Skip to content
thepete.com - » In TheNews thepete.com

TheAdvertising:
:gnisitrevdAehT

American Dream or American Myth?


by ThePete 6:00 pm 2009-09-25
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Kid Rock has nothing to do with
this post. His knowledge of how
to treat the American flag is
mythical, however. :\

I’m a big believer in the power of myth. My only gripe is when people don’t admit that what they believe in is a myth in the first place. See, I don’t think aa story has to be true in order to learn valuable life lessons from it. So, I can be an Atheist and learn from Jesus, or not believe in the Federal Reserve and still earn and spend money. The thing is, I understand and admit that both are myths–fictions that don’t represent anything provable.

Now, the only reason I bring this up is because the other day, an Internet acquaintance of mine and I were talking about political party differences between my country and his (he’s in Germany) and naturally taxation came up (check the comments to see the convo). He referenced that little chestnut of historical Americana, “Taxation Without Representation” via the Boston Tea Party, and suggested it was our “founding myth.”

I did take issue with this, but only the part where he suggested that it was our “founding myth.”

Oh, I agree it’s a myth in that the “Boston Tea Partiers” were likely Freemasons who probably worked it out with the British East India Company (run by Freemasons) to let them throw British East India tea into the harbor, thus making it a kind of “false-flag operation,” and thus, a myth–but the idea that our country was founded on this myth? Nah, that’s not accurate to me at all. So, here’s how I replied (emphasis added for effect): More…

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Obama Asks Us to Take Responsibility: This isn’t Bizarro World, It’s Parody Earth (pt 5) My Solution Edition!


by ThePete 9:00 am 2009-09-25
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

OK, now after bitching about Obama calling for Americans to take responsibility for their health care by paying for insurance, I’d like to suggest my solution:

Learn from history.

You remember history, right? It’s that thing that happened before now.

It’s got all sorts of lessons for us to learn about what to do and what not to do–especially when you look at other countries!

See, in every other “civilized” nation in the world, health care is a right, not something you pay for. After all, what would “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” be without “life”?

So, I say you keep private insurers where they are for the folks that don’t trust government-run health care, but start up a UK-style NHS for those of us who don’t trust private health care or the insurance companies.

Who will pay for it? Well, ideally, us–in that we’ll still be alive thanks to it–but also our kids who will also benefit from it. If we’re REALLY smart, we’ll even take the money we normally spend on our military bases around the world and spend it on health care.

After all, if we keep going with the current system, tens of thousands will continue to die every year, not thanks to terrorist bombings (terrorists aren’t that good at killing), but thanks to a lack of affordable health care.

So, yes, I’m suggesting not only that we learn from history (GASP!) but also that we learn from OTHER COUNTRIES. (HEAVENS!)

Oh and we should also check the stupid labels at the door, too.

All this crap about “socialism” isn’t going to help anyone on either side of the political wall. Hitler wasn’t a bad guy because he wanted his citizens to have universal health care (did he?) he was a bad guy because he slaughter loads of people after he invaded a bunch of countries without a good reason.

Not that we would EVER do that!

COUGHnativeamericansCOUGH
COUGHiraqandafghanistanCOUGH

But I digress.

The point is, ditch the labels, learn from history and other countries who have done this successfully before.

Nothing will be perfect so grow the hell up.

All I know is that I’d like to go to the dentist for the first time in ten years. The two times I’ve been to the doctors in the same amount of time was when I went to the LA Free Clinic.

Everyone knows that I’m not some lazy bastard either, it’s obvious I’m not freeloading on the system or whatever. I work my ass off all the time, I just don’t make a lot (or any) money for it. I like to think that my good health and, in fact, my life is worth a bit of your money, just as much as I already feel the same about your health and life.

But until you start clicking that Paypal donate link (and not even for a while after that), or hire me, I can’t afford Mr. President’s plan.

So, what the hell are people like me supposed to do?

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Blackwater Ties with CIA: Is Anything Going to Come of This?


by ThePete 6:00 pm 2009-09-24
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Last month it came out that Blackwater (or whatever the heck they’re calling themselves these days), has massive ties with the CIA.

Seems like when the CIA wanted folks killed, they just outsourced it to the private sector.

This is how it starts folks–private contractors come in and do your empire building for you and the next thing you know, some dude with an Indian accent is asking what foreign leader you want to axed next.

OK, so it probably won’t happen exactly like that, but the Blackwater story will continue to flow downstream just like it has been for years now. Independent journalist Jeremy Scahill has been going after them for many trips around the sun and even wrote a book about them. And here comes the Christian Science Monitor and CNN (see: the screencaps in this post, sources: here and here), both mainstream news sources that reported on not just Blackwater but Blackwater getting hired to kill folks for the CIA. This isn’t the first time the guys from DarkH2O have been in the MSM, either. They’ve gotten press for “possible” massacres, random killings and maybe you remember those “contractors” who got pulled from their SUV outside Fallujah, killed, set on fire and hung from a bridge? Yeah, those dudes were Blackwaterians.

Gee, what would have made Fallujans mad enough be that horrible to a couple of guys in an SUV?

Regardless, nothing they’ve done stops Blackwater from existing and I believe they’re still doing things for the USG, too. If memory serves there were even Blackwater guys on the ground in New Orleans after Katrina.

How can any of this be legal? It’s like the Federal Reserve only with guns. How do you expect your senators and/or House reps to control what this armed corporation does in our names? It’s not like you or I can just vote Eric Prince, CEO of Blackwater, out of office anymore than we can vote out Ben Bernanke as the guy running the Fed.

More and more keeps coming up about Blackwater (really scary stuff, too) and yet no one seems to do anything about it.

Neat.

Want to learn more about Blackwater? Read Scahill’s book or at the very least visit his website: RebelReports.com. He’s also on Twitter.

OH and in case you’re curious, Blackwater changed it’s name to Xe Services…

…and then changed it again to US Training Center. At least, you end up at the US Training Center website when you aim your browser at: BlackwaterUSA.com.

Yeah, they’re having some issues with their image lately. Can’t imagine why…

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Obama Asks Us to Take Responsibility: This isn’t Bizarro World, It’s Parody Earth (pt 4)


by ThePete 9:00 am 2009-09-24
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Yep! Still going!

So, in part 1 the issue was Obama actually explaining to ABC News that car and health insurance are comparable.

In part 2, I focused on the lack of responsibility taken by the USG to keep practical poisons away from us.

Last time, in part 3, it was all about spending buckets on alleged military threats instead of providing universal health care for free.

This time I’d like to delve into the nitty-gritty of how Obama’s plan would even function. OK, so the understanding I have is that “most” Americans would be forced to have health insurance. Those that couldn’t afford it would get a tax credit.

Not very useful for people who are out of work and therefore aren’t paying any taxes.

See, ya can’t get a tax credit if you’re not making enough money to pay taxes.

AND, if you’re not making enough money to pay taxes, odds are, you’re not going to be able to afford health insurance either, so guess what!

If you can afford it the least, you get no help.

New boss same as the old boss.

“No Child Left Behind” ended up with a lot of child’s behinds left.

Now Obama-brand “change” seems to be promising to be about as effective, with Obamacare equating to “Obamacares about corporations more than it does people.”

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Attention Anyone Who Flies: Homeland Security Can Search Your Electronics


by ThePete 6:00 pm 2009-09-23
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Back on September 15, I got the latest edition of the privacy newsletter from EPIC.org in my inbox. In it, they talked about a BUNCH of things, including a new-ish policy on searching personal electronics. You can probably see the screencap of the news update from their website in this post, but just in case, here it is in text form:

Homeland Security Privacy Office Okays Suspicionless Seizure of Personal Information Stored on Digital Devices of US Citizens: The Department of Homeland Security released a Privacy Impact Assessment for searching electronic devices possessed by travelers, including US citizens, at US borders. The agency determined that laptops and cell phones are equivalent to briefcases and backpacks and granted itself broad authority to seize these devices from travelers and to copy stored data whether or not wrongdoing is suspected. The DHS policy fails to comply with the intent of the federal Privacy Act and leaves US citizens returning to the United States subject to surveillance by government and an enhanced risk of identity theft.

This is just LOVELY.

It’s one thing to assume we might have something that could actually harm the specific flight we’re about to board without any reason for suspicion and have our bags searched, but to assume we might have illegal data that would somehow be used to harm the plane or other passengers?

This is big brother big time.

Damn, and I’m flying to my dad’s in California for Christmas this year. Great. Gotta remember to delete all my child porn.

JOKE.

IT’S A JOKE.

Ironically, this whole move will just encourage sales of netbooks and the use of TheCloud for file storage. Why carry your data around on you and risk having some DHS guy come across it and steal your business idea or otherwise peak into your private life?

I know we literally don’t have a “right to privacy” in the Constitution, or anything, but I do believe there’s an amendment that promises something about not being subject to “unlawful search and seizure.”

Then again, I guess this is technically legal, huh?

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Obama Asks Us to Take Responsibility: This isn’t Bizarro World, It’s Parody Earth (pt 3)


by ThePete 9:00 am 2009-09-23
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Gah! Yes, I still have more to say about Obama forcing “most” of us to “take responsibility” and pay some greedy-ass insurance company for health insurance. I’m even still harping on Barry’s use of the word “responsibility.”

In part 1 of my “Parody Earth” series, I talked about how unfair it was that the corporations were getting this gift of all these new citizens being forced to cough up cash for healthcare.

In part 2 I talked about how the government isn’t taking responsibility for itself as protector of its citizens. To me there’s an even deeper hypocrisy to it than simply allowing the FAA to permit corporations to all but poison us and the FCC to allow ads for said corporations’ practical poison to get pounded down our throats.

This is part 3 and in it I say that my government should STFU about me taking responsibility for my health when it would rather rob American soldiers, Iraqis and Afghanis of their health by putting them in harms way.

Even worse: our tax dollars help do it!

So, rather than provide health care to millions of Americans for free, they’re going to pay over a trillion dollars to fight a non-existent threat in two foreign countries (and what has it gotten us, Obama has said, Al Qaeda is still out to get us).

That’s always been the big gripe from universal health care naysayers:

“How are you going to pay for it?”

How are we going to pay for Iraq and Afghanistan?

“Well, we don’t have a choice for those!”

????

So, tens of thousands die every year due to a lack of health care, yet, somehow we HAVE to stop a tiny group of extremists by invading two countries??

Just who kills more people? Terrorists or health issues like obesity or cancer?

Seriously: Can you answer the question why we spend so much on fighting wars and so little on curing disease and keeping people healthy?

I bet you can’t.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Hang on–UN wants ISRAEL to Allow Nuke Inspections??


by ThePete 6:00 pm 2009-09-22
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Huh. Seems the UN is always pissing and moaning about SOMEbody’s nukes! Here’s a cutting from a September 18, 2009 article called “U.N. body urges Israel to allow nuclear inspections” that explains:

Arab states in the U.N. nuclear assembly on Friday won narrow approval of a resolution urging Israel to put all its atomic sites under U.N. inspection and join the Non-Proliferation Treaty.

The Jewish state deplored the measure for singling it out while many of its Islamic neighbors remained hostile to its existence, and said it would not cooperate with it.

Sheesh–how dare the UN take issue with Israel’s nukes!! How else can Israel threaten retribution against other countries??

“You wanna invade? You wanna invade? Oh, I’ll give you an invasion!… with RADIATION!!”

Wait. Was that just an Italian stereotype or a Jewish one?

Like there’s really a difference–the point I’m trying to sarcastically make here is that clearly, Israel needs it’s nukes to protect them against…

…against…

uh…

Who again?

Those Palestinian folks who blow themselves up in pizzerias?

Or the loud-mouthed Arabs who whine endlessly about how the Holocaust never happened?

Why the hell does anyone need nukes, by the way?

I have no problem with Israel existing–I just don’t understand why they get so much preferential treatment (and nukes). I’m not saying the US shouldn’t help them out should they get in trouble, but this whole thing with them and their nukes–it makes no sense to me.

First, they haven’t really admitted to having nukes.

Second, no one else in the area has nukes. (Let’s grow up kids, Iran doesn’t have nukes and keeps insisting they only want nuke power not nuke weapons–it’s not fair to assume they are lying without some sort of ACTUAL proof.)

Third, if ANYone does ANYthing to Israel, America will pounce immediately. None of that waiting months to invade Afghanistan or years to invade Iraq after 911. When Israel gets attacked, we’ll jump so fast.

And that’s fine with me. If we find ACTUAL evidence that Iran or any of the Arab nations on Israel’s block have nuke weapons, then I don’t mind moving sooner.

But until then, I think all countries should be as transparent as possible with their nukes–especially if we (and Israel) expect other countries to give into inspections.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Obama Asks Us to Take Responsibility: This isn’t Bizarro World, It’s Parody Earth (pt 2)


by ThePete 9:00 am 2009-09-22
Categories | $ | Comments (2) »
listen via talkr

Let’s review:

On Sunday September 20, 2009, President Barack Obama gave interviews to a number of Sunday morning talk shows to talk about, among other things, his plan for health care reform in America. A September 20, 2009 article on Bloomberg.com explains:

“For us to say that you’ve got to take a responsibility to get health insurance is absolutely not a tax increase,” Obama said in an interview on ABC’s “This Week” program. “Right now everybody in America, just about, has to get auto insurance. Nobody considers that a tax increase.”

This is what is really starting to make me sick about politicians. Ridiculous generalizations. However, while some folks are mad that he’s comparing human health to the damage a car makes when it crashes, we miss what makes me even more sick to my stomach when it comes to politicians.

Blatant hypocrisy.

Sure, we’re all hypocritical at some point in our lives. But come on, man–how ANYone in government thinks it’s fair to point to the American people and tell US to be responsible is beyond me.

Seriously. The President of the United States wants me to be responsible about my health care.

How about you kiss my ass?

Since 2003, I’ve been eating 90% whole/real foods, avoiding anything processed when it’s possible. No easy feat no thanks to the FDA and the FCC.

Seriously, folks, ya gotta ask yourself why sweeteners are added to FRUIT JUICE?

Why is there high fructose corn syrup in BREAD??

It’s because the FDA says it’s OK.

Why does practically EVERY commercial I see on TV during cartoons or other kids programming try to sell me sugared cereal or cookies or candy or soda or something else bad for me?

Why is it that the FCC allows advertisements for things that, if consumed to excess, WILL KILL YOU?

Cigarette ads on TV aren’t legal, yet one cigarette a month won’t kill anybody.

However, eat a pint of ice cream a day and you’ll die of a coronary (and tax the health care system along the way).

Come on, Barry–it’s your job as part of the government to PROTECT your citizens. THAT’S THE DEAL. But all you’re doing is protecting the right of corporations to sell us shit that MAKES US SICK.

And you tell US to be responsible and pay for health insurance?

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Obama Asks Us to Take Responsibility: This isn’t Bizarro World, It’s Parody Earth (pt 1)


by ThePete 9:00 am 2009-09-21
Categories | $ | Comments (3) »
listen via talkr

Seriously.

President Obama said the following in an ABC News interview today: “For us to say that you’ve got to take a responsibility to get health insurance is absolutely not a tax increase,”

Uh-huh. Let’s think about this for thirty seconds.

He’s right. It’s not a tax–it’s a government hand out to corporations. By passing a law that says we MUST pay a health insurance provider for services, we’re not paying a tax, we’re paying a tithe–like the kind you give in a church–a tribute to God, basically.

I’m an atheist, so I don’t give to churches. Likewise, I don’t believe in the insurance system (health or otherwise). I think it’s a terrible system that allows people to get rich off of the suffering of others.

I don’t care if they’ll be forced to cover me, I don’t want to support them.

But if Obama has his way, I will have to.

Obama also said the following in that ABC interview: “Right now everybody in America, just about, has to get auto insurance. Nobody considers that a tax increase.”

NO, THEY DON’T HAVE TO GET CAR INSURANCE.

Man, do I HATE politicians who pull this shit!

Just because YOU drive a car doesn’t mean EVERYONE DOES.

As it happens, I live in NEW YORK CITY.

But guess what: I sold my car in 2004–four years before I moved to NYC, when I still lived in Los Angeles.

So guess what, Obama and America: one-size does NOT fit all and I don’t appreciate the suggestion that I HAVE to pay into a system that I morally object to.

I sold my car in order to avoid spending hundreds of dollars a year on:

Maintenance
Fuel
Registration
Parking
Insurance

So, Barry, don’t tell me about how health insurance is equivalent to car insurance because it’s not.

I stopped driving a car half-a-decade ago. I can’t stop driving my body.

What you’re suggesting is nothing but a juicy present for the insurance companies.

Funny how banks and corporations get what amounts to health care from the government while we living, breathing humans have give up our freedom to opt out of systems we don’t believe in.

Part 2 coming tomorrow.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Former Heads of CIA Ask Obama to Stop (the Department of) Justice


by ThePete 7:50 pm 2009-09-20
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Check out a cutting from the September 19, 2009 article capped to the right on NYTimes.com:

Seven former directors of the Central Intelligence Agency asked President Obama on Friday to shut down the new Justice Department inquiry into past abuses during interrogations of terrorism suspects, arguing that it “will seriously damage” the nation’s ability to protect itself.

In a letter to Mr. Obama, the former C.I.A. chiefs said the cases under study had already been examined by career prosecutors who found that no criminal charges were warranted. To reopen cases based on a change in which political party controls the government, they wrote, will make it harder for intelligence officers to take risks without worrying that some future attorney general might investigate them.

“Those men and women who undertake difficult intelligence assignments in the aftermath of an attack such as September 11 must believe there is permanence in the legal rules that govern their actions,” the men said in their letter.

Yes and if they did nothing wrong, then none of us have anything to fear. Proving we don’t do bad things will discourage terrorists from hating us.

Of course, if we did do something wrong, then don’t we set a good example by prosecuting them?

Sure, it compromises some of our intelligence operations no matter what, but this is the cost of being a moral nation.

Isn’t it better to clean up after ourselves and risk the consequences than to not remove all doubt that we’re a moral country?

Sometimes we have to take some lumps for our principles–we can’t just whine about it and make excuses.

Do what’s right, Obama. Make sure those investigations happen or those things you should be investigating will happen again–maybe not under your watch, but sometime down the road. After all, what example are you setting?

“Let’s look to the future.”

Uh-huh. When I look to the future I see leaders abusing their power because we let them get away with it before.

Just my ¥2, of course, but I learned a long time ago that you lead by example. Set a good one and good people will follow you.

Set a bad example and bad people will follow you.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Turns out Almost Everyone Will be Mandated to Have Health Insurance Under the Baucus Plan


by ThePete 5:36 pm 2009-09-18
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

So, if you check out the screen cap from the web page for today’s edition Democracy Now story on Democrat Max Baucus’s bill for health care “reform” you’ll see the part I highlighted.

Yeah, we’ll all be forced to support the health insurance industry–you know the health insurance industry! They’re the fine folks that think it’s OK that the thousands of uninsured people die every year. Yeah, we will be forced to support these greedy-ass people if this bill passes. The good news is that this won’t pass–I’ve read a number of news sources that quote politicians on both sides of the party wall who say they won’t support it.

What’s disturbing here is two fold.

First, that the fact that statistically so many people are set to die this year due to a lack of affordable health care is not causing an nation-wide uproar. (Though later in an interview with one of the people behind the study that came up with the 45,000 number seemed to revise it down to 25,000 and just the other day I posted about the number being down around 18,000. The point is, tens of thousands of people are dying because the system has let them slip through the cracks.)

Secondly, this bill is a big fat gift to the insurance industry. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see how this benefits them:

Mandate (force) most Americans to get health insurance and that means HUGE dollars for insurance companies.

There’s also a third aspect I already mentioned of not giving us an option to opt out of supporting the greedy-as-hell insurance industry. Thanks Baucus, you corrupt bastard.

Who cares about Tax-N-Spend Democrats? I’m more worried about Take-”Bribes“-N-Pass-Laws Democrats (and Republicans)!

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Health Care Workers Underresourced for the Pandemic Flu Season


by ThePete 1:06 pm 2009-09-18
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Reaters.com reported today about how “US health workers worry about flu vaccine.

However, the headline is a little misleading since the health care workers aren’t worried about the vaccine itself but having enough of it and enough trained people to administer the vaccine to so many people. The key point of this article comes in this excerpt:

“We do not have the resources we need and we haven’t for a while,” Dr Jeffrey Duchin of Public Health in Seattle & King County and the University of Washington said in an interview.

“The problem is we don’t have a coordinated healthcare system in this country. We don’t have a national framework that allows these interventions.”

Hm, you mean like a nationalized health care system? Yeah, that sounds pretty handy–too bad we ain’t got one o’ those layin’ around…

Then again, if we did, that’d clearly mean we were socialists–better dead of swine flu as a “capitalist” than alive and a socialist, right?

RIGHT??

You know who else were socialists?

The Nazis!

Taking care of the sick without charging them is just the top of the slippery slope! Next thing you know you’ll be slaughtering Jews in concentration camps.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Obama Admin Wants to Hike the USG’s Debt Ceiling


by ThePete 9:00 am 2009-09-17
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

One of the things I used to bag on George W Bush a lot for was hiking the debt ceiling. Back in 2004 he talked Congress into bumping it up to $8 trillion (FYI: the National Debt is now approaching $12 trillion) and look how much that helped us! We got to wage more war. YAY!

So, here comes 2009 and Obama needs more cash.

SIGH.

The Wall Street Journal seems to think Congress may not want to let him up the limit the USG can borrow from the Fed. Seems there’s been a lot of hubub in DC about overspending.

SIGH.

Where were these idiots when Bush was overspending on imaginary threats?

Regardless, the USG is going to keep borrowing whether Congress wants to or not. How do I know this? Because they always do. If we stop WHO KNOWS WHAT COULD HAPPEN?!?!

Look, I’m sure the USG can stop borrowing WHEN EVER IT WANTS.

Hey, it quit in the Clinton years. Why couldn’t it quit again?

“Quit again!

You don’t quit “again” and if we ever hope to slow down, stop, or somehow achieve the impossible and actually lower the National Debt, we need to get this government a fricken intervention, because CLEARLY it is NEVER going to stop borrowing on its own.

That’s it, I’m calling the UK.

“Britain? Yeah, hey man, it’s ThePete. You invite France and Germany over to Canada’s apartment. I’ll tell America that we’re just going to hang out and play Playstation. It’s time for some serious tough love.”

SIGH.

If only it were that easy…

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Think 18,000 Lives are Worth Saving? Then Let’s have a National Health Care System.


by ThePete 9:00 am 2009-09-16
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

OK, this is the kind of shit that makes me really mad when it comes to our health care system and our supposed “news media” whose very job it is is to keep us informed of the world around us.

First, why doesn’t the media keep us informed of numbers like this? They’re just a JOKE at this point. Second, when the media finally DOES do its job, why does no one seem to care very much?

Nicholas D. Kristof wrote an op-ed piece at NYTimes.com that quotes a staggering figure–one that made me slide off the runway of my day when I first read it. I was dumbfounded. Now, hopefully, you are, too.

Here’s a cutting from Kristof’s op-ed:

In 2006, Nikki White died at age 32. “Nikki didn’t die from lupus,” her doctor, Amylyn Crawford, told Mr. Reid. “Nikki died from complications of the failing American health care system.”

“She fell through the cracks,” Nikki’s mother, Gail Deal, told me grimly. “When you bury a child, it’s the worst thing in the world. You never recover.”

We now have a chance to reform this cruel and capricious system. If we let that chance slip away, there will be another Nikki dying every half-hour.

That’s how often someone dies in America because of a lack of insurance, according to a study by a branch of the National Academy of Sciences. Over a year, that amounts to 18,000 American deaths.

What.

The.

Fuck.

When I first read that, I immediately made the same connection Kristof does in the very next paragraph in his piece.

Every year SIX TIMES the number of people who died on 911 die because they can’t afford proper health care.

Yet, to avenge the deaths of 3000 we’ve spent over a trillion dollars.

Which would you rather do?

1) Spend a trillion and cause the deaths of thousands of American soldiers, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and Afghanis (and fail to capture bin Laden or bring stability to the countries you invade)

or

2) Save 18,000 lives a year and improve the lives of those 18,000 and many more while spending nowhere near a trillion dollars in the process

It’s a simple choice, in my mind. We’re not any more safer for taking option #1. In fact, it’s possible the deep-ass hole our economy is in might not be so deep if it weren’t for us invading two countries.

Just think about it:

Spend a few hundred billion and save the lives of tens of thousands of Americans or spend over a trillion to stop more 911s from happening. You’d need three more 911s to see as many dead as you would not paying for poor people’s health care. It would take 107 more Oklahoma City bombings or 7.5 Pearl Harbor attacks to see as many Americans dead as we do the number of dead caused by a lack of affordable health care.

Sure, sure, health care companies need to make a living. That’s why they exist. Apparently.

That whole “saving lives” thing? Yeah, that’s um… hey, what IS that about, anyway?

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Republicans Accuse Dems of Hypocrisy over Joe The Heckler–oh the ironic PAIN


by ThePete 1:34 pm 2009-09-15
Categories | $ | Comments (2) »
listen via talkr

I’m glad I wasn’t drinking anything when I read the below paragraph excerpted from an article today at Boston.com:

“In another stunning example of hypocrisy, congressional Democrats are wasting taxpayers’ time and resources on a legislative measure to censure Congressman Joe Wilson so they don’t have to talk about their exceedingly unpopular health care plan,” Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele said in a statement.

I am almost speechless.

THREE WORDS FOR YA STEELE:

Osama bin Laden

You remeber him! He’s the guy YOUR PARTY was supposed to see captured “dead or alive.”

Yes, it’s the “Party of Life” that fights two wars, killings hundreds
of thousands, torturing, sacrificing our values, sacrificing both
domestic and international law in the War Against Terror which has yet to yield the guy who you people said attacked us eight years ago–and you have the balls to accuse ANYONE of hypocrisy?

Fuck you, Michael Steele and the Republican Party.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Proposed Bill Would Allow President to Seize the Internet


by ThePete 9:00 am 2009-09-15
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Huh, this reminds me a little of a novel I wrote once.

Seems that there’s a bill that was introduced last spring in the US Senate that would allow the USG, specifically the POTUS, to disconnect private computers and/or networks from the ‘net. The bill’s been revised, but it still doesn’t sound so hot. Here’s how an August 28, 2009 article at Cnet.com explained it’s current form:

The new version would allow the president to “declare a cybersecurity emergency” relating to “non-governmental” computer networks and do what’s necessary to respond to the threat. Other sections of the proposal include a federal certification program for “cybersecurity professionals,” and a requirement that certain computer systems and networks in the private sector be managed by people who have been awarded that license.

So, now the government wants to license network IT guys. In other words, you’d need permission from the USG to run a computer network that extended beyond your house (by the sound of it, anyway). Juuust great–it’s vaguely possible that such a measure might cut down on spam or hacking-related crime, but it’ll make a lot of IT people’s lives harder. That’d be one less thing I would be able to do for a living since I’m broke and couldn’t afford a license.

But it’s the “do what’s necessary to respond to the threat” part that I love the most. What the hell does that mean?

Anything.

That’s what’s so scary. The original bill made it sound like they could come into your house, unplug your wifi router and walk off with it. I use Skype, talk about an abridgment of free speech!

But in the new version of the bill it sounds like literally anything could be done to your computer. I LOVE power grabs like this because people don’t think the worst of government until it’s too late (or if it’s about something irrational like death panels).

Back in the late Clinton years, the USG passed a law called the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). In short, it banned the discussion of hacking digital copyright methods online. Think of it like someone telling you that you’re not allowed to talk about safe cracking.

Yeah, people didn’t think it would be a big deal back in the day because it seemed like the Internet might still be a fad. Well, it wasn’t.

Likewise, this S.773 bill scares me because it was developed behind closed doors and we don’t really know why it would even be necessary unless Senator Jay Rockefeller, the author of S.773, knows something we don’t.

I just love it when politicians think they deserve to know things that we don’t. It was a politician who once expressed that the Internet was “a series of tubes,” or “a truck” or something. I really don’t like trusting these besuited morons with our tax dollars, our country AND our Internet.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

One Last Thing About 9/11/9 and One Last Pic, this one of my bro & I at the WTC long before 911


by ThePete 4:45 pm 2009-09-14
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

That’s a photo my parents took of me and my little brother (I’m the cuter one on the left) sitting in front of The WTC Sphere sculpture as it originally stood, in between the Twin Towers. I’m guessing it had to be taken in the mid-to-early 1980s since my little brother is still shorter than me in this image (he’s really my step-brother and today towers over me by several inches).

A few decades later, while my wife and I walked past the site where that picture was taken, now a big hole in the ground surrounded by blue fencing, I looked for the memorial spotlights the City of New York had been using to commemorate the victims. In years past, I had heard that they were placed in the hole. However, they weren’t there on this September 11th. They were on, but several blocks south.

My wife suggested that perhaps they were moved to avoid getting in the way of construction of the permanent memorial. I replied:

“What construction?”

Politics and miscellaneous city-BS has kept anything else from being built on the spot over the last eight years. This is absolutely fine with me, since I’ve always felt that the spotlights were the perfect homage to the victims of the September 11, 2001 attacks on the WTC. Poetic, haunting, somber, and practically impossible to exploit for a quick buck. They’re actually suggesting that shopping areas be included in the memorial in some capacity.

I say we pave over the whole thing and leave the spotlights in place, year-round. Have a gift shop and a non-profit org to pay for the electricity that the spotlights use. Hell, we could even take
donations to set up solar panels to gather energy in the day to power the spotlights at night.

I used to think that Ground Zero should just have another pair of
towers built on it and let a bunch of businesses set up shop inside. My idea was that we’d be showing the terrorists that they haven’t won.

The problem is, they did win.

Ground Zero, to me, is a tomb stone, not just for the 2752 people who were killed thanks to the attacks, but for the countless number of people who have died because of how America reacted to the attacks–American soldiers, Iraqis and Afghanis who have died because of the wars we were so convinced were necessary after we were attacked by a handful of rag-tag loser-extremists who got very lucky that day.

Let the lights stay.

Let them serve as an eternal flashlight on ourselves and our decisions in the days, weeks, months and years following that horrible day in September.

We need anything but “business as usual.”

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Pentagon Grants (Returns) “New” (Old) Rights to Afghan Prisoners


by ThePete 1:08 pm 2009-09-14
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr

Yes, this is actually GOOD news. BBC news reported today that the Pentagon has
decided to "grant" Afghan prisoners at Baghram the right to challlenge their detention
. Here is a short cutting from the BBC News article:

US defence department spokesman Bryan Whitman said inmates would be allowed to go before a panel "periodically" to contest their detention, reports AFP.

Huh, that sounds like the right of Habeus Corpus–the right for any detained person to see the body (corpus) of evidence brought before them. It’s one of the oldest "unalienable" rights guaranteed man, existing long before the US Constituion which, I believe, also guarantees it (which says to me the Pentagon is likely in violation of international law by not guaranteeing it).

So while this BBC News article and the Pentagon call this a "new" right that’s been "granted" to these prisoners, you should note that this is one of the oldest rights in the book and that the right isn’t being "granted," but "returned." You should also note that in order for the Pentagon to "return" something they must first "take it away."

Here’s the fun little ironic cherry on top, though–check out another cutting from the Beeb News article:

Mr Whitman added that it was a process the US had used in Iraq.

It helped US officials there "manage the detainee population and ultimately reduce the detainee population by ensuring that we are only holding those that are the most dangerous threats," he said.

So, basically, if the Pentagon had been doing this all along it would have helped them run their prison better.

Don’t these people THINK before they do anything?

UPDATE 9/14/9 4:31 EDT: Today’s Democracy Now points out why the prisoners aren’t even getting full Habeus Corpus back–it turns out the prisoners don’t get lawyers–they just get a US military official who, in theory, will help each prisoner “gather witnesses and evidence, including classified material, on behalf of the prisoners to challenge their detention in proceedings before a military-appointed review board.”

Well, it’s still an improvement.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Just a Friendly Reminder that We Tortured


by ThePete 6:00 am 2009-09-14
Categories | $ | Comments (0) »
listen via talkr


So, while Obama still would like to keep looking forward and not backward (at all the bad stuff we did during the War Against Terror) I, just a regular American citizen, will look back for my President and quote what Glenn Greenwald said in a post on Salon.com back in August. In turn, Greenwald quotes, in his post, a 2004 CIA’s Inspector General Report released due to a FOIA request made, not by the New York Times, or Time Magazine, or Newsweek, or any other mainstream news source. Greenwald reminds us that it was the ACLU who is uncovering the evidence required to go after torturers in our own country and not the news media. But that’s a side note.

So, here’s what Greenwald found was done in our name, to keep us “safe,” and to preserve our wonderful freedom:

Threats of execution (img)
Threats to kill detainee and his children (img)
Threats to rape detainee’s female relatives in front of him (img)
“Buttstroking” with rifles and knee kicks (img)
Blowing smoke in detainee’s face for five minutes (img)
More “convincing and poignant” waterboarding of the type we prosecuted Japanese war criminals for using (img)

You can click each of those to see scans of the pages of the report that match up with the type of torture to read some of the details. Unfortunately, too many of the details have been redacted by the USG, but hey, at least we know for sure that this definitely happened. The government admitted it did these things and they all sound illegal to me.

Don’t think they’re that bad? Well, Greenwald adds:

The IG Report also documents numerous other abuses that have been documented by prior OLC memos, including having waterboarded detainees 82 and 183 times; hanging them by their arms until interrogators thought their shoulders might be dislocated; stepping on their ankle shackles to cause severe bruising and pain; putting them in a diapers and leaving them doused with water on cold concrete floors in cold temperatures to induce hypothermia, etc. Some of the numerous deaths of detainees during interrogations were also discussed (for details on detainee deaths, see here and here). After documenting all of that, the IG Report notes:


(img)

Yeah, so this stuff is all wrong. There has been no declaration of war against the country of Al Qeada, so we can’t treat them as POWs and even if we could, we’d be forced to treat them better than this. These people are just that–people. They deserve a fair trial and every other right promised every human on the planet in the US Constitution. Just because we don’t like them doesn’t mean they stop being human. But if we do this stuff, it’s we who stop being human.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

Joe “The Heckler” Wilson Refuses to Apologize in the House


by ThePete 1:24 pm 2009-09-13
Categories | $ | Comments (2) »
listen via talkr

This screencap comes from an article on Reuters.com. It reports on how the Republican Representative from South Carolina refuses to apologize on the House floor. Wilson was apparently on Fox News Sunday today (WHO SAW THAT COMING???) where he said that he is a person who believes in the truth and felt he had to say something when he heard the President of the United States make misstatements in a live, televised address watched around the world.

Fine–forget the massive show of disrespect, forget the message of disorder a House rep heckling the President sends other countries (AND AL QEADA! GASP!), forget that there’s plenty of time for him to be on Fox News after Obama was done speaking. I’ll ignore all of that and in exchange for the answer to just one question:

Where was this idiot over the last eight years? When Bush trumped up reasons to go into Iraq did Joe The Heckler call him George The Liar? When Dick Cheney spoke bald-faced lies about Saddam Hussein having connection with Al Qeada did Joe The Heckler hold a press conference where he called Dick out?

No, of course not. Why? Because Wilson is a liar, himself. I just proved it.

I really hope the Dems grow a pair on this one and censure Joe Wilson. Sure they were too spineless to even try to impeach Bush but this should be much easier.

It’s also a shame that almost nobody is calling Wilson and other Republicans out for their money-first/human-life-second (or third or fourth) attitude.

They recognize no hypocrisy when they call themselves "pro-life" but then fight for war and fight to bail-out the banks and corporations and now fight to make sure all Americans don’t have access to healthcare.

The fact that the Democrats don’t just put the smackdown on the Republicans pretty much proves that America is anything but "a culture of life."

I also wonder how long it’s going to be before people notice the Revolving Door politicians use to kiss corporate ass now in exchange for good corporate jobs later once they leave their cushy positions in politics (only to end up back as politicians or in appointed government positions later).

So in the end Wilson’s ego is now too big to allow him to apologize on the House floor and his brain is too stupid to realize that such an apology on the House floor would be a great opportunity to call Obama out again.

Duh.

On a side note, I’m wondering why Reuters put that article in their "Canada" section. Ah well…

EDIT: In case you missed it, I first posted about Joe “The Heckler” Wilson back on Thursday.

BTW: I keep calling him “Joe The Heckler Wilson” because I don’t want anyone to confuse him with outed-CIA-agent Valerie Plame’s husband, former diplomat Joe Wilson. THAT Joe WIlson was the Joe Wilson who suffered the wrath of the Bush administration when he told the truth about their being no evidence that Saddam was looking for uranium in Africa by having his under-cover wife’s status as an under-cover CIA operative blown.

Neat how both Joe Wilsons say they believe in the truth. Too bad only one of them really does.

VN:F [1.6.0_870]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Bookmark

TheBlurb: Ignorance must really be bliss, or else why would so many people embrace it?
updated on 12/05/09 13:44:16 Change it! Archives