are corrupt because our money comes from corporations that we then use for things we don’t bother realizing we don’t need. Corporations are corrupt because the people who run the corporations take money, ignore their own morals, and keep the corporate interests going.

Everyone is corrupt in this system.

Maybe the Corruptionist system (like most systems) can actually function to make life easier for us. However, take it to the extreme and we get what we have now.

Last month Matt Taibbi wrote an amazingly in-depth piece that you can find at RollingStone.com that covers the bail-out, the AIG mess, corrupt politicians and most importantly how this whole thing has functioned as a non-violent coup meant to wrest control of government (and therefore us) from our elected leaders. Of course, I’d suggest that our elected officials haven’t had any substantive power for years. Regardless, the reality seems to be that now they don’t. Here’s a bit from Taibbi’s article:

People are pissed off about this financial crisis, and about this bailout, but they’re not pissed off enough. The reality is that the worldwide economic meltdown and the bailout that followed were together a kind of revolution, a coup d’état. They cemented and formalized a political trend that has been snowballing for decades: the gradual takeover of the government by a small class of connected insiders, who used money to control elections, buy influence and systematically weaken financial regulations.

The crisis was the coup de grâce: Given virtually free rein over the economy, these same insiders first wrecked the financial world, then cunningly granted themselves nearly unlimited emergency powers to clean up their own mess. And so the gambling-addict leaders of companies like AIG end up not penniless and in jail, but with an Alien-style death grip on the Treasury and the Federal Reserve — “our partners in the government,” as Liddy put it with a shockingly casual matter-of-factness after the most recent bailout.

The mistake most people make in looking at the financial crisis is thinking of it in terms of money, a habit that might lead you to look at the unfolding mess as a huge bonus-killing downer for the Wall Street class. But if you look at it in purely Machiavellian terms, what you see is a colossal power grab that threatens to turn the federal government into a kind of giant Enron — a huge, impenetrable black box filled with self-dealing insiders whose scheme is the securing of individual profits at the expense of an ocean of unwitting involuntary shareholders, previously known as taxpayers.

That article has been sitting in a tab in Firefox since last month and is so incredibly long I still haven’t finished reading the whole thing. It’s a pretty good read, so far, though.

As much as I’d like to be wrong about this, the moral of the story seems to be that, ultimately, every ounce of stereotypical paranoia any of us have had about politicians and businessmen being liars has been accurate.

Politicians and businessmen are all lying–all the time. They may not even be aware of their own dishonesty, but the reality sure seems to be that eventually, any corporation and every politician will sacrifice what ever it/he/she needs to in order to make as much money as it/he/she can.


Click here to see visit my Disgusting People (Magazine)
page which I set up just days after 911.

One good example of this is when People Magazine put out their 911 Memorial Issue, just a few days after 911. They ran ads opposite pictures of the disaster. My “favorite” was a picture of a man on his knees, mouth agape, seemingly staring across the gap between the page his picture was on and the page facing him which featured an ad for State Farm life insurance.

I emailed the editor and complained. She replied with a bunch of rationalizations and apologized only for my offense. Members of an email list I was subscribed to at the time seemed nonplussed by my offense at People Magazine’s behavior.

“They have to make a living don’t they?” said one person on the list.

Here we are 8 years later and things have only gotten worse. We’re all just fodder for the machine of Corruptionism–we seem generally OK with that and so do our political leaders. So much so that, morals are put aside in favor of bringing in the cash so we can buy our iPods, pay our bills, and feed our kids. Our government takes our money (both directly through taxes and indirectly by having the Fed inject new cash into the system) and gives it to these corporations to keep them going and to quite literally reward them for their horrible behavior.

Just keep doing what you’re doing, the government seems to be saying.

But “corruption” is the right word for it, isn’t it?

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Naomi Klein on Corporate Opportunism


by ThePete 6:17 pm 2009-03-07
Categories | $ | Comments (2) »
listen via talkr

Photo Credit: Mariusz Kubik

Wandering the vast Internetz over the today I came across a post on DeusExMalcontent.com from last year referencing a couple articles I missed from Naomi Klein.

Naomi Klein, in case you’ve not heard of her, is a Canadian journalist who covers things decidedly unpopular to the establishment. Now, I’m sure most people would think of her as a “left wing” reporter, but I see her work as more anti-both sides of the political spectrum. She tends to slam both parties after all–the Republicans for their blind support of businesses and banks, and the Democrats for their lack of spine.

The first article the Deus Ex Malcontent blog points to is a Harpers.Org article from September of 2004. It’s all about the US Iraq Attack and how it was never about WMD or Iraqi Freedom or even about the oil. It’s really about creating a blank slate by clearing the playing field, both literally and mentally.


Buy it!

This article seems to have been the basis for Klein’s latest book The Shock Doctrine which compares the very frightening practice of shock treatment therapy to the way the military and big business seem to work in concert to remake a people into good little capitalists. The idea is that shock treatment regresses a single person back to near-infancy (as the theory goes) so that a new personality can be grown on a blank slate. The Shock Doctrine, Klein argues is the same process but on groups of people.

In the case of Iraq, the entire country is bombed into psychosis so that the survivors will be willing to accept any kind of (capitalist) society so long as it doesn’t include the shit being bombed out of them.

The other article the Deus Ex Malcontent blog post points to is a piece by Klein on how the Beijing Olympics were just a huge advertisement for the efficiency of government oppression in creating the perfect little free market capitalist society. In the article, Klein explains:

These Olympics are the coming out party for a disturbingly efficient way of organizing society, one that China has perfected over the past three decades, and is finally ready to show off. It is a potent hybrid of the most powerful political tools of authoritarianism communism — central planning, merciless repression, constant surveillance — harnessed to advance the goals of global capitalism. Some call it “authoritarian capitalism,” others “market Stalinism,” personally I prefer “McCommunism.”

While I respect Naomi Klein, I find the word “McCommunism” a bit too glib, especially since the word communism stops meaning anything once people are told to buy and sell things that aren’t theirs in the first place. The idea behind communism (I thought) is that the state/people own everything right? But this isn’t anything vaguely communistic.

I’m thinking it’s more a “Corruptionist” society.

Let’s think about it for a sec:

In China, corporations buy their way into markets, essentially bribing the Chinese government to make foreign investment easier. If government wants the big businesses to function in their towns, cities and country, they’ll do what big business needs them to do. Anything to get the money flowing.

HEY! That’s just like America!

I guess that makes the US a Corruptionist society, too, huh?

Posted via email from thepete’s posterous

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Economic Crash Now Directly Risking Human Lives


by ThePete 3:46 pm 2009-02-12
Categories | $ | Comments (7) »
listen via talkr

I first found this Salon article through a posting at DisInfo.com a great Digg alternative for folks who like to think for themselves but still like to see what sites/articles other, like-minded, folks are checking out. The Salon.com article in question is entitled “Is a shortage of patients hurting hospitals?.

The headline alone turned me off to reading the rest of the article, though–the DisInfo post points out: “Hospitals, doctors, and dentists are of late experiencing a shortfall of patients, as people who have been laid off lose their insurance (and thus the ability to pay for treatment)”

So, this is where the rubber hits the road–the private health care industry, that forces all Americans to pay for health care is now too expensive for a growing number of Americans to pay for.

The economic downturn is now putting a tremendous number of human lives at risk.

And it’s all in the name of making a profit, making a living, keeping businesses alive.

So, now businesses are more important than the lives of average Americans.

THIS is where our wonderful system has taken us.

Maybe now we can agree that capitalism unbridled is a bad idea.

Maybe now we can agree that the free market in all corners, unregulated, is a bad idea.

Perhaps, at this point, we can move toward universal health care for everyone since so many more of us now, thanks to the mistakes/insane greed on Wall Street and in Washington DC, can’t afford a doctor’s visit.

I don’t see any other way to cut this one.

You can’t blame all the people who got laid off during this economic crash for getting laid off.

Free health care MUST happen now.

If only our politicians would realize this.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Boycott Kellogg’s for Poisoning Us, Not for Ditching Phelps


by ThePete 3:11 pm 2009-02-06
Categories | $ | Comments (2) »
listen via talkr

Thomas Hawk suggests on his blog that we boycott Kellogg's cereals because they dropped Michael Phelps as a spokesperson for Corn Flakes cereal.  As we all have heard, the polygoldmedallic Olympic athlete was caught on camera sucking on a bong (you suck on bongs, right? I don't do that stuff so I've no idea).  Now, I'm absolutely, positively ALL for a boycott of Kellogg's cereals.  But not for the reason Hawk seems to be putting forth.

Now, while I agree that marijuana should be legal, it's still bad for you as smoking anything is.  Pot may have some benefits, but it's still smoking and smoking is bad for you.  Hell, I think we should boycott Michael Phelps for being an idiot and doing things to his body an athlete shouldn't do.  I mean, come on–a guy who swims doing something that could impact his capacity to breathe well??

What a fracking moron.

But I don't think we should bail on boycotting Kellogg's.  Remember, I said I am all for avoiding their cereals–the question is why.

The image attached to this post gives it away.  We're all led to believe by the Kellogg's Company that Corn Flakes is a tasty, reasonably healthy cereal.  Hell, it's got a polygoldmedallic Olympic swimmer on the box!  How could it not be healthy?  But check out the ingredients:

MILLED CORN, SUGAR, MALT FLAVORING, HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP, SALT, IRON, NIACINAMIDE, SODIUM ASCORBATE AND ASCORBIC ACID (VITAMIN C), PYRIDOXINE HYDROCHLORIDE (VITAMIN B6), RIBOFLAVIN (VITAMIN B2), THIAMIN HYDROCHLORIDE (VITAMIN B1), VITAMIN A PALMITATE, FOLIC ACID, VITAMIN B12, AND VITAMIN D.

Sure, it's got STACKS of vitamins in it, but its second and fourth-most plentiful substances are refined sugar and high fructose corn syrup.  Those two things are actually quite bad for you.  Refined sugar leaches vitamins from your system and messes with your adrenal glands.  HFCS has been linked to the rise of obesity in the US.

THIS is why we should boycott Kellogg's cereal.  Not because of some stupid marketing choice but because they put things harmful to our bodies in cereals that are supposed to be "part of this nutritious breakfast."

And kids, don't smoke.  It's just bad for you.

Posted via email from thepete’s posterous

Forgot to include a link to the original ingredients on Kellogg’s own website: www2.kelloggs.com/Product/ProductDetail.aspx?product=449

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Chicago Factory Worker Occupation Shows What Happens When the System Fails (We All Fail)


by ThePete 5:00 pm 2008-12-06
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

OK, so here's how I was told it was supposed to all work growing up:

1) You go to college
2) You get a good job (because you went to college)
3) Your boss pays you because he makes money in the business you both work at.

The reality in 2008:
1) college is becoming much too expensive for the majority of Americans to afford
2) no one is hiring because no one is making any money because no one is buying because no one is making any money etc, etc…
3) Your boss lays you off because most of point 2 applies to him AND in the case of one Chicago factory, he doesn’t even pay you

See, here’s what’s going on right now in a factory in Chicago according to an article at ChicagoTribune.com:

Workers laid off from their jobs at a factory have occupied the building and are demanding assurances they’ll get severance and vacation pay that they say they are owed.

About 200 employees of Republic Windows and Doors began their sit-in Friday, the last scheduled day of the plant's operation. On Saturday, about 50 workers could be seen through a window sitting on chairs and pallets on the factory floor. Reporters were asked to stay out of the plant’s work area.

If you have a Digg.com account, please Digg this important labor rights story

See, the company that owns the factory isn't making much money these days thanks to no one spending any money thanks to them not making any money these days.  Sorry, you know this bit.

But remember a few months back when King George talked about our entire economy being in danger? He also made the point in that speech that “every day lending” had to continue. This suggests that loans are something businesses take out all the time just to keep the gears of capitalism lubricated.

This suggests that without said loans, most businesses would fall apart.

Whose idea was a system that had to perform like a shark? If it stops moving, it dies.

The problem is, that because we’re all relying on this system, we all suffer.

So, banks fail, and can’t give every day loans to businesses that rely on those loans to pay employees. Employees then can’t eat or pay their bills or their mortgages and so they go hungry and homeless. Then, the banks don’t get paid back and they can’t give loans and they can’t loan to businesses and–sorry, again, you know this bit…

Yeah, good plan, assholes. Does anyone else see the circle-jerk-cum-downward-spiral there?

And just why should businesses need every day loans to pay their employees?

Shouldn’t their employee’s pay come from what the company makes? And if they can’t make money why are banks giving loans to them?

This whole system sounds completely screwed up and I’ve lost even more faith in American political, business and financial leaders for supporting this thing. As a fiction writer I couldn't get away with a premise like this one.

You know the old saying that a chain is only as strong as its weakest link? What happens when all the links are weak? The chain morphs into another cliched metaphor–the house of cards. This was just a matter of time, folks. The signs of our failing economy were all around us, too. I’ve been blogging for years about various canaries in the mineshaft. I wrote a post a year-and-a-half ago about how Tower Records closing down was a sure sign our economy was in decline, like it or not.

As a former fanboy I watched my most prized scifi toys sell for a fraction of what they should have gone for. As an inhabitant of a major American city, I saw a number of local businesses close and get replaced by chains like Starbucks or Blockbuster (even if they weren't coffee shops or video stores in the first place). Another canary is that our currency isn’t based on any thing real–no gold standard, no silver standard, just the credit of Americans as being able to produce goods and services.

Of course, America just lost over a half-million jobs last month, so you can imagine how much that hurts the value of our dollar.  Less jobs means less ability for the American people to produce goods and services which means less value for our dollar. That, in turn, weakens our economy even more.

You know what this all is?  It's a series of dominoes falling in very slow motion.

These dominoes are still falling. Can the Obama administration stop them?

Posted via email from thepete’s posterous

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Diamonds are for Terror: My Favorite Part About the Yes Men Parody of the New York Times


by ThePete 9:47 pm 2008-11-19
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

So, you have probably heard of that parody version of the New York Times the infamous Yes Men gave out recently in Times Square (of all places).  Well, they went full tilt and put up a website for it, too: http://www.nytimes-se.com/

If you're not aware, the Yes Men are high-end pranksters that don't just play dumb jokes on people, they play jokes on entire corporations.  Democracy Now's Amy Goodman reported on the Yes Men's NYT parody last week, explaining that "One previous prank had a Yes Men member posing as a Dow Chemical
spokesperson to announce responsibility for the Bhopal chemical
disaster, forcing the company to remind the world it had done anything
but."

Whoops!

Obviously, I dig these guys.  They've got a movie and a book that goes into more detail regarding their activities, so I'll stick to the depressing stuff.

While their humor is pretty much brilliant (and a little dry–they way I like it), one of the sharper jabs I'm sure got missed by most folks checking out the http://www.nytimes-se.com/ was the ad for De Beers diamonds.  This was great–it promised that "Your purchase of a diamond will enable us to donate a prosthetic for an African whose hand was lost in the diamond conflicts.  De Beers. From her fingers to his."

Zowee.  See, what corporations do (this is true of other corps, not just De Beers) is go into 3rd world nations and effectively bribe the governments into letting them take most of a particular resource and most of the profits made from that resource, as well.  The people of the country see little or no change in their standard of living and in the case of the the diamond conflict, were caught in the middle.  Rebels rose up against governments and tried to convince locals to work with them, not the government.  According to Amnesty International, Sierra Leone's Revolutionary United Front's "signature tactic was amputation of civilians: Over the course
of the decade-long war, the rebels have mutilated some 20,000 people,
hacking off their arms, legs, lips, and ears with machetes and axes."

AA also reports: "People had their hands chopped off by RUF units and were sent wandering hopelessly to spread the message of terror."

Weee!  God damn!  Is greed a horrible thing, or what?  Those rebels may have represented the interest of the people in wanting their piece of the diamond pie (like Alaskans get of the Alaskan oil pie) but the RUF and all others in positions of power took things way too far.  You may feel the urge to suggest that De Beers has "got the right to make a living" but can you say that when other people are dying for that living?  Or are being horribly mutilated?

The selling of high end gems taken from mines in countries where poverty is rampant is unfair, cruel and just plain shitty.

When are we going to start talking about greed being reeeeally bad?  When is De Beers going to start talking about making up for their greed?

Well, thanks to the Yes Men, they might just have an opportunity to be guilted into doing it right now.

Don't buy diamonds.  They're pretty, but pricey in more ways than you probably want to consider.

Posted by email from thepete’s posterous

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

CNN, Chevron & McCain, OH MY!


by ThePete 3:05 am 2008-10-16
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

utterli-imageSaw this on my iPhone tonight and couldn’t help but think "Wow, CNN brings us a pro-McCain headline sponsored by Chevron. Taste that irony!"

Seriously, even Fox News is admitting that Obama won this final debate and CNN.com says "McCain puts Obama on the spot."

Was Chevron that specfic when they bought the ad space?

Drill, baby, drill, indeed.
Mobile post sent by thepete using Utterlireply-count Replies.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

TheBlurb: Ignorance must really be bliss, or else why would so many people embrace it?
updated on 12/05/09 13:44:16 Change it! Archives