
This is how crowded #TimesSquare is for #NYE at 3:17pm. Kinda crazy…, a photo by thepetecom on Flickr.
We’re close to seeing the ball, but not close enough to ACTUALLY see it :/

We’re close to seeing the ball, but not close enough to ACTUALLY see it :/

I also wrote a negative review in the App Store. Where you get your money from does matter, doesn’t it? (I’m honestly asking.)

Not a bad point, huh?

Saw this just now on the way down to meet up with TheWife for an evening excursion in midtown. In case you’re not familiar with NYC, 190th Street is near the top of Manhattan Island while Wall Street is almost at the bottom of it. Meanwhile, 1st Street is only about a fourth(ish) of the way up. So yeah, the #OWS spray-painter is a bit off.
Digest powered by RSS Digest
This is the Absurd Disconnect buying the souvenir mug right here–the above “quote of the day” comes from the NYTimes daily top headlines email. Just so Google can see it, here it is in the text:
QUOTATION OF THE DAY
“To say that I’m enjoying a millionaire’s lifestyle – well, I can tell you, I guess a millionaire’s income doesn’t go very far these days.”
ED PASTOR, an Arizona Democrat who is among 250 members of Congress with a net worth of $1 million or more.
What a douchebag. Um, hey man, you want to try trading incomes with me? Because I’ll gladly take the tough life you’ve got going on and then you can see how the other half lives–er–the other 99% lives, I mean.
Ed Pastor is profiled in an NYT article today where his comments clearly show that, Republican or Democrat, money makes you stupid–or at least amoral, or maybe both–I mean, how, in today’s economic climate, do you talk about being a millionaire and that a million doesn’t go very far these days??? Did Pastor even stop for a split second to consider how that sounds to himself, let alone the rest of us?
The article also reports on how the income gap between our leaders and us is more dramatic than it has ever been. It even goes so far as to refer to Pastor and other millionaires in Congress as “aristocrats.” That sure sounds accurate to me. These guys need to wake up and smell the reality that their corporate overlords/golf-buddies are robbing us to pay them. If they can’t make a million go very far then maybe they should try giving the money to people who will put it to better use. For instance, shelters, hospitals that can’t afford to stay open, schools, charities that provide relief to disaster-stricken areas or ANYONE who isn’t a rich, jerk-off, politician.

The hardest part of cooking a turkey—waiting for it to cool. Oh the torture!!! #firstworldproblems

We just put it in the oven while the "Santa Claus Conquers the
Martians" episode of MST3K plays on our TV. May your Christmas be the
Swayze-est of them all!
Contrary to what some celebrity-types think, I don’t think it’s a good idea to blindly support a leader just because you voted for him. I mean, what if the guy blatantly goes against what he said he’d do? Like how Obama is issuing these signing statements like the NYTimes reported:

Obama says he’ll enforce the parts of the new budget bill he thinks don’t infringe on his powers as president. This sounds like a case of “new boss, same as the old boss” to me. Especially since Obama said during his campaign that he wouldn’t use signing statements to dodge the will of Congress. And it looks like this won’t be the only instance of him issuing a signing statement to get around the will of Congress. The screencap below comes from a recent post on talkingpointsmemo.com:

So, yeah, Holder says Obama will be signing the already controversial NDAA of 2012 into law but will tack on a signing statement to make it less objectionable to him. So we’re basically watching Godzilla and King Ghidora trying to decide who should destroy Tokyo. Not only does the NDAA seem to violate the US Constitution, but Obama tweaking it at his whim is dictatorial regardless of the ends he uses to justify said tweaking. Hell, if Obama and Bush can decide to not follow laws they decide are unjust, then why can’t everyone?